The Implementation of Occupational Health and Safety Using Zerosicks in Indonesia Vocational Education

Ketut Ima Ismara, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Arie Wibowo Kurniawan, Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia
Heru Subaris Kasjono, Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Zamtinah Zamtinah, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Bima Mustaqim, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
Haris Imam Karim Fathurrahman, Ahmad Dahlan University, Indonesia
Azka Adnanda, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia


This study aims to determine (1) the implementation of occupational health and safety (OHS) using the Zerosicks method in vocational education and (2) the significant relationship between each aspect of the countenance stake evaluation model. The model consists of 3 stages: input (Antecedent), process (Transaction), and output. Then, the population in this study involved 727 students with a sample size of 258.03, and this research was conducted in April-June 2021 at the Prambanan Muhammadiyah Vocational High School. Furthermore, the data analysis techniques used were quantitative descriptive and SEM (Structural Equation Modeling). The study findings reveal that (1) the antecedent stage, encompassing environment, hazard, risk, knowledge, and standardization indicators, is evaluated as excellent by teachers and predominantly good by students. In the Transaction stage, focusing on risk management control, solution, implementation, and culture indicators, teachers rate it as good to perfect, while students generally rate it as very good to good. Moreover, the output stage, comprising control and OHS behavior awareness indicators, is deemed outstanding by both teachers and students. (2) The indicators of the model are valid and achievable following the results of the confirmatory factor analysis, and the structure of the theoretical model fulfils the Goodness of Fit criteria for empirical data because it has six criteria. Furthermore, an antecedent has a significant effect on Transaction and OHS Output, while a Transaction has a significant effect on OHS Output.


Evaluation; countenance stake; occupational health and safety; zerosick


K. I. Ismara and R. Suratijo, “Zerosicks, Health and Safety Electrical Module in Vocational Education Management,” 2021.

A. F. Ibrahim, “The Impact of Environmental Design on the Safety and Security of the Residential Environment,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 28, no. 15 SE-Articles, pp. 641–658, Nov. 2019, [Online]. Available:

K. I. Ismara, A. Suharjono, and D. Supriadi, “Ubiquitous learning in occupational health and safety for vocational education,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 285–292, 2021, doi: 10.11591/IJERE.V10I1.20823.

S. Tucker and N. Turner, “Waiting for safety: Responses by young Canadian workers to unsafe work,” J. Safety Res., vol. 45, pp. 103–110, 2013, doi:

I.-M. Andersson, K. Gunnarsson, G. Rosèn, and M. Moström Åberg, “Knowledge and Experiences of Risks among Pupils in Vocational Education,” Saf. Health Work, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 140–146, 2014, doi:

B. O. (Benjamin O. . Alli, Fundamental principles of occupational health and safety / Benjamin O. Alli. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2008.

International Labour Organization (ILO), Occupational Safety and Health Management System. Geneva, 2016.

A. Hafeez et al., “Industrial hazards and safety management in pharmaceutical industry,” Int. J. Appl. Res., vol. 6, pp. 1–7, 2020.

K. I. Ismara, D. Supriadi, M. R. Syifaulliya, and K. Keaw-aram, “The School-based Occupational Safety and Health Management in Vocational School,” Tamansiswa Int. J. Educ. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2 SE-, pp. 11–22, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.30738/tijes.v2i2.9937.

I. P. M. Dewantara, “Stake Evaluation Model (Countenance Model) in Learning Process Bahasa Indonesia at Ganesha University of Educational,” Int. J. Lang. Lit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–29, 2017, doi:

S. B. Al Maktoum and A. M. Al Kaabi, “Exploring teachers’ experiences within the teacher evaluation process: A qualitative multi-case study,” Cogent Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2287931, 2024.

S. Duan, X. Han, X. Li, and H. Liu, “Unveiling student academic resilience in language learning: a structural equation modelling approach,” BMC Psychol., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 177, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01665-1.

S. Alinia, M. Asghari-jafarabadi, and L. Mahmoudi, “Heliyon Predicting mortality and recurrence in colorectal cancer : Comparative assessment of predictive models,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 6, p. e27854, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27854.

J. J. Thakkar, “Applications of Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS 21, IBM SPSS BT - Structural Equation Modelling: Application for Research and Practice (with AMOS and R),” J. J. Thakkar, Ed. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020, pp. 35–89. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-3793-6_4.

F. S. Rawnaque et al., “Technological advancements and opportunities in Neuromarketing: a systematic review,” Brain Informatics, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 10, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40708-020-00109-x.

N. H. C. M. Ghazali, “Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the School-Based,” Ta’dib J. Islam. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 73–86, 2016.

R. Hidayat, S. Zamri, and H. Zulnaidi, “Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Achievement Goals for Indonesian Students in Mathematics Education Programmes,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/99173.

R. P. Sarmento and V. L. Costa, Comparative approaches to using R and Python for statistical data analysis. Porto: Information Science Reference, 2017.

R. P. A. Silva, L. C. B. de Macêdo, and I. L. R. da Silva, “Avaliação das características psicométricas dos questionários utilizados nos periódicos da área contábil: um estudo longitudinal compreendido no período 2003-2012.,” An. do Congr. Bras. Custos - ABC, vol. 0, no. 0 SE-Metodologias de ensino e pesquisa em custos, Jan. 2023, [Online]. Available:

J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th Editio. Pearson, 2009.

A. Elliot, K. Murayama, and R. Pekrun, “A 3 x 2 Achievement Goal Model,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 103, pp. 632–648, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1037/a0023952.

R. Alik, A. Jusoh, and T. Sutikno, “A Review on Perturb and Observe Maximum Power Point Tracking in Photovoltaic System,” vol. 13, no. 3, 2015, doi: 10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v13i3.1439.

A. Amini and M. Alimohammadlou, “Toward equation structural modeling: an integration of interpretive structural modeling and structural equation modeling,” J. Manag. Anal., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 693–714, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1080/23270012.2021.1881927.

S. W. Pain, Safety, Health, and Environmental Auditing: A Practical Guide. CRc Press, 2010.

J. White, Health and Safety Management: An Alternative Approach to Reducing Accidents, Injury and Illness at Work. CRC Press, 2018.

A. Tsutsumi, A. Shimazu, and T. Yoshikawa, “Proposed guidelines for primary prevention for mental health at work: an update,” Environ. Occup. Heal. Pract., 2019.

K. Kakimoto, “Is the workplace wellness program doing good?: ethical considerations around health promotion at workplace,” Environ. Occup. Heal. Pract., vol. 2, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1539/eohp.2020-0016-RA.

T. Yokogawa, E. Yoshikawa, H. Abe, S. Tateishi, and K. Mori, “Competencies of occupational health professionals for disaster management based on their own experiences,” Environ. Occup. Heal. Pract., vol. 3, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1539/eohp.2020-0023-OA.

R. Kawano, “Preparation of a scoring-based occupational health management assessment tool and its utilization for the first step to improve workplace,” Environ. Occup. Heal. Pract., vol. 2, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1539/eohp.2020-GPS03.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2024 Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Our Journal indexed by:

ISSN 2477-2399 (online) || ISSN 2580-6424 (print)

View My Stats

Flag Counter