SPORT DOPING : KNOWLEDGE OF ATHLETES FROM SPORT SCIENCE FACULTY UNESA
Keywords:
knowledge, dopingAbstract
This study aims to determine the doping knowledge of athletes from the Faculty of Sports Science, State University of Surabaya. This research is quantitative and descriptive. The method used in this research is a survey with a closed questionnaire collection technique. The data obtained with this closed questionnaire was processed by quantitative descriptive statistical analysis and categorization using a frequency distribution table. The results showed that the level of knowledge of FIO Unesa student-athletes in the good category was 18 athletes (37.51%), in the sufficient category as many as 26 athletes (54.16%), and in the less category as many as 4 athletes (8.33%). The conclusion that can be drawn in this study is that the athlete's knowledge of Anti-Doping is very important for athletes in understanding knowledge about Anti-Doping so that athletes do not use doping in increasing or achieving an achievement because doping does not guarantee a maximum achievement.
References
Allen, J. B., Morris, R., Dimeo, P., & Robinson, L. (2017). Precipitating or prohibiting factor: Coaches' perceptions of their role and actions in anti-doping. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 12(5), 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954117727653
Allen, J., Taylor, J., Dimeo, P., Dixon, S., & Robinson, L. (2015). Predicting elite Scottish athletes' attitudes towards doping: examining the contribution of achievement goals and motivational climate. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(9), 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.976588
Djoko Pekik, I. (2006). Panduan Gizi Lengkap Keluarga dan Olahragawan. 45–46.
Engelberg, T., & Moston, S. (2016). Inside the locker room: a qualitative study of coaches' anti-doping knowledge, beliefs and attitudes. Sport in Society, 19(7), 942–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2015.1096244
Engelberg, T., Moston, S., & Blank, C. (2019). Coaches' awareness of doping practices and knowledge about anti-doping control systems in elite sport. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 26(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2017.1337724
James, R., Naughton, D. P., & Petróczi, A. (2010). Promoting functional foods as acceptable alternatives to doping: Potential for information-based social marketing approach. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-7-37
Mazanov, J., & Huybers, T. (2010). An empirical model of athlete decisions to use performance-enhancing drugs: Qualitative evidence. Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, 2(3), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/19398441.2010.517046
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2022 Tentang Keolahragaan. Pemerintah.
Syukri, M., Badri, H., Effendi, H., Keolahragaan, F. I., & Padang, U. N. (2019). Pengetahuan, Tinjauan Atlet, Doping Sepeda, Balap Binaraga, Dan Kota, Di Syukri, Muhammad Badri, Hanif Effendi, Hastria Keolahragaan, Fakultas Ilmu Padang, Universitas Negeri. 19, 18–32.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 MAJORA: Majalah Ilmiah Olahraga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
