Computational Thinking Skills Theorization in The Vocational High School Computer Programming Subject Context

Admaja Dwi Herlambang, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Aditya Rachmadi, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

Abstract


The purpose of the study is to compile concepts related to computational thinking skills in the context of computer programming subject. The research design used is data theorization (grounded theory) with open coding and axial coding data analysis techniques. Three types of data collection protocols are used: interview protocols, observation protocols, and recording protocols. The characteristics informants used are students who have experience learning computer programming in the vocational high school. The research produced several concepts, namely the problem concept, which then gave rise to the computational thinking skills concept. The problem concept consists of three sub-concepts: the common problem sub-concept, the medium problem sub-concept, and the high problem sub-concept. The concept of computational thinking skills is a set of skills required in the problem-solving process in computer programming. Computational thinking is not just a thought process but an expression of skills that others can observe. In the computer programming subject context, two concepts influence the process of mastering computational thinking skills: the guidance strategies concept and the information sources concept. The concept of success becomes a mediator in developing computational thinking skills. The theory produced in this study can be used as a basis for conducting research with quantitative designs related to deductive proof of the theory.


Keywords


Computational thinking skills; computer programming subject; vocational high school; data theorization; grounded theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


V. J. Shute, C. Sun, and J. Asbell-Clarke, “Demystifying computational thinking,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 22, pp. 142–158, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003.

M. Wang and Y. F. Wang, “A Study on Computer Teaching Based on Computational Thinking,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 11, no. 12, p. 72, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v11i12.6069.

M. Mohaghegh and M. Mccauley, “Computational Thinking: The Skill Set of the 21st Century,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1524–1530, 2016.

M. S. Khine, “Strategies for Developing Computational Thinking,” in Computational Thinking in the STEM Disciplines, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 3–9. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-93566-9_1.

N. G. Lederman and J. Lederman, “Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry,” in Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2020, pp. 3–20. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-57646-2_1.

J. M. Spector, “Education, Training, Competencies, Curricula and Technology,” in Emerging Technologies for STEAM Education, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 3–14. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5_1.

O. Mack and A. Khare, “Perspectives on a VUCA World,” in Managing in a VUCA World, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 3–19. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16889-0_1.

L. McIntyre, Post-Truth. London: The MIT Press, 2018.

R. Hémez, “Global Data Shock: Strategic Ambiguity, Deception, and Surprise in an Age of Information Overload, Robert Mandel, Palo Alto (CA), Stanford University Press, 2019, 272 pages,” Polit. étrangère, vol. Hiver, no. 4, pp. XII–XII, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.3917/pe.194.0183l.

P. Ferragina and F. Luccio, Computational Thinking: First Algorithms, Then Code. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-97940-3.

P. J. Denning and M. Tedre, Computational Thinking. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2019.

P. Hubwieser, “Analysis of Learning Objectives in Object Oriented Programming,” in Informatics Education –Supporting ComputationalThinking, Roland T. Mittermeir and M. M. Sysło, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, pp. 142–150.

F. Buitrago Flórez, R. Casallas, M. Hernández, A. Reyes, S. Restrepo, and G. Danies, “Changing a Generation’s Way of Thinking: Teaching Computational Thinking Through Programming,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 834–860, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.3102/0034654317710096.

F. Kalelioğlu, “Characteristics of Studies Conducted on Computational Thinking: A Content Analysis,” in Computational Thinking in the STEM Disciplines, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 11–29. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-93566-9_2.

C. Tikva and E. Tambouris, “A systematic mapping study on teaching and learning Computational Thinking through programming in higher education,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 41, p. 100849, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100849.

G. Fessakis, V. Komis, E. Mavroudi, and S. Prantsoudi, “Exploring the Scope and the Conceptualization of Computational Thinking at the K-12 Classroom Level Curriculum,” in Computational Thinking in the STEM Disciplines, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 181–212. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-93566-9_10.

A. Deguchi, Y. Akashi, E. Hato, J. Ohkata, T. Nakano, and S. Warisawa, “Solving Social Issues Through Industry–Academia Collaboration,” in Society 5.0, Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020, pp. 85–115. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2989-4_5.

B. Salgues, Society 5.0: Industry of the future, technologies, methods and tools. USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2018. doi: 10.1002/9781119507314.

N. M. Seel, Ed., Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, vol. 50, no. 03. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6.

UNESCO, Education for Sustainable Development Goals: learning objectives. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2017. doi: 10.54675/CGBA9153.

RI, Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 57 Tahun 2021 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Indonesia, 2021, p. 49.

J. W. Collins and N. P. O’Brien, Eds., The Greenwood Dictionary of Education. London: Greenwood Press, 2003. doi: 10.5860/CHOICE.49-1829.

A. D. Herlambang, A. Rachmadi, and S. H. Wijoyo, “Git and GitHub Application Training Program to Support Vocational High School Students in Collaborative Computer Programming Learning,” JPPM (Jurnal Pendidik. dan Pemberdaya. Masyarakat), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 13–24, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.21831/jppm.v10i1.58550.

K. Illeris, “A comprehensive understanding of human learning,” in Contemporary Theories of Learning, London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 7–20. doi: 10.4324/9780203463321-6.

E. Wenger, “A social theory of learning,” in Contemporary Theories of Learning, New York: Routdledge, 2018, pp. 219–228. doi: 10.4324/9781315147277-16.

F. Luo, M. Israel, and B. Gane, “Elementary Computational Thinking Instruction and Assessment: A Learning Trajectory Perspective,” ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1–26, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1145/3494579.

E. Kutay and D. Oner, “Coding with Minecraft: The Development of Middle School Students’ Computational Thinking,” ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1–19, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1145/3471573.

H. S. Kim, S. Kim, W. Na, and W. J. Lee, “Extending Computational Thinking into Information and Communication Technology Literacy Measurement,” ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–25, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1145/3427596.

R. P. Y. Lai, “Beyond Programming: A Computer-Based Assessment of Computational Thinking Competency,” ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1–27, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1145/3486598.

J. Corbin and A. Strauss, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. California, 2014.

J. A. Rodríguez-Martínez, J. A. González-Calero, and J. M. Sáez-López, “Computational thinking and mathematics using Scratch: an experiment with sixth-grade students,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 316–327, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448.

W. A. Hazaymeh and M. K. Alomery, “The Effectiveness of Visual Mind Mapping Strategy for Improving English Language Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills and Reading Ability,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 141–150, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.141.

A. D. Herlambang, O. D. Fransisca, and T. Afirianto, “The Flipped-Classroom Instructional Procedure Development and Its Implementation Effectiveness in Improving Procedural Knowledge Learning Outcomes at Vocational High Schools,” Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, Vocat. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 201–213, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.21831/elinvo.v8i2.57845.

A. D. Herlambang, R. Ririn, and A. Rachmadi, “The flipped-classroom effect on vocational high school students’ learning outcomes,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, p. 1807, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26757.

C. Angeli and N. Valanides, “Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 105, p. 105954, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018.

J. Jovanović, D. Gašević, S. Dawson, A. Pardo, and N. Mirriahi, “Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 33, pp. 74–85, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.001.

S. K. W. Chu et al., “The effectiveness of wikis for project-based learning in different disciplines in higher education,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 33, pp. 49–60, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.005.

A. D. Herlambang, “Social Media Platforms Utilization Influence on The Vocational High School Students’ Learning Interests and Learning Outcomes in Computer Network Subjects,” in 2023 Eighth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), Dec. 2023, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/ICIC60109.2023.10381951.

K. Tomita, “Does the Visual Appeal of Instructional Media Affect Learners’ Motivation Toward Learning?,” TechTrends, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 103–112, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11528-017-0213-1.

M. Salehudin, M. Nasir, S. H. Hamzah, R. Toba, N. Hayati, and I. Safiah, “The Users’ Experiences in Processing Visual Media for Creative and Online Learning Using Instagram,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. volume-10-, no. volume-10-issue-4-october-2021, pp. 1669–1682, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.1669.

A. D. Herlambang and A. Rachmadi, “The Online Learning Interest and Learning Outcomes Through Mobile and Desktop Application Based on the Indonesian Information Technology Majoring Vocational High School Student’s Perspective,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology, Oct. 2023, pp. 354–360. doi: 10.1145/3626641.3627020.

T. Chamidy, İ. N. S. Degeng, and S. Ulfa, “The Effect of Problem Based Learning and Tacit Knowledge on Problem-Solving Skills of Students in Computer Network Practice Course,” J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 691–700, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.17478/jegys.650400.

H. Bai, X. Wang, and L. Zhao, “Effects of the Problem-Oriented Learning Model on Middle School Students’ Computational Thinking Skills in a Python Course,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771221.

M. Robherta, A. Dwi Herlambang, and S. Hadi Wijoyo, “The Differences of Student’s Learning Outcomes and Instructional Interactions between Project Based Learning and Problem Based Learning Methods by Using Web Based Learning Technique in the Course of Videography at SMKN 1 Purwosari,” J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 225–235, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.25126/jitecs.202163305.

A. Treffers, “Direct instruction and problem-solving: Critical examination of Cognitive Load Theory from the perspective of mathematics education,” Math. Enthus., vol. 16, no. 1–3, pp. 607–620, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.54870/1551-3440.1475.

L. A. Zampetakis, L. Tsironis, and V. Moustakis, “Creativity development in engineering education: the case of mind mapping,” J. Manag. Dev., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 370–380, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1108/02621710710740110.

C. Lang, A. Craig, and G. Casey, “A pedagogy for outreach activities in ICT: Promoting peer to peer learning, creativity and experimentation,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1491–1501, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12501.

C. Zhou, A. Kolmos, and J. D. Nielsen, “A Problem and Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach to Motivate Group Creativity in Engineering Education,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2012.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v9i1.64501

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Our Journal indexed by:

ISSN 2477-2399 (online) || ISSN 2580-6424 (print)

View My Stats

Flag Counter