Pengaruh recovery aktif dan pasif terhadap daya tahan otot

Rizki Mulyawan

doi:10.21831/medikora.v19i1.30886

Pengaruh recovery aktif dan pasif terhadap daya tahan otot

Rizki Mulyawan, Department of Health and Recreation Education, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/medikora.v19i1.30886

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menginvestigasi seberapa besar efek dari recovery aktif dan pasif terhadap kemampuan dalam melakukan angkatan dumbell sampai lelah (kemampuan daya tahan), agar dapat diketahui bagaimana efektivitas recovery terhadap kemampuan daya tahan otot lengan berikutnya. Menggunakan teknik purposive sampling diperoleh 23 subjek penelitian yang dibagi ke dalam tiga kelompok, yaitu kelompok recovery pasif ditambah penggunaan manset sphygmomanometer (RPMS), recovery aktif (RA), dan recovery pasif selama 3 menit (RP3) sebagai kontrol. Desain penelitian menggunakan One Pretest and Posttest Design, dengan single blind study. Subjek penelitian mengangkat dumbell sampai lelah (daya tahan), kemudian melakukan satu dari tiga bentuk recovery, dilanjutkan dengan pengangkatan dumbell kembali sampai lelah. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbedaan pengaruh antara recovery aktif (RA) dan pasif (RPMS dan (RP3). Namun jika ditelaah lebih mendalam pada setiap kelompoknya, hanya RP3 yang tidak mengalami penurunan daya tahan secara signifikan (0,186 > 0,05) jika dibandingkan dengan RPMS (0,000 < 0,01) dan RA (0,007 < 0,05). Hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa penggunaan RP3 memiliki kemampuan tahan terhadap kelelahan lebih lama dibandingkan dengan RA dan RPMS. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan pengaruh antara recovery aktif dan pasif. Namun recovery pasif terbukti mampu membuktikan bahwa tahan terhadap kelelahan lebih lama dibandingkan dengan recovery aktif.

Effects of active versus passive recovery on muscle endurance

Abstract

The study investigated effects of active and passive toward ability to lift dumbbell to exhausted (endurance ability), so that it can prove effectiveness of recovery for lifting further. Through purposive sampling techniques acquired 23 research subject divided into three groups, passive recovery group accompanied by sphygmomanometer utilization (RPMS), active recovery group (RA), and passive recovery during 3 minutes (RP3) as control group. Research design was use One Pretest and Posttest Design, with single blind study. Research subject lifted dumbbell to exhaustion (endurance), after that, subjects did one of three form of recovery similar with their group, then lifting dumbbell for the second time after recovery until exhausted. This study showed that there is no difference between RA, RPMS and RP3. Specifically, if we looked at comparison between pre- and post- recovery, only RP3 had no experience significance reduction for endurance ability (0,186 > 0,05) compared with RPMS (0,000 < 0,01) dan RA (0,007 < 0,05). This result indicated application of RP3 resistant to fatigue if compared with RA and RPMS. It can conclude that there was no significance effect between active and passive recovery. Whilst, passive recovery has time to exhaustion benefits longer than active recovery.

Keywords

active; passive; recovery; muscle; endurance; otot; daya tahan;

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akagi, R., Imaizumi, N., Sato, S., Hirata, N., Tanimoto, H., & Hirata, K. (2020). Active recovery has a positive and acute effect on recovery from fatigue induced by repeated maximal voluntary contractions of the plantar flexors. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102384

Ben Abderrahman, A., Zouhal, H., Chamari, K., Thevenet, D., De Mullenheim, P. Y., Gastinger, S., … Prioux, J. (2013). Effects of recovery mode (active vs. passive) on performance during a short high-intensity interval training program: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2556-9

Brini, S., Ahmaidi, S., & Bouassida, A. (2019). Effects of passive versus active recovery at different intensities on repeated sprint performance and testosterone/cortisol ratio in male senior basketball players. Science and Sports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2019.07.015

Castagna, C., Abt, G., Manzi, V., Annino, G., Padua, E., & D’Ottavio, S. (2008). Effect of recovery mode on repeated sprint ability in young basketball players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816a4281

Chidnok, W., Dimenna, F. J., Bailey, S. J., Vanhatalo, A., Morton, R. H., Wilkerson, D. P., & Jones, A. M. (2012). Exercise tolerance in intermittent cycling: Application of the critical power concept. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31823ea28a

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 8th Edition (2012). In Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis.

Jougla, A., Micallef, J. P., & Mottet, D. (2010). Effects of active vs. passive recovery on repeated rugby-specific exercises. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2009.04.004

Kenney, W. L., Wilmore, J. H., & Costil, D. L. (2015). Physiology of Sport and Exercise. Sixth Edition. In Human Kinetics.

Lopes, F. A. S., Panissa, V. L. G., Julio, U. F., Menegon, E. M., & Franchini, E. (2014). The effect of active recovery on power performance during the bench press exercise. Journal of Human Kinetics. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2014-0018

Mika, A., Oleksy, Ł., Kielnar, R., Wodka-Natkaniec, E., Twardowska, M., Kamiński, K., & Małek, Z. (2016). Comparison of two different modes of active recovery on muscles performance after fatiguing exercise in mountain canoeist and football players. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164216

Piercy, K. L., Troiano, R. P., Ballard, R. M., Carlson, S. A., Fulton, J. E., Galuska, D. A., … Olson, R. D. (2018). The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14854

Shi, Q., Tong, T. K., Sun, S., Kong, Z., Chan, C. K., Liu, W., & Nie, J. (2018). Influence of recovery duration during 6-s sprint interval exercise on time spent at high rates of oxygen uptake. Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2018.01.001

Shimoyama, Y., & Wada, T. (2015). Influence of active and passive recovery on physiological responses during rest period in interval swimming. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2015.12.160

Van Hooren, B., & Peake, J. M. (2018). Do We Need a Cool-Down After Exercise? A Narrative Review of the Psychophysiological Effects and the Effects on Performance, Injuries and the Long-Term Adaptive Response. Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0916-2

Vargas, N., Robergs, R., McNaughton, L., Siegler, J., Altobelli, S., Hillman, A., & Fransen, J. (2011). Effects of active and passive recovery on intense intermittent forearm exercise. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.11.233

Wahl, P., Mathes, S., Köhler, K., Achtzehn, S., Bloch, W., & Mester, J. (2013). Effects of active vs. passive recovery during Wingate-based training on the acute hormonal, metabolic and psychological response. Growth Hormone and IGF Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghir.2013.07.004

Yachsie. (2019). Pengaruh Latihan Dumbell-Thera Band Terhadap Daya Tahan Otot Lengan Dan Akurasi Memanah Pada Atlet Panahan. MEDIKORA, Vol. 18 No. 2.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/medikora.v19i1.30886