Dampak Melatihkan Pengintegrasian Hukum Newton dalam Pembelajaran Prinsip Archimedes melalui Program Resitasi terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa

Irvany Nurita Pebriana, Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Tsania Nur Diyana, Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
Sutopo Sutopo, Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


Telah dikembangkan program resitasi berbantuan komputer yang dapat digunakan untuk melatihkan mahasiswa mengintegrasikan hukum Newton dalam menyelesaikan persoalan terkait prinsip Archimedes. Penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk mengetahui efektivitas program resitasi terhadap pamahaman konsep mahasiswa. Sesuai dengan tujuan tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan mixed method desain embedded experimental model. Instrumen tes berupa 8 soal pilihan ganda beralasan dengan 20 mahasiswa S1 Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Negeri Malang sebagai subyek penelitian. Hasilnya, program resitasi ini efektif dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep mahasiswa secara signifikan terutama kemampuan menentukan besar dan arah gaya-gaya yang bekerja pada benda yang dicelupkan dalam fluida. Akan tetapi, program ini kurang efektif dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berikut, (1) menjelaskan pengaruh percepatan gravitasi terhadap banyaknya volume benda yang tercelup dalam fluida, (2) menentukan posisi benda yang tercelup dalam fluida setelah tercapai kesetimbangan, dan (3) menentukan besar gaya angkat yang dialami oleh benda identik yang dicelupkan dalam fluida yang berbeda.


Keywords


resitasi, hukum Newton, prinsip Archimedes, pemahaman konsep

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afwa, I. L., Latifah, E., Fisika, P., & Malang, P. N. (2016). Deep Learning Question Untuk. 2013, 434–447.

Andrea A, D. (2011). Toward an Epistemology of Physics Toward an Epistemology of Physics. Cognition and Instruction, 2–3(September 2014).

Bagus, I. J. R., Wartono, & Sutopo. (2016). Dampak Program Resitasi Terhadap Topik Hukum Iii Newton. Pendidikan, 1(2), 256–264.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research | SAGE Publications Ltd. In SAGE Publications, Inc.

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119

Docktor, J. L., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2012). Impact of a short intervention on novices’ categorization criteria. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020102

Gladding, G., Gutmann, B., Schroeder, N., & Stelzer, T. (2015). Clinical study of student learning using mastery style versus immediate feedback online activities. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.010114

Goszewski, M., Moyer, A., Bazan, Z., & Wagner, D. J. (2013). Exploring student difficulties with pressure in a fluid. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789675

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods : A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. May 1996, 64–74.

Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2011). (TL) Resources, framing and transfer. Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective, 20(1).

Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., Redish, E. F., Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2004). Resources , framing , and transfer Resources , framing , and transfer. Rec 0087519, 1–26.

Heckler, A. F., & Mikula, B. D. (2016). Factors affecting learning of vector math from computer-based practice: Feedback complexity and prior knowledge. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010134

Heuvelen, A. Van, Zou, X., Heuvelen, A. Van, & Zou, X. (2001). Multiple representations of work – energy processes Multiple representations of work – energy processes. 184. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1286662

Husain, M. S., Kendek, Y., & Fihrin, F. (2018). Analisis Tingkat Pemahaman Konsep Fluida Statis dan Penerapannya di Lingkungan Sekitar pada Siswa SMA Negeri 2 Palu. JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.22487/j25805924.2018.v6.i1.10015

Koenig, K. M., Endorf, R. J., & Braun, G. A. (2007). Effectiveness of different tutorial recitation teaching methods and its implications for TA training. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010104

Loverude, M. E. (2009). A research-based interactive lecture demonstration on sinking and floating. American Journal of Physics, 77(10). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3191688

Loverude, Michael E., Kautz, C. H., & Heron, P. R. L. (2003). Helping students develop an understanding of Archimedes’ principle. I. Research on student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 71(11). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1607335

Ogilvie, C. A. (2009). Changes in students ’ problem-solving strategies in a course that includes context-rich , multifaceted problems. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020102

Prastiwi, V. D., Parno, P., & Wisodo, H. (2018). Identifikasi pemahaman konsep dan penalaran ilmiah siswa SMA pada materi fluida statis. Momentum: Physics Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v1i1.2216

Reyza, M., Taqwa, A., & Hidayat, A. (2013). Deskripsi Penggunaan Program Resitasi dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membangun Free-Body Diagrams ( FBDs ). 5(1), 52–58.

Ryan, Q. X., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., & Mason, A. (2016). Computer problem-solving coaches for introductory physics: Design and usability studies. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010105

Sofiuddin, M. B., Kusairi, S., & Sutopo. (2018). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep Siswa SMA Pada Materi Fluida Statis. Jurnal Pendidikan - Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(2012).

Thacker, B., Dulli, H., Pattillo, D., & West, K. (2014). Lessons from a large-scale assessment: Results from conceptual inventories. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020104

Wagner, D. J., Cohen, S., & Moyer, A. (2009). Addressing student difficulties with buoyancy. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1179. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3266739

Wagner, Doris J., Carbone, E., & Lindow, A. (2014). Exploring Student Difficulties with Buoyancy. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2013.pr.077

Warren, A. R. (2010). Impact of teaching students to use evaluation strategies. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2), 1–12.

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020103

Widodo, L., Yuliati, L., & Parno. (2017). Eksplorasi Penguasaan Konsep Awal Siswa pada Materi Fluida Statis. Pros. Seminar Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, 2.

Yerushalmi, E., Cohen, E., Mason, A., & Singh, C. (2012). What do students do when asked to diagnose their mistakes? Does it help them? I. An atypical quiz context. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020109




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v7i2.39720

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Irvany Nurita Pebriana, Tsania Nur Diyana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPMS Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains

 

 


Creative Commons License
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpms is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All rights reserved.

View JPMS Stats

==========================================================================================================

Supervised by:

RJI Main logo