EFFECTS OF POINT-PIN REWARD METHOD TOWARDS STUDENTS’ INTEREST AND ACQUISITION

Nanik - Setyaningsih; Djukri Djukri

doi:10.21831/jk.v4i2.31146

EFFECTS OF POINT-PIN REWARD METHOD TOWARDS STUDENTS’ INTEREST AND ACQUISITION

Nanik - Setyaningsih, Graduate from Yogyakarta State University, Biology Education Department, Indonesia
Djukri Djukri, Yogyakarta State University

10.21831/jk.v4i2.31146

Abstract

This study was aimed at determining the effect of the point-pin reward method in Biology cross-specialization learning activities towards students’ interest and acquisition in the 11th-grade social science class in State Senior High School 1 Sentolo. The research was a quasi-experimental study using a pre-test and post test non-equivalent control group design. The number of participants consisted of 41 students divided into 2 classes, the control class and the experimental class. Data for students’ interest in learning were collected using interest questionnaires analyzed using a Likert scale. Data for students’ acquisition were obtained by analyzing written tests. Research data were analyzed using independent-samples t test. The results of this study indicate that: The point-pin reward method has significant effects on the students’ interest and acquisition in the learning activities of biology cross-specialization lessons.

Keywords

point-pin reward method, learners’ interest, learners’ acquisition

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arifin, Z. (2013). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. (1990). Manajemen pengajaran secara manusiawi. Jakarta. PT. Rineka Cipta. Armstrong, M., & Brown, D. (2006). Strategic reward making it happen. London: The British Library.

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.), Englehart, M. D., Walker, H., Furst, E. J., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). The taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals, handbook I: Cognitive domain. (Terj.: Agung Prihantoro). Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Chahal, G. (2008). The dream, how i learned the risks and rewards of entrepreneurship and made millions. New York: St. Martin’s Press LLC.

Cress, C. M., Collier, P. J., & Reitenauer, V. L. (2013). Learning through serving: A student guidebook for service-learning and civic engagement across academic disciplines and cultural communities (2nd ed.). Virginia: Stylus Publishing.

Danim, S., & Khairil, H. (2014). Psikologi pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Delves, D. P. (2004). Stock options and the new rules of corportate accountability, measuring, managing and rewarding executive performance. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (1990). Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Downing, J. P. (1997). Creative teaching: Ideas to boost student interest.United States: ABC-CLIO.

Freedberg, M., Schacherer, J., & Hazeltine, E. (2016). Incidental learning of rewarded associations bolsters learning on an associative task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(5), 786.

Hamalik, O. (2015). Proses belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Hamid, R. (2006). Reward dan punishment dalam perspektif pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Kopertis Wilayah XI Kalimantan, 4(5).

Hefer, C., & Dreisbach, G. (2017). How performance-contingent reward prospect modulates cognitive control: Increased cue maintenance at the cost of decreased flexibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(10), 1643-1658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000397.

Kececi, G. (2017).The aims and learning attainments of secondary and high school students attending science festivals: A case study. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(23), 1146 -1153. DOI: 10.5897/ ERR2017.3378.

Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 586-614.

Laine, E., Veermans, M., Lahti, A., & Veermans, K. (2017). Generation of Student Interest in an Inquiry-Based Mobile Learning Environment. Frontline Learning Research, 5(4), 42-60.

Lee, J., Puig, A., & Lee, S. M. (2012). The effect of the demand control and effort reward imbalance models on the academic burnout of Korean adolescents. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32(1), 113-123.

Li, Y. (2011). On the cultivation of students’ interests in biology teaching. International Education Studies, 4(2), 141-143.

Marno, & Idris, M. (2010). Strategi & metode pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Ar- ruzz Media.

Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudyaan. (2016). Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

National Research Council. (2003). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington D. C.: The National Academies Press.

Nessel, D. D., & Graham, M. (2007). Thinking strategies for student achievement. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Pratiwi, D. A., Maryati, S., Srikini, S., & Bambang, S. (2006). Biologi untuk SMA kelas XI. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Purwanto, N. (2011). Ilmu pendidikan teoritis dan praktis. Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Rondonuwu, I. P, Kaunang, E. S. N., & Rogahang, F. H. N. (2015). Pemberian reward dan punishment dalam meningkatkan keterampilan metakognitif peserta didik di SMA Negeri 1 Tompaso. JSME MIPA UNIMA, 3(2).

Sani, R. A. (2016). Penilaian autentik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Santrock, J. W. (2011). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Humanika.

Savickas, M. L., & Spokane, A. R. (Eds.). (1999). Vocational in-terests: Meaning, measurement, and counseling use. California: Davies-Black Publishing.

Sears, D. A., & Pai, H. H. (2012). Effects of cooperative versus individual study on learning and motivation after reward-removal. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 246-262.

Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya (Cet. 5). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Trianto. (2011). Model-model pembelajaran inovatif berorientasi konstruktivistik (Cetakan kelima). Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.

Volet, S., & Jarvela, S. (2001). Motivation in learning contexts theoretical advances and methodological implications. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.

Watkins, C., Carnel, E., & Lodge, C. (2010). Effective learning in classroom. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Widhiarso, W. (2011) Mengaplikasikan uji-t untuk membandingkan gain score antar kelompok dalam eksperimen. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi UGM.

Woodrow Jr., G. (2015) The pyramid approach a framework for raising student academic achievement. London: The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.

Yoon, H. J., Sung, S. Y., Choi, J. N., Lee, K., & Kim, S. (2015). Tangible and intangible rewards and employee creativity: The mediating role of situational extrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 383-393. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2015.1088283.

Zain, A. N. M. (2017). The effect of instructional congruence on students interest towards learning science. European Journal of Physics Education, 1(1), 20-27.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v4i2.31146