RESEARCH TRENDS IN PEER FEEDBACK IMPLEMENTATION IN EFL WRITING CLASSES
Keywords:
Peer feedback, written corrective feedback, writing skillsAbstract
This systematic review aimed to present a systematic summary of the trends in the implementation of peer feedback, particularly in teaching writing skills in the EFL context. Research articles were collected from two different databases, namely Scopus and Web of Science. After being reviewed based on selected inclusion and exclusion criteria, 50 out of 162 collected articles were then further examined. The present study shows how peer feedback implementation is discussed in research articles published from 2022 to 2024. The majority of studies were conducted in 2022, most of the reviewed studies were developed based on the quantitative research design, and most of the feedback was delivered in direct face-to-face interaction.
References
Adrefiza, A., & Fortunasari, F. (2020). Written corrective feedback on students' thesis writing: an analysis of student-supervisory interactions. JELTIM (Journal of English Language Teaching Innovation and Materials), 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v2i1.37317
Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2015). Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2215–2222.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches(5th ed.). Sage publications.
Dí¶rnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies.Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Kim, S., & Chang, C. H. (2022). Japanese L2 learners' translanguaging practice in written peer feedback. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(4), 1363–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1760201
Kuyyogsuy, S. (2019). Promoting Peer Feedback in Developing Students' English Writing Ability in L2 Writing Class. International Education Studies, 12(9), 76. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n9p76
O'neill, R., & Russell, A. M. T. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students' perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. In Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (Issue 1).
Thi, N. K., & Nikolov, M. (2022). How Teacher and Grammarly Feedback Complement One Another in Myanmar EFL Students' Writing. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 767–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00625-2
Van der Kleij, F. M., Adie, L. E., & Cumming, J. J. (2017). The effects of peer- and self-assessment on students' academic achievement and perceptions: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 20, 111–123.
Wang, Y., Luo, X., Liu, C. C., Tu, Y. F., & Wang, N. (2022). An Integrated Automatic Writing Evaluation and SVVR Approach to Improve Students' EFL Writing Performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811586
Zhang, Z. (Victor), & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 MAJORA: Majalah Ilmiah Olahraga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
