Email this article KONSTRUK ASESMEN LITERASI FUNGSIONAL UNTUK SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA
Beniati Lestyarini, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Dwi Hanti Rahayu, Univesitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
Literasi fungsional menyiratkan bahwa literasi dapat digunakan untuk meningkatkan kapasitas masyarakat, meraih tujuan, dan meningkatkan kemampuan diri. Penelitian validatif ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi konstruk asesmen literasi fungsional untuk siswa SMP dan mengalisis butir soalnya dengan Model Rasch. Data penelitian ini dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara, FGD, dan tes. Sebanyak 5 orang guru dan 246 siswa dari 5 SMP di DIY, serta 3 pakar dilibatkan dalam proses pengumpulan data. Hasil penelitian berupa konstruk literasi fungsional dari National Assessment for Adult Literacy (NAAL) dimodifikasi dalam 15 jenis literasi, yaitu literasi prosa, digital, dokumen, numerik, lingkungan, kesehatan, pariwisata, transportasi, keselamatan jalan, kesantunan berbahasa, mitigasi bencana, finansial, budaya, visual, dan sosial. Hasil analisis 60 butir soal dengan Model Rasch berbantuan program QUEST menunjukkan probability level 0,50 dengan indeks reliabilitas 0,98. Mean INFIT MNSQ sebesar 1.00 dengan SD 0,04 yang fit dengan Model Rasch. Butir soal yang layak berada pada rentang threshold (± 2) adalah 51 buah (85%), sedangkan yang di luar rentang tersebut 9 butir (15%). Siswa dengan skor ≥75 sebesar 38,2%, sedang yang belum memenuhi standar sebanyak 61,8%. Indikator esensial dan batang soal menjadi bagian penting untuk melihat kemampuan literasi fungsional siswa.
Kata kunci: literasi fungsional, asesmen, analisis butir soal, Model Rasch
THE CONSTRUCTS OF FUNCTIONAL LITERACY ASSESSMENT
FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS
Abstract
Functional literacy implies that literacy can be used for improving society capacities, obtaining goals, and increasing self-capabilities. The present study is aimed at identifying the constructs of the functional literacy assessment of junior high school students and analysing the item responses by using the Rasch Model. The data were collected through observation, interview, FGD and testing. Five teachers, 246 students from five junior high schools in Yogyakarta Province, and 3 experts were involved in the research processes. Results show that the constructs of the functional literacy from the National Assessment for Adult Literacy (NAAL) concepts have been modified into 15 types of literacy: prose, digital, document, numerical, environmental, health, tourism, transportation, road safety, language civility, disaster mitigation, financial, cultural, visual, and social). The results of the item analysis (60 items) using the Rasch Model with the QUEST program produce a probability value of 0.50 with a reliability index of 0.98. The INFIT MNSQ mean of 1.00 with an SD of 0.4 fits with the Rasch model. Items are eligible for an appropriate threshold range (± 2) of 51 grains or 85% while items outside the range of ± 2 is 9 (15%). Students with a score of ≥ 75 are 94 in number (38.2%). Meanwhile, students who have not fulfilled the standard amount to 61.8%. Essential indicators and item stems have an important role in reflecting the students’ functional literacy competences.
Keywords: functional literacy, assessment, item response, Rasch model
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bohannon, J.L. (2015). Not a Stitch out of Place: Assessing Students’ Attitudes Towards Multimodal Composition, Bellaterra Journal of Teaching Language & Literature, 8(2), 33-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.631.
Campbell, A., Kirsch, I.S., & Kolstad, A. (1992). Assessing literacy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Cocchiarella, C. (2018). What is Functional Literacy, and why does our high-tech society need it? Mindful Technics, a Technology Education Site and Blog for Geeks, December 30. https://mindfultechnics.com/what-is-functional-literacy/.
Dolenc, K., Aberšek, B., & Aberšek, M.K. (2015). Online functional literacy, intelligent tutoring systems and science education, Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(2), 162-171. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277103289_Online_functional_literacy_intelligent_tutoring_systems_and_science_education.
Fraire, P. (2005). Education for Critical Consciousness. London: Continuum.
Harsiati, T. 2018. Karakteristik Soal Literasi Membaca pada ProGram PISA. Litera, 17(1),90-106. Doi: https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/litera/article/view/19048/pdf.
Hauser, R.M. 2005. Measuring Literacy: Performance Level for Adult. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Janjic-Watrich, V. 2009. “The cambridge handbook of literacy” by Olson, D.R. & Torrance, R. (Eds). Books Review. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, Winter, 55,4. http://www.proquest/umi/pqd.web.
Kirsch, I., Yamamoto, K., Norris, N., Rock, D., Jungeblut, A., O’Reilly, P., Berlin, M., Mohandjer, L., Waksberg, J., Goksel, H., Burke, J., Rieger, S., Green, J., Klein, M., Campbell, A., Jenkins, L., Kolstad, A., Mosenthal, P., and Baldi, S. (2001). Technical report and data file user’s manual for the 1992 national adult literacy survey. (NCES No. 2001-457.) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Leech, G.N. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mullis, I.V.S. & Martin, M.O. (2015). PIRLS 2016, Assessment Framework (2nd edition). International Association for for the Evalution of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Mumpuni, A. & Nurpratiwiningsih, L. (2018). The Development of a Web-Based Learning to Improve of a Creative Writing Ability of PGSD Students, Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(2), 321-322. DOI: 10.21831/cp.v37i2.20009.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Knows and Can Do, Student Performance Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume I). PISA, OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2018). PISA 2015 Results in Focus. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf.
Olaniran, S.O. (2020). Literacy Library and the Functional Literacy Skills of the 21st Century Adult Learners, Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 3573. 1-12. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3573.
Ostini, R & Mering, M. (2006). Polytomus Item Response Theory Models. New York: SAGE Publication.
Park, Y. 2008. Patterns and predictors of elemnetary students’ reading performance: evidence from the data of the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS). ProQuest Dessertasion and Theses. http://www.proquest/umi/pqd.web.
Permendikbud no 21 Tahun 2015 tentang Gerakan Pembudayaan Karakter di Sekolah.
Shepherd, R. & Goggin, P. (2012). Reclaiming “Old” Literacies in the New Literacy Information Age: The Functional Literacies of the Mediated Workstation, Composition Studies, 40(2), 66–91.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/compstud.40.2.0066.
Suryaman, M. (2015). Analisis Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Dalam Literasi Membaca Melalui Studi Internasional (Pirls) 2011, Litera, Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 14(1), 170-186. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/litera/article/view/4416.
The New London Group (2005). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures, in Cope, B & Kalantziz, M (eds). Multiliteracies: Literary Learning and the Design of Social Futures, South Yarra: Macmillan (pp. 9-38).
The New London Group. (1996). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures, Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u.
van Berkom, M.L. (2009). Measurement and Statistics for Teacher, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Winahyu, A.I. (2018). Hasil PISA 2018, Kemampuan Siswa Indonesia Turun. Humaniora, 4 Desember.
Wright & Master, G.N. (1982). Rating Scale Analysis. Chicago: Mesa Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v19i2.32977
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
______________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
The International Journal of Linguistic, Literature, and Its Teaching at http://http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/litera/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
__________________________________________________________________________________________________