ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS ON BIPA TEACHING MATERIALS SPECIAL MATERIALS OF AGRICULTURE

Defina Defina, Yumna Rasyid, Sakura Ridwan

Abstract


ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS ON BIPA TEACHING MATERIALS SPECIAL MATERIALS OF AGRICULTURE

 

Defina1), Yumna Rasyid2), Sakura Ridwan2)

Institut Pertanian Bogor1) dan Universitas Negeri Jakarta2)

email: defina@ipb.ac.id

 

Abstract

               Every teaching and learning process needs to be evaluated. One aspect that is evaluated is teaching material that is prepared and used by the teacher. Evaluation of teaching material can be done by asking for an assessment of students (students) as users of the material. This study aims to describe the results of student evaluations of integrative and content-based Indonesian language teaching material models for specific purposes of agriculture for foreign speakers. This research is evaluative research. The evaluation used in learning is program evaluation and not learning outcomes. Respondents were 14 students of BIPA IPB Developing Country Partnership Program (KNB). Data analysis based on the feasibility evaluation category with three criteria, namely discarded, maintained with revision, and maintained. The results of the study are as follows. First, the results of student evaluations are subject to the draft teaching material in the high category, with details: draft one 4.0 (high); second draft 4.3 (high); and third draft 4.5 (very high). Secondly, the input submitted, namely the need to add a variety of listening tasks (draft first), variations in the overall form of the task (second draft), perfecting the task of listening, reading, and layout (third draft).

 

Keywords: assessment, users, teaching materials BIPA, agriculture

 

PENILAIAN MAHASISWA TERHADAP BAHAN AJAR BIPA

MATERI KHUSUS PERTANIAN  

 

Abstrak

Setiap proses belajar mengajar perlu dievaluasi. Salah satu aspek yang dievaluasi adalah materi ajar yang disusun dan  digunakan oleh guru. Evaluasi materi ajar dapat dilakukan dengan meminta penilaian pemelajar (mahasiswa) sebagai pengguna dari materi tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan hasil penilaian mahasiswa terhadap model materi ajar bahasa Indonesia integratif dan berbasis isi untuk tujuan khusus pertanian bagi penutur asing. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian evaluatif. Evaluatif yang digunakan dalam pembelajaran adalah evaluasi program dan bukan penilaian hasil belajar. Responden adalah 14  orang mahasiswa BIPA IPB Program Kemitraan Negara Berkembang (KNB). Analisis data berdasarkan kategori evaluasi kelayakan dengan tiga kriteria, yakni dibuang, dipertahankan dengan revisi, dan dipertahankan. Hasil penelitian sebagai berikut. Pertama, hasil penilaian mahasiswa terdadap draf materi ajar pada kategori tinggi, dengan rincian: draf satu 4,0 (tinggi); draf kedua 4,3 (tinggi); dan draf ketiga 4,5 (sangat tinggi). Kedua, masukan yang disampaikan, yaitu perlu ditambahkan variasi  tugas menyimak (draf kesatu), variasi bentuk tugas secara keseluruhan (draf kedua), menyempurnakan tugas menyimak, membaca, dan tata letak (draf ketiga).

 

Kata kunci: penilaian, pengguna, materi ajar BIPA, bidang pertanian


Keywords


persepsi mahasiswa

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustina, R., et al. (2013). “Implementasi pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia bagi penutur asing di UPT P2B Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta. DalamJurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra. 1 (2),140-154. https://eprints.uns.ac.id/2831/1/189-350-1-SM.pdf.

Akil, M. 2018. Evaluating a New Writing Material: Students’Perception towards the Use of a Teacher-made Coursebook. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 9 (3), 525-533. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0903.11.

Al-Roomy, M. (2017). ESP in a Saudi Context: Where Does it Stand?” Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 8 (6), 1109-1115. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0806.11.

Bátyi, S. (2017). The role of attitudes in the development of Russian as a foreign language: A retrospective study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. 7(1): 149-167 Doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.1.8 http://www.ssllt.amu.edu.pl.

Borg, W. R. dan Meredith D. G. (1983). Educational Research: an Introduction. 4th Edition. New York: Longman.

Brown, H. D. 2007. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. San Francisco: Longman.

Brown, JD. (1995). The Elements of Language Curriculum: A Systematic Approach to Program Development. Boston: Heinle&Heinle Publishers.

Buck, G. (2002). Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Council of Europe. (2015). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. London: Cambridge University Press. www.coe.int/lang-CEFR.

Byrd, P. (2001). Textbooks: Evaluation for Selection and Analysis for Implementation., Dalam Celce-Murcia, ed, Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Singapura: Tomson Learning.

Dick, W., Lou C., dan James O. C. (2009). The Systematic Design of Instruction. 7th Edition. Ohio: Pearson.

Fatimah, A.S. (2017). Teaching In 21st Century: Students-Teachers’ Perceptions Of Technology Use In The Classroom. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching. 2(2),126-135. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24903/sj.v2i2.132.

Harwood, N. (2010). Issues in Materials Development and Design. Dalam Engglish Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice, Nigel Hawood, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge Language Education.

Hazlina, A. (2012). The Secondary School English Language Reading Curriculum: A Teacher’s Perceptions. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra. 12(2)1-2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v15i2.11825.

Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for Language Teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jolly, D. & Rod B. (2011). A Framework for Material Writing. In Brian Tomlinson. Ed. Material Development in Language Teaching. London: Cambridge University Press.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. London: Yale University Press.

Muhfiyanti and Aimah, S. (2018). Persepsi Siswa terhadap Materi Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Peminatan pada Siswa SMA N 15 Semarang”. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Mahasiswa Unimus. (1) 522-527. http://prosiding.unimus.ac.id/index.php/mahasiswa/article/download/196/200.

Nation, I.S.P. dan John M. (2010). Language Curriculum Design. New York: Routledge.

Noni, N. (2016). Primary School Teachers’ Perceptions of and Practices in the Selection and Development of English Learning Materials. Jurnal Litera Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya. 15 (2), 227-238. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v1i2.11825.

Rediati, A. (2015). Pengembangan Buku Pengayaan Cara Menulis Teks Penjelasan Bermuatan Nilai Budaya Lokal untuk Peserta Didik Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. 4 (1),1-7. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/article/view/6849.

Richards, J. C. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swandayani, D. 2010. “Bentuk-bentuk Poskolonial pada buku ajar Bahasa Prancis”. Seminar Internasional FBS UNY. http://www.staf.uny.ac.id

Tomlinson, B. (2010). Principles of Effective Materials Development. In Nigel Harwood. Ed. English Language Teaching Material: Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge Language Education.

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.) (2007). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London: Continum, The Tower Building.

Ur, P. (2009). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v18i1.15613

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

______________________

 

                       

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Copyright of LITERA ISSN 1412-2596 (print) and ISSN 2460-8319 (online)

      

The International Journal of Linguistic, Literature, and Its Teaching at http://http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/litera/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

 

Flag Counter