Promoting freedom learning implementation through self-determined learning: A study of students perspectives

Kartika Isna Sujati, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Amir Syamsudin, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Delyanti Azzumarito Pulungan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Ernita Apriani, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Nimas Putri Dewi Puspitaningrum, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


This study is aimed to describe the students' perspective towards self-determined learning to promote freedom learning implementation. The survey research design with clustered sampling technique was used to collect 380 senior high school students' responses. The questionnaire that was used in the survey have validated using Pearson Product Moment and reliably known by the Alpha-Cronbach score. Descriptive statistics used as the data analytical technique to describe the senior high students' perspective towards self-determined learning to promote the freedom learning implementation. The results showed that freedom learning fundamental points have similar points with self-determined learning principles consisting of heutagogy and autonomous learning skills. The main conclusion concludes that the students' perspective toward self-determined learning could promote freedom learning implementation. The study's recommendations are be expanded the cluster sampling and be emerged the survey in the case during and after the Covid-19 pandemic the that is indirectly fostering the students' heutagogy and autonomous skill by emphasizing self-determined learning.


Keywords


freedom learning, self-determined learning, senior high student

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, P. (2014). Self-Determined Learning: Heutagogy in Action. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(4), 476–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2014.970798

Agonács, N., & Matos, J. F. (2019). Heutagogy and self-determined learning: a review of the published literature on the application and implementation of the theory. Open Learning, 34(3), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1562329

Ashton, J., & Newman, L. (2006). An unfinished symphony: 21st century teacher education using knowledge creating heutagogies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 825–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00662.x

Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcome and Satisfaction in Online Learning during the Pandemic of COVID19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292

Barde, P., & Barde, M. (2012). What to use to express the variability of data: Standard deviation or standard error of mean? Perspectives in Clinical Research, 3(3), 113. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.100662

Bass, R. (2012). Disrupting Ourselves: The Problem of Learning in Higher Education The Post-Course Era. Educause Review, 47(2), 1–14.

Betts, G. (2003). The Autonomous Learning Model for High School Programming. Gifted Education Communicator, California Association for the Gifted, (Fall/Winter), 38–41, 60–61.

Blaschke, L. M. (2016). Heutagogy and Lifelong Learning: A Review of Heutagogical Practice and Self-Determined Learning Abstract. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 89(244), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2281.12135

Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43(1), 1–19. Retrieved from http://foruminnova.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/minds_on_fire.pdf

Çakici, D. (2015). Autonomy in Language Teaching and Learning Process. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.17679/iuefd.16168538

Chan, V. (2001a). Learning autonomously: The learners’ perspectives. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770120077649

Chan, V. (2001b). Readiness for Learner Autonomy: What do our learners tell us? Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120078045

Clarke, V. A., Ruffin, C. L., Hill, D. J., & Beamen, A. L. (1992). Ratings of Orally Presented Verbal Expressions of Probability by a Heterogeneous Sample. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(8), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00995.x

Cowan, J. (2011). Freedom to Learn: A Radically Revised Pedagogy to Facilitate Lifewide Learning in the Academic Curriculum. In N. J. Jackson (Ed.), Learning for a Complex World: A Lifewide Concept of Learning, Education and Personal Development (pp. 122–136). United States of America: AuthorHouse.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. (Fourth Edi). United States of America: Pearson Education Inc.

Dam, L. (2011). Developing Learner Autonomy with School Kids: Principles, Practices, Results. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 40–51). Turkey: Zirve University, Gaziantep.

De Bruijn, E., & Leeman, Y. (2011). Authentic and self-directed learning in vocational education: Challenges to vocational educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 694–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.007

Esch, E. (1996). Promoting Learner Autonomy: Criteria for the Selection of Appropriate Methods. In R. Pemberton, E. S. L. Li, W. W. F. Or, & H. D. Pierson (Eds.), Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 35–48). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Fitriani Lubis. (2019). Education in the Disruption Era. Britain International of Linguistics Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal, 1(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.33258/biolae.v1i2.85

Furtak, E. M., & Kunter, M. (2012). Effects of autonomy-supportive teaching on student learning and motivation. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 284–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.573019

Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1995). Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology. United States of America: Allyn & Bacon.

Goldman, Z. W., Goodboy, A. K., & Weber, K. (2017). College Students’ Psychological Needs and Intrinsic Motivation to Learn: An Examination of Self-Determination Theory. Communication Quarterly, 65(2), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2016.1215338

Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A Child of Complexity Theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8766

Hedge, N., & MacKenzie, A. (2016). Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence: a defence of autonomy and personhood. Oxford Review of Education, 42(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1128890

Hendrawansyah, & Zamroni. (2020). Evaluasi Kebijakan Sistem Zonasi dalam Penerimaan Siswa Baru Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v4i1.27007

Herţanu, C.-L. (2020). Future Education within Disruptive Technologies Developments. International Conference Knowledge-Based Organization, 26(2), 288–293. https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2020-0092

Jones, C., Penaluna, K., & Penaluna, A. (2019). The promise of andragogy, heutagogy and academagogy to enterprise and entrepreneurship education pedagogy. Education and Training, 61(9), 1170–1186. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2018-0211

Joseph, S., Murphy, D., & Holford, J. (2020). Positive education: A new look at Freedom to Learn. Oxford Review of Education, 00(00), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1726310

Keats, D. W., & Schmidt, J. P. (2007). The Genesis and Emergence of Education 3.0 in Higher Education and Its Potential for Africa. First Monday, 12(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i3.1625

Kenyon, C., & Hase, S. (2001). Moving from andragogy to heutagogy in vocational education. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association (AVETRA) Conference, 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.avetra.org.au/abstracts_and_papers_2001/Hase-Kenyon_full.pdf

Kenyon, C., & Hase, S. (2013). Heutagogy Fundamentals. In S. Hase & C. Kenyon (Eds.), Self-Determined Learning: Heutagogy in Action (pp. 7–18). London: Bloomsburry Academic, Bloomsburry Publishing Plc.

Lemke, J. L., & Sabelli, N. H. (2008). Complex Systems and Educational Change: Towards a new research agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00401.x

Little, D. (1996). Freedom to Learn and Compulsion to Interact: Promoting Learner Autonomy through the Use of Information Systems and Information Technologies. In Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 203–218). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Little, D. (2007). Language Learner Autonomy: Some Fundamental Considerations Revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt040.0

Lo, Y. F. (2010). Implementing reflective portfolios for promoting autonomous learning among EFL college students in Taiwan. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809346509

Minister of Education and Culture of Republic of Indonesia. (2019). Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar (Freedom Learning Policy). Retrieved from December 2019 website: https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/03/mendikbud-terbitkan-se-tentang-pelaksanaan-pendidikan-dalam-masa-darurat-covid19

Ministry of Education and Culture of Republic Indonesia. (2018). Reformasi Pendidikan Nasional Melalui Merdeka Belajar (National Education Reformation through The Freedom Learning).

Motschnig-pitrik, R., & Holzinger, A. (2002). Student-Centered Teaching Meets New Media: Concept and Case Study. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 5(4), 160–172.

Purfitasari, S., Prihatin, T., Masrukhi, & Mulyono, S. E. (2020). Teacher Supervision Models for Answering Educational Challenges in the Era of Disruption. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 443(Iset 2019), 457–460. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.089

Ramli, N., Muljono, P., & Afendi, F. M. (2018). Faktor-faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Self Directed Learning Readiness dan Prestasi Akademik. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 2(1), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v2i1.15307

Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to Learn. Colombus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

Rusli, R., Rahman, A., & Abdullah, H. (2020). Student perception data on online learning using heutagogy approach in the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences of Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia. Data in Brief, 29, 105152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105152

Samin, S. M. (2019). Heutagogy in Arabic Class: How It Is Applied in The Islamic Education Study Program of Universitas Islam Riau. Journal of Arabic Linguistics and Education, 5(1), 20–29.

Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007

Settersten, R. A., Bernardi, L., Härkönen, J., Antonucci, T. C., Dykstra, P. A., Heckhausen, J., … Thomson, E. (2020). Understanding the effects of Covid-19 through a life course lens. Advances in Life Course Research, 45(July), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100360

Siddhpura, A., V, I., & Siddhpura, M. (2020). Current state of research in application of disruptive technologies in engineering education. Procedia Computer Science, 172(2019), 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.163

Sumintono, S. (2017). Science Education in Malaysia: Challenges in The 21st Century. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 3, 459–471. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i3.16761

Suyanta, Laksono, E. W., Fadhilah, N. F., & Rizky, I. (2019). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning on Students’ Self-Regulated Learning of Chemistry Learning. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 3(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v3i2.19695

Triola, M. F. (2012). Elementary Statistics (Eleventh E). Pearson Education Inc.

Vetter, T. R. (2017). Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When, Where, and a Sixth, so What? Anesthesia and Analgesia, 125(5), 1797–1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002471

Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education. In MOOCs and Open Education Around the World. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315751108-1




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v7i1.37374

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

p-ISSN: 2580-5525 || e-ISSN: 2580-5533

Indexed by:

          


Creative Commons License

Jurnal Kependidikan by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Journal Stats