Analysis of learning motivation in improving learning outcomes in economics subjects between students of class XI social sciences and class XI natural sciences

Damaris Iqdam Wibowo; Dela Refi Novi Saputri; Dwi Mutmainah; Ermita Yusida; Sarmi Sarmi

doi:10.21831/hsjpi.v8i1.51865

Analysis of learning motivation in improving learning outcomes in economics subjects between students of class XI social sciences and class XI natural sciences

Damaris Iqdam Wibowo, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
Dela Refi Novi Saputri, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
Dwi Mutmainah, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
Ermita Yusida, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
Sarmi Sarmi, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia

10.21831/hsjpi.v8i1.51865

Abstract

Learning motivation is one of the things that significantly affect student success in learning activities. The learning process that needs to be followed by learning motivation from students will cause the learning objectives to be achieved to be less than optimal. This study aims to determine the difference in learning motivation in improving economic learning outcomes between class XI students majoring in mathematics and social studies at Senior High School (SMA) Negeri Malang for the 2021/2022 academic year. The population of this study was 192 class XI students spread across six classes, namely five classes from the social studies department and 1 class from the mathematics department. Sampling using nonprobability sampling techniques for as many as 60 students. The research hypothesis is that there are differences in learning motivation in improving learning outcomes in economics subjects between students majoring in mathematics and social studies majors at SMA Negeri 6 Malang for the 2021/2022 school year. Data collection is carried out using questionnaires. This research is a comparative study. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis techniques. The study's descriptive analysis results showed that the average score of the learning motivation questionnaire survey results showed a difference in values of 0.53. Meanwhile, the average score of student learning outcomes shows a difference in grades of 0.5. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the hypothesis is accepted, which means that there are differences in learning motivation in economics between students majoring in mathematics and social studies majors at SMA Negeri 6 Malang for the 2021/2022 academic year.

Keywords

Economic lessons; learning motivation; learning outcomes; mathematics; natural sciences; social studies

Full Text:

PDF

References

Astuti, E.S., & Resminingsih. (2010). Bahan Dasar untuk Pelayanan Konseling pada Satuan Pendidikan Menengah Jilid I. Jakarta : PT. Grasindo

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1987.4306538

Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. Journal of extension, 50(2), 1-5.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford University Press, USA.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 2.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. DOI: 10.1177/1524839915580941

Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109-134. DOI: 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486-489. DOI: 10.5812/ijem.3505

Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003, October). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.

Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9780857021496

Liem, A. D., & Martin, A. J. (2012). The Motivation and Engagement Scale: Theoretical framework, psychometric properties, and applied yields. Australian Psychologist, 47(1), 3-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00049.x

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology.

Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141-184. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5

Marsh, H. W., & O'Mara, A. J. (2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 542-552. DOI: 10.1177/0146167207312313

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533-544. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003117452

Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578. DOI: 10.3102/00346543066004543

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209-218. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 207-231. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133

Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00525.x

Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta

Silondae, S., & Priyatmo, D. (2019). Perbandingan Motivasi Belajar Antara Siswa Jurusan MIPA dan Jurusan IPS di SMA Negeri Anggaberi Kabupaten Konawe. Gema Pendidikan, 26(2), 1-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36709/gapend.v26i2.8174

Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. DOI: 10.1177/2345678906292430

Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19-31. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4

Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202-209. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.202

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1994). Children's competence beliefs, achievement values, and general self-esteem: Change across elementary and middle school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 107-138. DOI: 10.1177/027243169401400203

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. Handbook of self-regulation, 13-39. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/hsjpi.v8i1.51865