PENERAPAN MODEL PROJECT-BASED LEARNING DALAM MATA DIKLAT GAMBAR SKETSA

Ambiyar Ambiyar; Budi Syahri; Junil Adri; Nurhaliza Nurhaliza; Syaiful Islami

doi:10.21831/jk.v4i1.22353

PENERAPAN MODEL PROJECT-BASED LEARNING DALAM MATA DIKLAT GAMBAR SKETSA

Ambiyar Ambiyar, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Padang
Budi Syahri, FT Universitas Negeri Padang
Junil Adri, FT Universitas Negeri Padang
Nurhaliza Nurhaliza, FT Universitas Negeri Padang
Syaiful Islami, FT Universitas Negeri Padang

10.21831/jk.v4i1.22353

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar, keterampilan, dan hasil belajar Mata Diklat Gambar Sketsa siswa kelas X Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) Semen Padang dengan menerapkan model Project-based learning (PjBL). Penelitian menggunakan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK). Ada dua siklus yang dilakukan dalam penelitian ini. Masing-masing siklus terdiri dari dua kali pertemuan sehingga ada empat pertemuan untuk dua siklus. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas X Teknik Mesin 1 di SMK Semen Padang dengan jumlah 20 siswa. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan adalah lembar observasi, tes objektif, dan rubrik. Lembar observasi digunakan untuk mengamati motivasi belajar, rubrik digunakan untuk menilai keterampilan, dan tes obyektif digunakan untuk menilai hasil belajar siswa. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan statistik deskriptif. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan adanya peningkatan motivasi belajar dan keterampilan siswa dari siklus 1 ke siklus 2 dalam Mata Diklat Gambar Sketsa dengan menerapkan model PjBL. Hasil belajar siswa juga sudah mencapai Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal (KKM).

APPLICATION OF PROJECT-BASED LEARNING MODEL IN SKETCH DRAWING SUBJECT

This study was aimed at improving learning motivation, skills, and learning outcomes in the Sketch Drawing training course for students of tenth grade, Semen Padang Vocational High School by applying Project-based learning (PjBL) model. The study used Classroom Action Research (CAR). There were two cycles carried out in this study. Each cycle consists of two meetings, so there are four meetings for two cycles. The research subjects were 20 students of Class X Mechanical Engineering 1 at Semen Padang Vocational School. The research instruments used were observation sheets, objective tests, and rubrics. The observation sheets were used to observe motivation to learn, rubrics were used to assess skills, and objective tests were used to assess student learning outcomes. The data obtained then were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results show that there is an improvement in learning motivation and student skills from cycle 1 to cycle 2 in the Sketch Drawings by appying PBL model. Student learning outcomes have also reached the Minimum Criteria of Mastery Learning (MCML).

Keywords

project-based learning, motivasi, keterampilan, hasil belajar, gambar sketsa

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ambiyar, (2012). Pengukuran dan tes dalam pendidikan. Padang: UNP Press.

Aqib, Z. (2009). Penelitian tindakan kelas untuk guru SD, SLB, dan TK. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83, 39-43. Diunduh dari https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578933.pdf

Chu, S. K. W., Tse, S. K., & Chow, K. (2011). Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library & Information Science Research, 33(2), 132-143.

Condliffe, B., Quint, J., Visher, M. G., Bangser, M. R., Drohojowska, S., Saco, L., & Nelson, E. (2017). Project-based learning a literature review. Working paper. New York: MDRC.

Finkelstein, N., Hanson, T., Huang, C-W., Hirschman, B., & Huang, M. (2010). Effects of problem based economics on high school economics instruction. California. Institute of Education Sciences

Giesecke, F. E., Mitchell, A., Spencer, H., Hill, I., Dygdon, J., & Novak, J. (2016). Technical drawing with engineering graphics. New York: Prentice Hall.

Goodman, B., & Stivers, J. (2010). Project-based learning. Educational psychology, 2010, 1-8. Diunduh dari http://www.fsmilitary.org/pdf/Project_Based_Learning.pdf.

Griva, E., Semoglou, K., & Geladari, A. (2010). Early foreign language learning: Implementation of a project in a game–based context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3700-3705.

Handayani, R. D. (2017). Analisis motivasi intrinsik dan ekstrinsik mahasiswa calon guru fisika. Jurnal Kependidikan, 1(2), 320-333.

Jensen, K. J. (2015). A meta-analysis of the effects of problem- and project-based learning on academic achievement in grades 6-12 populations. Education Dissertations, 7. Diunduh dari https://digitalcommons.spu.edu/soe_etd/7/.

Kamdi. (2010). Implementasi PjBL di sekolah menengah kejuruan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 98-110.

Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3

Krauss, J., & Boss, S. (2013). Thinking through project-based learning. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Kunandar. (2013). Penilaian autentik (Penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Latisma, D. (2011). Evaluasi pendidikan. Padang: UNP Press.

Madsen, D. A., & Madsen, D. P. (2012). Engineering drawing & design. Australia: Delmar, Cengage Learning.

Muskania, R. T., & Wilujeng, I. (2017). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran project-based learning untuk membekali foundational know-ledge dan meningkatkan scientific literacy. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(1), 34-43.

Parker, W. C., Mosborg, S., Bransford, J., Vye, N., Wilkerson, J., & Abbott, R. (2011). Rethinking advanced high school coursework: Tackling the depth/breadth tension in the AP US government and politics course. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(4), 533-559.

Phillips, D. K., & Carr, K. (2014). Becoming a teacher through action research. Process, context, and self-study. New York: Routledge.

Primawati, Ambiyar, & Ramadhani, D. (2017). Peningkatan aktivitas dan hasil belajar siswa menggunakan metode talking stick. Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional dan Teknologi, 17(1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek/vol17-iss1/23.

Rathnam, K. (2018). A first course in engineering drawing. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

Rochayati, U., & Wardani, R. (2018). Model pembelajaran karakter kerja di sekolah menengah kejuruan. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(1), 116-127.

Sani, R. A. (2014). Pembelajaran saintefik untuk implementasi kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sani, R. A. (2016). Penilaian autentik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Saputra, R. D. (2016a). Penerapan metode pembelajaran PjBL (PBL) untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar kompetensi Computerised Aided Design (CAD) dengan software inven-tor siswa kelas XI Teknik Pemesinan di SMK Negeri 2 Klaten (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Saputra, Y. E. (2016b). Penerapan metode pembelajaran project-based learning (PjBL) untuk meningkatkan keaktifan dan hasil belajar perekayasaan sistem kontrol siswa kelas XII EI 3 SMK N 3 Wonogiri (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Schuetz, R. (2018). Project-based learning: Benefits, examples, and resources. Diunduh dari https://www.schoology.com/blog/project-based-learning-pbl-benefits-examples-and-resources.

Syahri, B., Syahril, & Yuliana. (2015, Oktober). Strategi pembelajaran problem solving di SMK N 10 Padang. Makalah dipersentasikan pada 3rd International Conference on Technical and Vocation Education and Training (TVET). Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Padang, Bukittinggi.

Syamsuriyanti, & Sukirno. (2018). Faktor determinan profesionalisme guru. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(1), 56-67.

Wena, M. (2014). Strategi pembelajaran inovatif kontemporer: Satuan tinjauan konseptual operasional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v4i1.22353