Revolutionizing Ethnographic Collection Introduction through Augmented Reality Technology in Museum

Alfrina Mewengkang, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia
Herry Sumual, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia
Ilyas Teruna, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia

Abstract


The North Sulawesi Provincial State Museum is one of the tourist destinations that offers a profound experience in exploring the historical, cultural, and tourism heritage of Indonesia. Visitors can learn about various valuable historical collections, including ethnographic collections, which hold significant historical value. However, the information provided about the ethnographic collection is very limited, making it challenging for visitors to understand and appreciate it. This research aims to develop an application for recognizing the museum's ethnographic collection using Augmented Reality (AR) technology, which will make it easier for visitors to obtain information about the collection. This application was designed and developed using the Multimedia Development Life Cycle (MDLC) method, which consists of six stages: conceptualization, design, material gathering, assembly, testing, and distribution. The result of this research is an Android-based AR Museum application that can display information about the ethnographic collection in the form of text, sound, and 3D images. This application can enhance the visitor experience, especially in understanding and appreciating the cultural heritage and traditions represented in the ethnographic collection of the North Sulawesi Provincial State Museum. Additionally, this application can improve the accessibility of information about the ethnographic collection and promote the museum as a center for heritage preservation, education, and culture.


Keywords


Augmented reality; ethnographic collection; museum

Full Text:

PDF

References


K. Hetherington, “Museum,” Theory, Cult. Soc., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 597–603, 2006, doi: 10.1177/0263276406023002107.

V. Ginsburgh and F. Mairesse, “Defining a museum: Suggestions for an alternative approach,” Museum Manag. Curatorsh., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 15–33, 1997, doi: 10.1080/09647779700301601.

D. Folga-Januszewska, “History of the museum concept and contemporary challenges: Introduction into the debate on the new ICOM museum definition,” Muzealnictwo, vol. 61, no. 61, pp. 27–45, 2020, doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.1129.

A. E. Pelealu and D. E. Winoto, Museum as a History Learning Information Center. Atlantis Press SARL, 2023. doi: 10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0_208.

A. F. Eardley, H. Thompson, A. Fineman, R. Hutchinson, L. Bywood, and M. Cock, “Devisualizing the Museum: From Access to Inclusion,” J. Museum Educ., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 150–165, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10598650.2022.2077067.

T. Feisrami and E. N. Y. B, The Implementation of Industry 4 . 0. Atlantis Press International BV, 2023. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-076-3.

H. Garcia Carrizosa, K. Sheehy, J. Rix, J. Seale, and S. Hayhoe, “Designing technologies for museums: accessibility and participation issues,” J. Enabling Technol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 31–39, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/JET-08-2019-0038.

V. Kamariotou, M. Kamariotou, and F. Kitsios, “Strategic planning for virtual exhibitions and visitors’ experience: A multidisciplinary approach for museums in the digital age,” Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit., vol. 21, p. e00183, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2021.e00183.

E. Zidianakis et al., “The Invisible Museum: A User-Centric Platform for Creating Virtual 3D Exhibitions with VR Support,” Electronics, vol. 10, no. 3. 2021. doi: 10.3390/electronics10030363.

D. C. Villagran-Vizcarra, D. Luviano-Cruz, L. A. Pérez-Domínguez, L. C. Méndez-González, and F. Garcia-Luna, “Applications Analyses, Challenges and Development of Augmented Reality in Education, Industry, Marketing, Medicine, and Entertainment,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13052766.

C. A. Chen and H. I. Lai, “Application of augmented reality in museums – Factors influencing the learning motivation and effectiveness,” Sci. Prog., vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 1–16, 2021, doi: 10.1177/00368504211059045.

E. Spadoni, S. Porro, M. Bordegoni, I. Arosio, L. Barbalini, and M. Carulli, “Augmented Reality to Engage Visitors of Science Museums through Interactive Experiences,” Heritage, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1370–1394, 2022, doi: 10.3390/heritage5030071.

A. Ihsan, N. Fadillah, and C. R. Gunawan, “Acehnese traditional clothing recognition based on augmented reality using hybrid tracking method,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1030–1036, 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v20.i2.pp1030-1036.

A. Fattah, A. A. Gunawan, R. B. Taufik, and H. Pranoto, “Effect of the implementation attractive augmented reality for museums visit,” ICIC Express Lett. Part B Appl., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 541–548, 2021, doi: 10.24507/icicelb.12.06.541.

S. Puspasari, N. Suhandi, and J. N. Iman, “Augmented Reality Development for Supporting Cultural Education Role in SMB II Museum during Covid-19 Pandemic,” 2020 5th Int. Conf. Informatics Comput. ICIC 2020, pp. 1–6, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICIC50835.2020.9288619.

S. M. C. Loureiro, “The Use of Augmented Reality to Expand the Experience of Museum Visitors BT - Augmented Reality in Tourism, Museums and Heritage: A New Technology to Inform and Entertain,” V. Geroimenko, Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 141–151. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-70198-7_8.

J. Morgan and S. Macdonald, “De-growing museum collections for new heritage futures,” Int. J. Herit. Stud., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 56–70, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/13527258.2018.1530289.

R. Roedavan, B. Pudjoatmodjo, and A. Putri Sujana, “Multimedia Development Life Cycle (Mdlc),” ResearchGate, no. February, pp. 1–6, 2022, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16273.92006.

Ike Yuliarni, Jefri Marzal, and Eko Kuntarto, “Analysis of Multimedia Learning Mathematics Storyboard Design,” Int. J. Trends Math. Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 149–152, 2019.

M. Wilson, S. Bathia, L. Morell, P. Gochyyev, B. W. Koo, and R. Smith, “Seeking a better balance between efficiency and interpretability: Comparing the likert response format with the Guttman response format.,” Psychological Methods, vol. 28, no. 6. American Psychological Association, Wilson, Mark: Graduate School of Education, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley Way West Building, #1670, Berkeley, CA, US, 94720, MarkW@berkeley.edu, pp. 1358–1373, 2023. doi: 10.1037/met0000462.

Sugiyono, “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendalaman Kualitatif, dan R & D,” CV. Alf., 2013.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v9i1.66191

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Our Journal indexed by:

ISSN 2477-2399 (online) || ISSN 2580-6424 (print)

View My Stats

Flag Counter