Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Manajemen pengembangan kompetensi guru untuk implementasi Kurikulum 2013 di SMA Negeri Pilot Project Yogyakarta
Pardjono Pardjono, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan manajemen pengembangan guru untuk implementasi kurikulum 2013 di SMA Negeri Pilot Project Yogyakarta. Studi ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus. Penelitian dilakukan di SMA N 2 dan SMAN 8 kota Yogyakarta. Teknik pengumpulan data: observasi, penelusuran dokumen, dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) perencanaan dilakukan dengan meninjau peraturan menteri pendidikan nasional tentang Kurikulum 2013. (2) pengorganisasian dilakukan oleh kepala sekolah dengan membentuk sebuah tim. (3) pelaksanaan dalam bentuk workshop, pelatihan dan pengembangan, pendidikan dan pelatihan, In-House Training, MGMP, serta studi lebih lanjut. (4) pengendalian dilakukan dengan supervise oleh kepala sekolah. (5) Faktor pendukung pengembangan kompetensi guru adalah: pertama, keberadaan guru yang telah menjadi instruktur nasional pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013. Kedua, guru memiliki motivasi yang tinggi untuk mengikuti program pengembangan kurikulum ini. Ketiga, sekolah menyediakan anggaran untuk pelaksanaan program pengembangan. Faktor penghambatnya adalah; pertama, peserta program tidak mendapatkan gaji. Kedua, kendala teknis seperti proyektor rusak. Ketiga, perencanaan waktu pelaksanaan agar tidak mengganggu kegiatan pembelajaran di sekolah.
Management of teachers competence development for the implementation of curriculum 2013 at pilot project state senior high school of Yogyakarta
Abstract
This study aims to describe the management of the development of teachers for curriculum implementation in 2013 at the pilot project of state senior high school of Yogyakarta. This study is a qualitative research in methods of case studies. Research conducted at the SMA N 2 and SMAN 8 Yogyakarta. Data collection techniques: direct observation, review or archive documents and interviews. The results showed: (1) planning is done by reviewing the regulation of the Minister of national education about curriculum 2013. (2) organizing is done by the head of the school by forming a team. (3) the implementation in the form of workshops, training, and development, education and training, in-house Training, MGMP, as well as further study. (4) Controlling is done by supervising by school principals. (5) supporting the development of teacher competence Factors are: first, the existence of a teacher who has become a national instructor curriculum implementation of 2013. Second, teachers have a high motivation to follow this curriculum development program. Third, schools provide a budget for the implementation of development programs. Inhibiting factor are; First, program participants get no salary. Second, the technical barriers such as the projector is broken. Third, planning implementation time so as not to interfere with learning activities at school.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arikunto, S. (2006). Dasar-dasar supervisi. Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta.
Bell, L., & Rhodes, C. (2002). The skills of primary school management. London: Routledge.
Chan, J. K. S. (2010). Teachers’ responses to curriculum policy implementation: olonial constraints for curriculum reform. Educational Research Policy Practice, 9, 93–106.
Drake, B. H., Meckler, M., & Debra, S. (2002). Transitional ethics: Responsibilities of supervisors for supporting employee development. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 141–155.
Griffin, R. W. (1990). Management. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Hasanah, U. N. (2015). Evaluasi implementasi Kurikulum 2013 pada SMA pilot project di Kota Yogyakarta. Thesis. Unpublished. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Johnnie, P. B. (1993). Formal education: a paradigm for human resource development in organization. International Journal of Education Management, 7, 4–8.
Kaswan, Ki., & Akhyadi, A. S. (2015). Pengembangan sumber daya manusia: dari konsepsi, paradigma, dan fungsi sampai aplikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Mahapatro, B. B. (2010). Human resource management. New Delhi: New Age International Publisher.
Masadeh, M. (2012). Training, education, development and learning: What is the difference? European Scientific Journal, 8(10), 62–68.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded source book. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Mulyasa, H. E. (2015). Guru dalam implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nandi, R. A. (2015). Pengaruh kepemimpinan kepala sekolah, profesionalisme guru, dan pelatihan guru terhadap implementasi Kurikulum 2013 di sekolah menengah kejuruan negeri kota Yogyakarta. Thesis. Unpublished. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Naris, S. N., & Ukpere, W. I. (2012). Evaluation of human resource development and training at a higher educational institution in Namibia. African Journal of Business Management, 6, 11859–11864.
Noe, R. A. (2005). Employee training and development (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Priansa, J. D. (2014). Perencanaan & pengembangan sumber daya manusia. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ristiyani, R., & Wijayanti, W. (2014). Peningkatan kompetensi guru sekolah dasar Budi Mulia Dua Seturan, Depok, Sleman. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 2(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.21831/amp.v2i2.2450
Sudjendro, H. (2014). Siap menyongsong Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (1997). Pengembangan kurikulum teori dan praktek. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Syakir, M. J., & Pardjono, P. (2015). Pengaruh kepemimpinan kepala sekolah, motivasi kerja, dan budaya organisasi terhadap kompetensi guru SMA. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(2), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.21831/amp.v3i2.6339
Tharenou, P. (2001). The relationship of training motivation to participantion in training and development. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 599–621.
Usman, H. (2014). Manajeman: teori, praktik, dan riset pendidikan (4th ed.). Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Widodo, S. E. (2015). Manajemen pengembangan sumber daya manusia (Yogyakarta). Pustaka Pelajar.
Wilcox, B. L. (1997). The teacher’s portofolio: an essential tool for professional development. International Reading Association, 51(2), 170–173.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research : design and methods. London: Sage Publication.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/amp.v7i1.9525
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Our journal indexed by:
ISSN 2461-0550 (online) || ISSN 2337-7895 (print)
 | Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jamp is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. |