Pengembangan Komik Animasi Digital Untuk Simulasi American Service

Prihastuti Ekawatiningsih, Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Boga Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Wika Rinawati, Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Boga Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Ilmawan Mustaqim, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

 10.21831/hej.v1i2.23272

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan media komik animasi untuk simulasi pembelajaran melayani makan dan minum (food and beverage service) di restoran, khususnya materi American Service. Penelitian dilakukan untuk merancang alur cerita American Service dalam bentuk komik, khusunya memilih materi American Service yang sesuai, membuat alur cerita dan mengembangan komik American Service. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian dan pengembangan model 4D (define, design, developt and dissemination). Define dilakukan untuk menetapkan materi pembelajaran yang dapat disimulasikan dalam cerita komik. Desain dibuat bentuk komik dan developt dilakukan untuk menguji dan memperbaiki komik sekaligus menambah animasi. Disseminasi dilakukan dengan media on-line melalui situs internet Jurusan Pendidikan Teknik Boga dan Busana. Subjek penelitian untuk menguji produk  ditetapkan 5 pakar dan 40 orang calon pengguna. Metode pengumpulan data pengujian produk menggunakan teknik Delphi, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) dan observasi tampilan komik. Hasil  pengujian dianalisis secara deskriptif kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Penelitian menghasilkan rancangan media komik digital American service dengan sistem American Service, menggunakan aplikasi Comicize-thecomics maker dan Photo talks:speech bubbles. Pada tahap ini dapat diidentifikasi materi untuk pengembangan komik berupa American service.


Keywords


american service, animasi digital, komik

Full Text:

PDF

References


Burden, P. R., & Byrd, D. M. (1998). Methods for effective teaching. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Cisco Public Information. (2012). A cisco networking academy point of view advancing assessment with technology, diperoleh dari www.cisco.com/go/trademarks tanggal 18 Mei 2012

Clauser, B. E., Harik, P. & Clyman, S. G., (2000). The generalizability of scores for a performance assessment scored with a computer automated scoring system. Journal of Educational Measurement. Fall 2000, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 245 261

Conner, C. (1991). Assessment and testing the primary school. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press

Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The Systematic Design of Instruction (4th Ed.). New York: Haper Collins College Publishers.

Griffin, P., & Peter, N. (1991). Educational assessment and reporting. Sidney: Harcourt Brace Javanovich Publisher (Hambleton, 1991: 13).

Huitt, W. (2001). Assessment, measurement and evaluation: Undergraduate version. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved (17 Nopember 2007), from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/edpsyc/ edpmsevl.html

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Meaningful assessment, A manageable and cooperative process. Boston : Allyn and Bacon

Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In Brennan, R. B. (Ed). Educational measurement (4th ed) pp 17 – 64. American Council on Education Praeger.

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A. (1994). An empirical study of computerized adaptive test administration conditions. Journal of Educational Measurement. Fall 1994, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 251 263.

McIntire, S. A., & Miller, L. A. (2000). Foundation of psychological testing. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Mehrens, W. A., & Lehman, I. (1973). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Robert L. Linn (Ed). Educational measurement (3rded) pp. 13-103. New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan

Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods, qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ). Boston: Pearson Education Inc

Oshima, T. C. (1994). The effect of speediness on parameter estimation in item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement. Fall 1994, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 200 219.

Pitkin, A. K. and Vispoel, W. P. (2001). Differences between self adapted and computerized adaptive test: A meta analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement. Fall 2001, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 235 241

Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B. & Willson, V. (2010). Measurement and assessment in education 2nd edition: New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall

Rodiguez, M. C. (2003). Construct equivalence of multiple choice and constructed response items: A random effects synthesis of correlation. Journal of Educational Measurement, Summer 2003, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 163 184

Sumadi Suryabrata. (1981). Pengukuran dan penilaian pendidikan, (Kumpulan makalah penataran bimbingan dan konseling untuk tenaga pengajar di PT se Indonesia, edt). Jakarta: Dirjen Pendidikan (Suryabrata, 1981).

Yahya Umar. (1996). Bahan penataran pengujian pendidikan. Jakarta: Puslitbangsisjian-Depdikbud




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/hej.v1i2.23272

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Prihastuti Ekawatiningsih, Wika Rinawati, Ilmawan Mustaqim

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

index by 

Creative Commons License

Home Economic Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Home Economics Journal Stats