The effect of semantic reversibility of agent-target of transitive utterances on utterance structure in Bisindo Yogyakarta

Linda Yusfita Dewi, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Harwintha Y. Anjarningsih, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

Abstract


The flexibility of utterance structure can be influenced by semantic factors. At this level, structures can vary in terms of the positions of the constituents, namely subject, predicate, or object. To see how far semantics plays a role in the flexibility of structures, this research aims to investigate how the semantic reversibility of agent-target influences the structure of the resulting BISINDO Yogyakarta signs. The data source for this research was video-recorded signs that had been transcribed into utterances. The data collection instrument used was a collection of pictures that was used to stimulate deaf individuals to produce signed utterances. The results showed that there were differences in the resulting structure. (1) Non-reversible utterance structures tended to produce single-clauses with various patterns dominated by SPO and SOP structures. This diversity was predominantly influenced by the classification of targets, appropriate hand movements, and the omission of the agents. Meanwhile, reversible stimuli tended to produce two structures, namely single-clauses dominated by SPO and multi-clauses dominated by SPO P. The multi-clause structure was the structure that dominated reversible utterances. The complexity of the structure of this reversible content was characterized by an agent-target indexical description, and the involvement of actions/expressions of action targets. This proved the notion that the indexical description found in almost all multi-clause structures was the preference of deaf individuals in avoiding potential ambiguity between agent-target. Just like spoken languages universally, sign languages such as BISINDO in the Yogyakarta region and BISINDO in the Jakarta region also shared linguistic features.


Keywords


reversibility, sentence structure, agent, target, BISINDO

References


Cormier, K. (2007). Do All Pronouns Point? Indexicality of First Personal Plural Pronouns in BSL and ASL. In Visible Variation:Comparative Studies on Sign Language Structure (Pamela M., pp. 63–102). De Gruyter, Inc. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/indonesiau-ebooks/detail.action?docID=364735.

Cormier, K., Schembri, A., & Woll, B. (2013). Pronouns and Pointing in Sign Languages. Lingua, 137, 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.010

Emmorey, K. (2003). Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/indonesiau-ebooks/detail.action?docID=335531

Ergin, R., Meir, I., Ilkbasaran, D., Padden, C., & Jackendoff, R. (2018). The Development of Argument Structure in Central Taurus Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 18(4), 612–639. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2018.0018

Felix, S. (2021). Effects of the Semantic and Morphological Factors on Word Order in Simple Transitive Clauses in Three Asian Sign Languages. Senri Ethnological Studies, 107, 5–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.15021/00009867

Fenlon, J., Cormier, K., & Brentari, D. (2019). The Phonology of Sign Language. In Sign Language Phonology (Issue December, pp. 1–344). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316286401

Fischer, S. D. (1975). Influences on Word Order Change in American Sign Language. In Word Order and Word Order Change (Charles Li, pp. 1–25). University of Texas Press.

Fischer, S. D. (2014). Constituent Order in Sign Languages. Gengo Kenkyu, 146, 1–18. https://www.ls-japan.org/modules/documents/LSJpapers/journals/146_fischer.pdf

Fischer, S. D. (2017). Crosslinguistic Variation in Sign Language Syntax. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-034150

Fischer, S. D., & Hulst, H. Van Der. (2003). Sign Language Structures. In Deaf Studies , Language , and Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199750986.013.0024

Handhika, T., Zen, R. I. M., Murni, Lestari, D. P., & Sari, I. (2018). Gesture recognition for Indonesian Sign Language (BISINDO). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012173

Indra, D., Purnawansyah, Madenda, S., & Wibowo, E. P. (2019). Indonesian sign language recognition based on shape of hand gesture. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.101

Jantunen, T. (2008). Fixed and Free: The Order of the Verbal Predicate and Its Core Arguments in Declarative Transitive Clause in Finnish Sign Language. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 21, 83–123. http://www.linguistics.fi/julkaisut/SKY2008/Jantunen_NETTIVERSIO.pdf

Kimmelman, V. (2012). Word Order in Russian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 12, 414–445. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2012.0001

Kridalaksana, H. (2002). Struktur, Kategori, dan Fungsi dalam Teori Sintaksis. Atma Jaya.

Liddell, S. K. (1980). American Sign Language Syntax. Mouton Publisher, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112418260

Lintangsari, A. P., Widodo, W., & Kuswoyo, R. A. (2019). Keterampilan Narasi Siswa Tuli Pada Tingkat Mikro. Linguistik Indonesia, 37(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v37i2.107

Massone, M. I., & Curiel, M. (2004). Sign Order in Argentine Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 5, 63–93. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26190759

Mouton, D. G. (2012). Sign Language: An International Handbook (R. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (eds.)). Hubert & Co. http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/JKM/article/view/2203

Napoli, D. J., Spence, R. S., & de Quadros, R. M. (2017). Influence of Predicate Sense on Word Order in Sign Languages: Intensional and Extensional Verbs. Language, 93(3), 641–670. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0039

Novietri, & Kushartanti, B. (2018). The Use of Cohesive Device in Deaf and Hearing Children’s Writing. Cultural Dynamics in a Globalized World, 811–817. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315225340

Palfreyman, N. (2016). Riset Linguistik dengan Metode Partisipatoris tentang Negasi Gramatikal dalam Bahasa Isyarat Indonesia (BISINDO). Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya 14, 21(1), 1–9. http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/JKM/article/view/2203

Perniss, P. M., Pfau, R., & Steinbach, M. (2007). Can’t You See The Difference? Source of Variation in Sign Language Structure. In Visible Variation:Comparative Studies on Sign Language Structure (Perniss, P, pp. 1–34). De Gruyter, Inc. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/indonesiau-ebooks/detail.action?docID=364735.

Pfau, R., & Steinbach, M. (2015). Person Climbing Up a Tree (And Other Adventuresin Sign Languages Grammaticalization). In Signs and Structure: Formal Approaches to Sign Language Syntax (Rutkowski, pp. 71–102). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/indonesiau-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4386606

Pichler, D. C. (2011). Using Early ASL Word Order to Shed Light on Word Order Variability in Sign Language. In Variation in the Input, Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics (M. Anderss). Gallaudent University. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9207-6

Pujiati, D. (2019). Perbandingan Struktur Antara Sistem Isyarat Bahasa Indonesia (SIBI) dengan Bahasa Isyarat Indonesia (BISINDO): Kajian Sintaksis [Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/41281

Putri, I. S. S., & Yuwono, U. (2024). Superstructure and Cohesion in the Narratives of Jakarta Sign Language Signers. In B. Kushartanti & D. N. Djenar (Eds.), Language Practices Among Children and Youth in Indonesia (pp. 69–90). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4775-1

Rahyono, F. X. (2018). Pengembangan Fungsi Ragam Bahasa Isyarat Alamiah, BISINDO, Sebagai Sarana Pencerdasan Orang Tuli. Kongres Bahasa Indonesia, 1–13. https://kbi.kemdikbud.go.id/kbi_back/file/foto_media/media_detail_1542337292.pdf

Schlenker, P., Bonnet, M., Lamberton, J., Lamberton, J., Chemla, E., Santoro, M., & Geraci, C. (2024). Iconic Syntax: Sign Language Classifier Predicates and Gesture Sequences. In Linguistics and Philosophy (Vol. 47, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-023-09388-z

Schouwstra, M., & De Swart, H. (2014). The Semantic Origins of Word Order. Cognition, 131(3), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.004

Stokoe, W. C. (2001a). Sign Language versus Spoken Language. Sign Language Studies, 1(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2001.0017

Stokoe, W. C. (2001b). The Study and Use of Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 1(4), 369–406. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2001.0016

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk penelitian yang bersifat eksploratif, enterpretatif, interaktif dan konstruktif. Alfabeta.

Vizzi, F., Angelelli, P., Iaia, M., Risser, A. H., & Marinelli, C. V. (2022). Writing Composition Ability and Spelling Competence in Deaf Subjects: a Psycholinguistic Analysis of Source of Difficulties. Reading & Writting. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10335-w

Wedayanti, N. P. L. (2019). Teman Tuli Diantara SIBI Dan BISINDO. Senarilip, 3, 137–146. https://ojs.pnb.ac.id/index.php/Proceedings/article/view/1513

Tim Produksi Bahasa Isyarat Yogyakarta. (2016). Bahasa Isyarat Yogyakarta (1st ed.). FIB UI.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v23i2.71532

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




______________________

 

                                 

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

RJI Main logo

 

      

The International Journal of Linguistic, Literature, and Its Teaching at http://http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/litera/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

 

Flag Counter