KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI DALAM SOAL UJIAN NASIONAL BAHASA INDONESIA

Sarwiji Suwandi, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Memet Sudaryanto, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Nugraheni Eko Wardani, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Sugit Zulianto, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Chafit Ulya, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Titi Setiyoningsih, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konstruksi higher order thinking skills pada soal ujian nasional Bahasa Indonesia di jenjang SMP. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan content analysis soal ujian nasional SMP. Keabsahan data diuji dengan trianggulasi teori. Teknik analisis data menggunakan model analisis interaktif. Penelitian dilakukan dengan mengonstruksi teori mengenai higher order thinking skills dari beberapa buku, jurnal, dan kajian riset lainnya. Pedoman analisis data dikaji expert melalui content validity oleh Aiken. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa data teks pada soal ujian nasional yang diteskan pada peserta didik mengandung dimensi berpikir kritis dan berpikir kreatif. Peserta tes dituntut untuk mampu menelaah secara kritis dalam kasus-kasus yang disajikan melalui wacana teks soal. Selain itu, peserta tes juga diharapkan mampu menemukan lebih dari satu perspektif untuk mengkaji wacana tersebut. Berdasarkan taksomi Blooms dimensi yang dikonstruk pada soal ujian nasional pada ranah analisis dan evaluasi kebahasaan. Dimensi yang diukur dalam soal ujian nasional belum bisa memproyeksikan kemampuan yang dibutuhkan oleh peserta didik untuk jenjang pendidikan yang lebih tinggi.

HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS IN INDONESIAN LANGUAGE NATIONAL EXAM

This study aimed to analyze the construction of higher order thinking skills in Indonesian national exam questions at the Junior High School level. This study used a qualitative approach with content analysis for Junior High School national exam questions. The validity of the data was tested by theoretical triangulation. The data analysis technique used interactive analysis methods. The research was conducted by constructing a theory about higher order thinking skills from related books, journals, and other research studies. The data analysis guidelines were reviewed by experts through content validity proposed by Aiken. The results showed that the text data on the national exam questions tested on students contained dimensions of critical thinking and creative thinking. Test participants were required to be able to critically analyze the cases presented through the question text discourse. In addition, test participants were also expected to be able to find more than one perspective to study the discourse. Based on Blooms' taxonomy the dimensions constructed in the national exam questions in the realm of language analysis and evaluation. The dimensions measured in the national exam questions have not been able to project the abilities needed by students for higher education levels.


Keywords


higher order thinking skills, ujian nasional, SMP

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. Addison Wesley Longman Inc.

Apino, E., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Developing instructional design to improve mathematical higher order thinking skills of students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1), p. 012100. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012100.

Ariyana, Y., Pudjiastuti, A., Bestary, R., & Zamromi. (2018). Buku pegangan pembelajaran berorientasi pada keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi. Direktorat Jendral Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan.

Asrijanty, A. (2019). Hubungan akreditasi sekolah, hasil ujian nasional, dan indeks integritas ujian nasional. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v4i1.732.

Brookhart, S., & Nitko, A. (2008). Standards for teachers competence in educational assessment of students - developed by the American Federation of Teachers National Council on measurement in Education National Association. Dalam S. M. Brookhart & A. J. Nitko (Eds.), Assessment and grading in classrooms. Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Conklin, W. (2012). Higher-order thinking skills to develop 21st century learners. Teacher Created Materials.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000.

Fisher, A. (2011). Critical thinking an introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Heong, Y. M., Yunos, J. M., Othman, W., Hassan, R., Kiong, T. T., & Mohamad, M. M. (2012). The needs analysis of learning higher order thinking skills for generating ideas. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.265.

Laksono, E. W., Rohaeti, E., Suyanta, & Irwanto. (2017). The evaluation instru-ment of analytical thinking and science process skill in chemistry subject. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(1), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v1i1.8205.

Mainali, B. P. (2013). Higher order thinking in education. Academic Voices: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.3126/av.v2i1.8277.

Miles, M. (1994). Miles and Huberman Chapter 2. Qualitative Data Analysis, 50-72.

Ozgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.846a.

Rahmawati, L. E., Suwandi, S., Saddhono, K., & Setiawan, B. (2019). Construction of test instrument to assess foreign student’s competence of Indonesian language through objective test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1243a.

Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2).

Schmakel, P. O. C. (2008). Early adolescents’ perspectives on motivation and achievement in academics. Urban Education, 43(6), 723-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085907311831.

Seman, S. C., Yusoff, W. M. W., & Embong, R. (2017). Teachers challenges in teaching and learning for higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in primary school. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 7(7), 534-545. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2017.77.534.545

Sudaryanto, M., Mardapi, D., & Hadi, S. (2019). Multimedia-based online test on Indonesian language receptive skills development. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1339(1), p. 012120. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1339/1/012120.

Sumarmo, U., & Nishitani, I. (2010). High level mathematical thinking: Experiments with high school and under graduate students using various approach and strategies. Proceedings of The Faculty of Education, Gunma University, Department of Natural Sciences, 58, 9-22.

Suryaman, M. (2015). Analisis hasil belajar peserta didik dalam literasi membaca melalui studi internasional (PIRLS) 2011. LITERA, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v14i1.4416.

Suwandi, S. (2018, Oktober). Tantangan mewujudkan pembelajaran bahasa dan sastra Indonesia yang efektif di era revolusi industri 4.0. Makalah dipresentasikan dalam Kongres Bahasa Indonesia XI. Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Jakarta.

Triyono, Senam, Jumadi, & Wilujeng, I. (2017). The effects of creative problem solving-based learning towards students’ creativities. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(2), 214-226. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v1i2.9429.

Widiyaningsih, A., & Septiana, T. I. (2019). An analysis of the higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in the national examination of English on junior high school level. ELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 4(2), 138-146.

Winarti, A., Rahmini, A., & Almubarak, A. (2019). The effectiveness of multiple intelligences based collaborative problem solving to improve critical thinking. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 3(2), 172-186. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v3i2.24714.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v5i1.35457

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

p-ISSN: 2580-5525 || e-ISSN: 2580-5533

Indexed by:

          


Creative Commons License

Jurnal Kependidikan by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Journal Stats