DIFUSI MODEL PERUMUSAN KEBIJAKAN SEKOLAH RAMAH ANAK DI KAWASAN PESISIR WISATA

Mami Hajaroh; Lusila Andriani Purwastuti; Rukiyati Rukiyati; Bambang Saptono

doi:10.21831/jk.v4i2.27238

DIFUSI MODEL PERUMUSAN KEBIJAKAN SEKOLAH RAMAH ANAK DI KAWASAN PESISIR WISATA

Mami Hajaroh, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Lusila Andriani Purwastuti, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Rukiyati Rukiyati, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Bambang Saptono, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

10.21831/jk.v4i2.27238

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap hasil difusi model dan mengukur kriteria model sebagai inovasi. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian difusi, model perumusan kebijakan sekolah ramah anak di tingkat satuan pendidikan. Penelitian ini menggunakan mixed qualitrative-quantitative method. Partisipan penelitian ini 10 Sekolah Dasar, total 53 orang.Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara, kuisioner, dokumen, dan diskusi terfokus. Teknik analisis data statistic deskriptif dan analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model perumusan kebijakan sekolah ramah anak memenuhi kriteria bagus sebagai inonasi karena sesuai dengan lima kriteria inovasi yakni keunggulan relatif (relative advantage), kompatibilitas (compatibility),kerumitan (complexity), kemampuan diujicobakan (trialability), dan kemampuan diamati (observability). Hasil difusi juga menunjukkan bahwa sekolah mengadopsi model analisis perumusan kebijakan pendidikan sebagai inovasi. Model ini efektif untuk diterapkan di sekolah untuk menginterpretasi kebijakan dari tingkat makro dan meso ke dalam kebijakan mikro (satuan Pendidikan). Keefektifan tercapai karena adanya kolaborasi yang sinergis antara Tri Pusat Pendidikan (sekolah, masyarakat, dan keluarga) pada tahap intepretasi kebijakan dan program, serta pada tahap pengorganisian dan aplikasi kebijakan sekolah ramah anak.

THE DIFFUSION OF CHILD-FRIENDLY SCHOOL POLICY FORMULATION MODELS AT THE EDUCATION UNIT LEVEL

This study aimed to reveal the results of the diffusion models and measure the criteria of the models as an innovation. This study is diffusion research, a model for formulating child-friendly school policies at the education unit level. This study used a mixed qualitative-quantitative method. The participants of this study were 10 elementary schools, a total of 53 people. The data were collected through interviews, questionnaires, documents, and focused discussions. The data analysis techniques were descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis. The results show that the model for formulating child-friendly school policies met the good criteria as an innovation since it complied with five innovation criteria, namely relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability. The results of the diffusion also show that schools adopt an analytical model of education policy as an innovation. This model is effective to be applied in schools to interpret policies from the macro and meso levels into micro policies (Education units). Effectiveness is achieved due to synergistic collaboration between the Three Education Centers (schools, communities, and families) at the policy and program interpretation stage, as well as at the stage of organizing and applying child-friendly school policies.

Keywords

kebijakan, difusi inovasi, sekolah ramah anak, satuan pendidikan

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alashwal, A. M., Abdul-Rahman, H., & Radzi, J. (2014). Knowledge utili-zation in construction projects: A conceptual framework. Knowledge Management International Conferen-ce, August 2014, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4849.6961

Choudrie, J., Umeoji, E., & Forson, C. (2012). Diffusion of e-government in Nigeria: A qualitative study of culture and gender. Third Annual SIG Globdev Workshop, Toronto, 1-33. http://uhra.herts.ac.uk/handle/2299/8743.

Cowan, R., & Jonard, N. (2001). Knowledge creation, knowledge diffusion and network structure. Dalam A. Kirman & J-B. Zimmermann (Eds.), Economics with heterogeneous interacting agents (pp. 327-343). Springer.

Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693-716.

Das, A., Gollapudi, S., & Kiciman, E. (2014). Effect of persuasion on information diffusion in social networks (Issue MSR-TR-2014-69). research.microsoft. com/pubs/217325/persuasion_2014-05-19. pdf.

Dearing, J. W. (2009). Applying diffusion of innovation theory to intervention development. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 503-518.

Dearing, J. W., & Cox, J. G. (2018). Diffusion of innovations theory, principles, and practice. Health Affairs, 37(2), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1104.

Dearing, J. W., & Singhal, A. (2020). New directions for diffusion of innovations research: Dissemination, implementation, and positive deviance. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.216.

Fry, A., Ryley, T., & Thring, R. (2018). The influence of knowledge and persuasion on the decision to adopt or reject alternative fuel vehicles. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(9), 1-20. doi.org/10.3390/su10092997.

Glasser, W. M. D. (1992). The quality school: Managing students without coersion (2nd expanded ed.). HarperCollins Publishers.

Gilardi, F., Shipan, C. R., & Wüest, B. (2021). Policy diffusion: The issue‐definition stage. American Journal of Political Science, 65(1), 21-35.

Graham, E., Shipan, C., & Volden, C. (2013). The diffusion of policy diffusion research. British Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 673-701.

Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581-629.

Hajaroh, M., & Rukiyati. (2019). Difusi model pendidikan nilai pada anak usia dini melalui lagu dan permainan tradi-sional. Jurnal Kependidikan, 3(1), 1-14.

Hajaroh, M., Rukiyati, Purwastuti, L. A., & Saptono, B. (2017). Analisis kebijakan sekolah ramah anak di kawasan pesisir wisata. Andi Offset.

Harting, J., Rutten, G. M., Rutten, S. T., & Kremers, S. P. (2009). A qualitative application of the diffusion of innovations theory to examine determinants of guideline adherence among physical therapists. Physical Therapy, 89(3), 221-232.

Havelock, R. G., Guskin, A., Frohman, M., Havelock, M., Hill, M., & Huber, J. (1971). Planning for innovation through dissemination and utilization of knowledge. Centre for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge.

Ismail, S. (2006). Detailes review of Roger’s diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 14-23.

Kaminski, J. (2011). Theory in nursing informatics column. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 6(2), 1-7.

Katz, E. (2001). Media effects. Dalam N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 9472–9479). Pergamon. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/04350-3.

Kumar, N. (2015). review of innovation diffusion models. Working Paper, 1, 01. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2413.0728.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications.

OECD, & Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018. Dalam Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement (Issue October). http://oe.cd/oslomanual.

OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en.

Peraturan Menteri Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Tahun 2014 tentang Kebijakan Sekolah Ramah Anak.

Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.

Santoso, B. (2012). Kunci keberhasilan proses pengambilan keputusan. Manajerial, 8(16), 28-33.

Suranto, Hajaroh, M., & Hastasari, C. (2020). Sistem komunikasi tri pusat pendidikan. Tan Kinira. http://avina.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2012/06/9.1-sistem-komunikasi-kelompok.pdf.

Unicef. (2009). Child friendly schools. UNICEF.

Widodo, J. (2010). Analisis kebijakan publik: Konsep dan aplikasi analisis proses kebijakan publik. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).

Wright, C. A. H., Mannathoko, C., & Pasic, M. (2009). Child friendly schools manual. UNICEF.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v4i2.27238