Urgensi evaluasi kualitas pembelajaran penjas di Era 4.0: studi evaluasi antara teori dan praktis
Abstract
Abstrak: Evaluasi merupakan proses identifikasi sebagai dasar pengambilan keputusan suatu program yang dilaksanakan agar sesuai dengan tujuan yang akan dicapai. Akan tetapi, fakta yang berbeda ditunjukkan dalam fenomena dalam pembelajaran pendidikan jasmani yang belum dilaksanakan secara maksimal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Implementasi evaluasi dalam peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran penjas yang dikaji melalui perbandingan antara teori dan realitas dengan menggunakan pendekatan CIPP. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa metode campuran (kuantitatif dan kualitatif). Sampel data yang digunakan adalah mahasiswa Pendidikan Jasmani, Kesehatan dan Rekreasi dengan jumlah 102 mahasiswa yang minimal telah menempuh empat semester di Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan UNY. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa nilai tertinggi Context 64,70% interpretasi sangat setuju akan adanya evaluasi sebagai peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran dengan dasar perencanaan, nilai tertinggi Input 62,74% interpretasi sangat setuju akan adanya evaluasi sebagai peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran dengan dasar kesiapan program, nilai tertinggi process interpretasi sangat setuju 51,96% akan adanya evaluasi sebagai peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran dengan dasar proses pelaksanaan pembelajaran, dan nilai tertinggi product 75,49 interpretasi setuju akan adanya evaluasi sebagai peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran dengan dasar hasil evaluasi bisa digunakan sebagai tolak ukur perbaikan mutu pembelajaran.
Abstract: Evaluation is an identification process as the basis for making decisions about a program that is implemented in accordance with the objectives to be achieved. However, different facts are shown in the phenomena in physical education learning that have not been implemented optimally. This study aims to determine the implementation of evaluation in improving the quality of physical education learning which is studied through a comparison between theory and reality using the CIPP approach. The method used in this study is a mixed method (quantitative and qualitative). The data sample used is Physical Education, Health and Recreation students with a total of 102 students who have taken at least four semesters at the Faculty of Sports Science, UNY. The results of this study indicate that the highest value of context is 64.70%, the interpretation strongly agrees with the evaluation as an improvement in the quality of learning on the basis of planning, the highest value Input is 62.74%, the interpretation strongly agrees with the evaluation as an improvement in the quality of learning on the basis of program readiness. the highest process interpretation strongly agrees 51.96% of the evaluation as an improvement in the quality of learning on the basis of the learning implementation process, and the highest value of the product 75.49 interpretations agrees that the evaluation as an improvement in the quality of learning on the basis of the evaluation results can be used as a benchmark for improving the quality of learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Boyle & Phelps. (2010). The International Journal of Learning. Pathways to teaching: a curriculum innovation enhancing recognition of students’ career aspirations and expectations: redesigning curriculum to acknowledge diversity. Volume 17, Number 2.
Creswell, J, W. (2010). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Darmawan dan Deni. (2011). Teknologi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Dave G & Mark S .(2016). Evaluation Theory and Practice: Comparing Program Evaluation and Evaluation in Planning: Journal of Planning Education and Research.
Depdiknas .(2003). Undang-undang RI No.20 tahun 2003.tentang system pendidikan nasional: Jakarta.
Hanski, M. (2016, July 14). Gym classes go digital: How tech changes physical education. Retrieved January 20, 2020, from https://blog.capterra.com/gym-classes-go-digital-how- tech-changes-physical-education/.
Hong W, Fei Y & Xingyang X. (2022). Evaluation Method of Physical Education Teaching and Training Quality Based on Deep Learning. Hindawi: Volume 2022, Article ID 1680888.
Jonassen, David, Pfeiffer, William & Wilson, Brent. (1998). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Juniu dan Miri Shonfeld. (2013). Technology Integration in Physical Education teacher Education Programs: A Comparative Analysis. Costarica: Revista. Volume 13, No. 3.
Koehler, Matthew & Mishra, Punya. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee On Innovation And Technology (Ed.), The Handbook Of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) For Educators (halaman. 3-29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kopnina, H .(2020). Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals: The Journal of Environmental Education.
LaMaster, Kathryn. (1998). Technology: Attitudes, efficacy, and use by practicing physical education teachers. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69(6), 21-24.
Moleong, L, J. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT.remaja Rosdakarya.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). Curriculum and Instruction: A 21st Century Skills Implementation Guide. 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 305: Tucson, AZ 85701.
Pramodini D & Anu Sophia .(2022). Evaluation Of Importance For Research In Education: Ijssir, Vol. 11, No. 01, January 2022.
Satja S. & Alexander N. (2019). The CIPP Model: Applications in Language Program Evaluation. The Journal of Asia TEFL:Vol. 16, No. 4, Winter 2019, 1360-1367.
Shonfeld, Miri, Goldshtein, Olzan & Forkush-Baruch, Alona. (2008). Information Technology In Teacher Education In Israel. Maital (IUCELL), Haifa.
Shonfeld, Miri, Resta, Pual & Yaniv, Hanan. (2011). Engagement and Social Presence in a Virtual Worlds (Second Life) Learning Environment. Dalam Matthew Koehler & Punya. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 740-745).
Sofyan dan Abdul Rachman. (2013). Penerapan Teknologi Pembelajaran Audio Visual Terhadap Hasil Belajar Dribbling Sepak Bola Di Sma Negeri 1 Bondowoso (Studi Pada Siswa Kelas Xii Di Sman 1 Bondowoso). Surabaya:Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga dan Kesehatan Volume 01 Nomor 02 Tahun 2013, 440 - 444.
Stufflebeam, D, L. & Shinkfield, A, J. (2009). Evaluation theory, models, and applications, san francisco: A Wiley Imprint. Journal of Multi Disciplinary Evaluation. Volume 6, Number 11. ISSN 1556-8180.
Suherman Adang dan Mahendra Agus. (2021). Menuju Perkembangan Menyeluruh, Menyiasati Kurikulum Pendidikan Jasmani di Sekolah Menengah Umum. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Wiguna Satria. (2021). Aplikasi Anates Dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jawa Tengah: CV. Pena Persada.
Winarno. (2014). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga dan Kesehatan. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Woods, Marianne, Goc Karp Grace, Miao, Hui & Perlman, Dana. (2008). Physical Educators' Technology Competencies And Usage. Physical Educator: a magazine for the profession 65(2), 82-99.
Wyant, J., & Baek, J.-H. (2018). Re-thinking technology adoption in physical education. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25742981.2018.1514983.
Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C & Katherine, M. (2011). Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement. Volume 15, Number 4, 57-84. ISSN 1534-6104.
Chan, W. K.; Leung, K. I.; Hoc, C.; Wuc, W.; Lam, K. Y.; Wong, N. L.; Chan, C. Y. R.; Leung, K. M.; Tse, A. C. Y. (2021) Effectiveness of online teaching in physical education during covid-19 school closures: A survey study of frontline physical education teachers in Hong Kong. Journal of Physical Education and Sport; 21(4):1622-1628.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpji.v18i2.52910
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpji.