THE USE OF MALAY MODALITIES IN ABSTRACTS OF PROCEDA SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES JOURNALS

Mirsa Umiyati; Rika Purnama Sari

doi:10.21831/ltr.v19i3.30520

THE USE OF MALAY MODALITIES IN ABSTRACTS OF PROCEDA SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES JOURNALS

Mirsa Umiyati, Universitas Warmadewa, Indonesia
Rika Purnama Sari, Universitas Warmadewa, Indonesia

10.21831/ltr.v19i3.30520

Abstract

An abstract of research article should give information obviously. Modalities assist researcher to provide certain obvious information in an abstract. This study important to carry out to identify the types and functions of Malay modality used in abstracts of Proceda Social and Behavioral Sciences journal and examine the types of modality that are dominantly used in abstracts of Proceda Social and Behavioral Sciences journal. Qualitative and quantitative methods are the design of this study. Data of this study are abstracts from 18 articles of Proceda Social and Behavioral Sciences journal published by Elsevier. The data were analyzed using intralingual equivalent method by applying hubung banding menyamakan (HBS) technique. The results of the analysis are then presented using informal methods. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that there are four types of Malay modalities used in the abstracts of the Proceda Social and Behavioral Sciences journal, namely intentional, epistemic, deontic, and dynamic modalities. In addition, phrasal modals or periphrastic modals are found in the abstract in question. The dominant type of modality used in the abstract is intentional modality of 31%. Furthermore, the Malay modality used in the abstract articles of the Proceda Social and Behavioral Sciences journal indicates the existence of this modal function in abstract construction. The functions of the modals are to inform the aims or objectives, focus, problem, background and gap, method, technique analysis, and suggestion of the research.

Keywords: abstract, malay, types of modalities

PENGGUNAAN MODALITAS BAHASA MELAYU PADA ABSTRAK

JURNAL PROCEDA SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Abstrak

Abstrak dalam artikel penelitian harus memberikan infomasi yang jelas. Modalitas dapat membantu peneliti untuk memberikaninformasi tertentu secara jelas dalam absrtrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi jenis-jenis dan fungsi modalitas bahasa Melayu yang digunakan pada abstrak jurnal proceda social and behavioral sciences dan mengkaji jenis modalitas yang dominan digunakan pada abstrak jurnal proceda social and behavioral sciences. Metode qualitative dan quantitative adalah desain dari penelitian ini. Data penelitian ini adalah abstrak dari 18 artikel pada jurnal Proceda Social and Behavioral Sciences yang berbahasa melayu yang dipublikasikan oleh Elsevier. Dalam menganalisis data, digunakan metode padan intralingual dengan menerapkan teknik hubung banding menyamakan (HBS). Hasil analisis kemudian disajikan dengan menggunakan metode informal. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa terdapat empat jenis modalitas bahasa Melayu yang digunakan pada abstrak jurnal Proceda Social and Behavioral Sciences, yaitu modalitas intensional, epistemic, deontic, dan dinamik. Selain itu ditemukan phrasal modals or periphrastic modals pada abstrak yang dimaksud. Jenis modalitas yang dominan digunakan dalam abstrak tersebut ialah modalitas intensional sebesar 31%. Selanjutnya, modalitas bahasa Melayu yang digunakan pada abstrak artikel jurnal Proceda Social and Behavioral Sciences mengindikasikan adanya fungsi modal tersebut pada konstruksi abstrak.

Kata kunci: abstrak, bahasa melayu, jenis modalitas

Keywords

Types of Modalities, Malay, Abstract

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adawiah, R. (2017). Modalities Used by Indonesian and American in Political Debate Discourse (A Comparative Studies). Jurnal Adabiyah, 17(1), 1–20.

Ajar, S., & Ahmad, S. (2014). Kontrak sosial dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran lisan: tinjauan terhadap perspektif pelajar. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 276–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.249

Altenberg, E., & Vago, R. (2010). English Grammar: Understanding the Basic. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.111.479.1009-a

Alwi, H. (1990). Modalitas dalam Bahasa Indonesia (Seri ILDEP). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.

Ardiansah, D. (2015). An Analysis of Modality in Students’ Hortatory Exposition Texts (Systemic Functional Grammar Perspective). Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(2), 136. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v15i2.1236

Asliza, N., & Abd, N. (2014). Strategi komunikasi lisan secara formal dalam kalangan pelajar kejuruteraan. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.260

Baharudin, M. (2014). Pemerolehan dan penguasaan kecekapan berbahasa Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar asing di Universiti Sains Malaysia. 134, 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.248

Barin, S., & Fikri, A. (2014). Analisis Leksikografi Perkataan dalam Al-Qur’an Al-Karim: Antara Pisang dan Umm Ghailan. 134, 426–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.265

Bating, H. (2014). Karya Cerpen Kadazandusun dalam Konteks Kurikulum. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.257

Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language in Professional Settings. London: Longman.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Coates, J. (1983). The Semantics of The Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Darmia, S. (2014). Cabaran dan Reaksi Pelaksanaan Bahasa Kebangsaan dalam Bidang Pentadbiran dan Pendidikan di Malaysia , 1957-1966. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.253

Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd ed.). Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/dell/Downloads/Suzanne Eggins - An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2005, Continuum).pdf-downloaded library genesis

Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing Functional Grammar. Bandung: PT. Dunia Pustaka Jaya.

Erwany, L., & Rosliani. (2018). Modalitas Dalam Bahasa Melayu Dialek Deli. Daun Lontar, 7(2), 25–49.

Frawley, W. (2006). The Expression of Modality. Retrieved from http://dnb.ddb.de.

Ghivirigă, T., & Baciu, L. C. (2015). Between Epistemic and Deontic: The Use of Modal Verbs in a Corpus of Romanian Scientific Texts on Economics. SGEM 2015 International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts.

Grangé, P. (2010). Aspect and modality in Indonesian The case of sudah, telah, pernah, and sempat. Wacana, Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, 12(2), 243. https://doi.org/10.17510/wjhi.v12i2.117

Halliday, M. A. . (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. ., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://www.functionalmedicine.org/files/library/Intro_Functional_Medicine.pdf

Hardjanto, T. D. (2016). Hedging Through the Use of Modal Auxiliaries in English Academic Discourse. Jurnal Humaniora, 28(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v28i1.11412

Hasniza, C., & Yusri, M. (2014). Kajian Penerokaan Buli Siber dalam Kalangan Pelajar UMT. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.255

Hoye, L. F. (2005). ‘“You may think that; I couldn’t possibly comment!”’ Modality studies: Contemporary research and future directions. Part I. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1295–1321. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.004

Hykes, J. M. (2000). A comparison of the use of modal verbs in research articles by professionals and non-native speaking graduate students. Lowa State University.

Jaidi, N., Abdullah, Y., Tarasat, S., & Kartika, S. (2014). Kesan penggunaan perisian iMindMap dalam penulisan karangan jenis rencana. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.261

Kartika, S., Adikasuma, M., Tarasat, S., Bakar, A., & Jaidi, N. (2014). Kesan bahan visual dalam penulisan karangan Bahasa Melayu. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.268

Kim, Y.-B. (2017). Modal Categories and Dynamic Modality in English. National Research Foundation of Korea, 17(4), 701–727. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.17.4.201712.701

Knežević, B., & Brdar, I. (2011). Modals and Modality in Translation: A Case Study Based Approach. Jezikoslovlje, 12(2), 117–145.

Kurniasih, U. (2019). Perubahan Penggunaan Modalitas Intensional Dalam Bahasa Melayu Dan Bahasa Indonesia. DISASTRA, 1(1), 53–59.

Lycan, W. G. (1994). Modality and Meaning (Vol. 53). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Mahsun. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan, Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya (Edisi Keti). Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Mohamad, Z., & Azma, Z. (2014). Sikap dan motivasi pelajar terhadap pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.263

Muhamad, B., & Ag, S. (2014). Analisis al-maf’uk al-mutlaq dalam surah-surah al-mufassal: Satu kajian kemukjizatan linguistik al-Quran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.250

Muna, W., & Subramaniam, V. (2014). Daya kreativiti kanak-kanak: Satu kajian kes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.266

Mustafa, R., Mohd, R., Sarbini-zin, M., & Robiah, W. (2014). Amalan perubatan tradisional masyarakat Melayu Sarawak. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.254

Nasution, M. K. M. (2017). Abstrak - Suatu Karya Ilmiah. ResearchGate, (3), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14333.26086

Ngula, R. S. (2017). Epistemic modal verbs in research articles written by ghanaian and international scholars: A corpus-based study of three disciplines. Brno Studies in English, 43(2), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2017-2-1

Olaniyan, K. K., & Adeolu, A. (2015). Modality in Statement of Objectives in Arts-Based Research Article Abstracts. British Journal of English Linguistics, 3(1), 42–51. Retrieved from www.eajournals.org

Omar, A. (2014). Pemerkasaan Pemikiran Inventif di Negara Brunei Darussalam: Satu Percubaan Awal Pengajaran dan Pembelajarannya dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.264

Piqué-Angordans, J., Posteguillo, S., & Andreu-Besó, J.-V. (2002). Epistemic and Deontic Modality: A Linguistic Indicator of Disciplinary Variation in Academic English. LSP & Professional Communication, 2(2).

Prihantoro, E., & Fitriani, D. R. (2015). Modalitas Dalam Teks Berita Media Online. Prosiding PESAT (Psikologi, Ekonomi, Sastra, Arsitektur &Teknik Sipil) Universitas Gunadarma, 6, 17–25.

Priyastuti, M. T. (2020). Penggunaan Modal Verbs Bahasa Inggris dalam Keterampilan berbicara. Journal of Language and Health, 1(1), 11–20.

Radovanović, A. (2017). Dynamic Modals-English and Serbian Contrasted. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS: Series Linguistics and Literature, 15(2), 273–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22190/FULL1702273R

Rizomilioti, V. (2006). Exploring Epistemic Modality in Academic Discourse Using Corpora. In L. van Lier (Ed.), Information Technology in Languages for Specific Purposes: Issues and Prospects. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

Slameto. (2016). Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah Hasil Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Scholaria, 6(2), 46–57.

Suhadi, J. (2011). Epistemic Modality and Deontic Modality: Two Sides of a Coin. JULISA, 11(2), 156–179.

Swales, J. (1993). Genre Analysis: English in Academic & Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taisin, N. J. (2014). Genre puisi lisan tradisional Kadazandusun ( sudawil ): bahasa perlambangan dalam sudawil percintaan dan kasih sayang dari dimensi alam dan budaya. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.251

Tarasat, S., & Daud, A. (2014). Kesan penggunaan perisian asas membaca terhadap pencapaian membaca murid peringkat prasekolah. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.262

Touriño, A. V. (2001). Dynamic modality: English and Spanish contrasted. Studies in Contrastive Linguistics. Proceedings of the 2nd International Contrastive Linguistics Conference. Santiago: Santiago de Compostela.

Vázquez, I., & Giner, D. (2008). Beyond Mood and Modality: Epistemic Modality Markers as Hedges in Research Articles. A Cross-Disciplinary Study. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 21, 171–190.

Vold, E. T. (2006). Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00106.x

Winiharti, M. (2012). The Difference Between Modal Verbs in Deontic and Epistemic Modality. HUMANIORA, 3(2), 532–539.

Zaim, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Padang: FBS UNP Press Padang.

Zakaria, N. B. (2014). Peranan Pengarang Tradisi dalam Melahirkan Masyarakat Pemikir. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.247

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v19i3.30520