Pengembangan DSS untuk menentukan metode pelatihan e-learning berbasis moodle bagi guru SMK

Muslikhin Muslikhin, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Eko Marpanaji, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan menghasilkan desain DSS dan mengetahui kualitas DSS yang dipakai instruktur dalam menentukan metode pelatihan e-learning berbasis Moodle bagi guru SMK.Penelitian dan pengembangan ini melalui lima fase yaitu: asesmen/analisis, desain, pengembangan, implementasi dan evaluasi. Subyek penelitian adalah guru SMK di Kota Yogyakarta, Sleman dan Magelang 75 responden need assessment and analysis, 15 guru uji beta, 24 guru untuk evaluasi. Instrumen pengumpulan data berupa lembar kuesioner need assessment and analysis, lembar validasi ahli pelatihan, lembar uji alfa, lembar uji beta dan lembar evaluasi pelatihan.HasilpenelitianmenunjukkanDSS memberikan alternatif keputusan secara cepat melalui empat pertimbangan berdasarkan peserta, tujuan, keuntungan, dan level. Hasil uji alfa dan beta DSS menunjukkanskor 4,14dan 4,02 atau kategori “baik”.SedangkanakurasiDSS melalui evaluasi terhadap 24 pesertapelatihane-learningmenunjukkan 88,14%akurat.

 

DEVELOPING A DSSFOR DETERMINING THE METHOD OF MOODLE-BASEDE-LEARNINGTRAINING FOR VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS

Abstract

This study aims to produce the DSS design and knowing the quality of the DSS is used in determining instructor training method based on Moodle e-learning for Vocational High School teachers. This study was a research and development conducted in five steps, i.e. need assessment/analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation. The subject was teachers of SMK at Yogyakarta City, Sleman and Magelang, there were 75 respondents for needs assessment and analysis 15 teachers for beta testing, 24 teachers for evaluation. The instruments of the data collection were validation sheets for the needs assessment and analysis, alpha test sheets, beta test sheets and training evaluation sheets.The result of the study shows the following: the DSSprovides an alternativerapiddecisionsthroughfourconsiderationsbased on: participants, objectives, benefits, andlevel.The Alpha test and Beta test results show a mean score of 3.92 and 4.02 or the DSS is in the “good” category. While, the accuracy of the DSS through an evaluation of 24 participants of the e-learning training shows 88,14% accuracy.


Keywords


DSS; pengambilan keputusan; menentukan metode; pelatihan e-learning; decision making; determine methods; e-learning training

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adwan, A. A. (2012).Implementing e-learning in the Jordanian higher education system: Factors affecting impact. [Versi elektronik]. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 2012, Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 121-135.

Ardian. (2012). Model Decission Support System untuk Pengembangan Program Studi di Perguruan Tinggi. Diakses tanggal 30 Oktober 2012, dari http://pps.uny.ac.id/berita/model-decision-support-system-untuk-pengembangan- program-studi-di-perguruan-tinggi.htmls.uny.ac.id.

Assotition South East Asia Nations. (2009). Roadmap for an ASEAN community 2009-2015. Jakarta: ASEAN Secreta- riat.

del Mar, C. M. (2006, July). Teacher training in ICT-based LEARNING settings: design and implementation of an online instructional model for english language teachers (Desertasi doctor Pheo- nixUniversity) pp. 4-88.

Frize, M.& Frasson, C. (August 2000). Workshop: Cognitive and social sciences foundations for medical education and training in the information technology clinical and investigative medicine; 23, 4; ProQuest Science Journals pg. 266.

Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J.K. (2003). Training in organization: need assessment, development and evaluation. 4thed. Wadsworth Group.

Jardiknas. (2012). Integrasi TIK. Diambil pada tanggal 10 Agustus 2012, dari http://jardiknas.kemdiknas.go.id/

Kemendiknas. (2009). Permendiknas No. 78 Tahun 2009 tentang Kebijakan RSBI dan RSBI.

Kubr, M. & Prokopenko, J. (1989). Diagnosing management training and development needs: Concepts and techniques. Geneva: International Labor Office.

Kusrini. (2007). Konsep dan aplikasi sistem pendukung keputusan. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Lee, W. & Owens, D. L. (2004). Multimedia based instructional design: Computer based training web based training distance broadcast training, performance based solutions 2nd ed. San Fransisco: Pfeiffer.

Lynton, R., P. & Pareek, U. (1992). Pelatihan dan pengembangan tenaga kerja. (Terjemahan Redaksi Pustaka Binaman Pressindo). Jakarta: Karya Unipress. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 1968).

MOODLE. (2012). About MOODLE LMS. Diakses pada tanggal 1 Agustus 2012, dari http://moodle.org/about/

Naidu, S. (2006). A guidebook of principles, procedures and practices. Cemca, New Delhi.

Naser, A., et.al (2011). A prototype decision support system for optimizing the effectiveness of elearning in educational institutions. International Journal of Data Mining & Knowledge Management Process (IJDKP) Vol.1, No.4, July 2011.

Pressman, R. S. (2010). Software engineering: A practitioner’s approach, 7th ed. New York : Mc Graw Hill.

Rosen, L. D. (1993). Treating technophobia: A longitudinal evaluation of the computerphobia reduction program. Journal of Computer in Human Behavior, 9, 27-50.

Sukardjo. (2005). Desain pembelajaran: Evaluasi pembelajaran. Handout perkuliahan: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Turban, E., Jay, E.A, & Peng, L.J. (2005). Decision support system and intelligent system. (Terjemahan Dwi Prabantini). Yogyakarta: Andi Offset (buku asli diterbitkan tahun 1992).

Wedel, K. & Brown, F. G. (1974). Assesing training needs. Washington: National Training and Developmnet Service Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v3i2.1602

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Our journal indexed by:
       

ISSN 2088-2866 (print) || ISSN 2476-9401 (online)

View Journal Visitor Stats