Email this article 
The Flipped-Classroom Instructional Procedure Development and Its Implementation Effectiveness in Improving Procedural Knowledge Learning Outcomes at Vocational High Schools
Olivia Dyah Fransisca, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Tri Afirianto, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Abstract
The students’ number limitation in a classroom and the compression of face-to-face time challenge teachers to present practical learning scenarios to achieve learning objectives. This study aims to develop student learning procedures with the flipped classroom (FC) instructional model and determine its use in improving student learning outcomes. The research was conducted at a public information technology vocational high school in Malang, East Java Province, Indonesia. The FC instructional procedure development approach is based on the ADDIE (analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation) phase. The FC instructional procedure was developed in conjunction with a constructivist instructional strategy, consisting of five primary stages: (1) perception, (2) exploration, (3) restructuring, (4) implementation, and (5) review and evaluation. FC instructional procedure effectiveness was tested using the Randomized Pre-test and Post-test Control Group Design research design. The control and experimental groups consist of 30 students with randomization. The research found that the learning outcomes of the experimental group (EGLO = 70.00) were greater than those of the control group (CGLO = 64.30). The normalized gain index of the experimental groups (g = 0.50) was more significant than the control groups (g = 0.41). The conclusion is that the FC procedures with a constructivist approach have proven more effective in improving student learning outcomes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
S. Hrastinski, “What Do We Mean by Blended Learning?,” TechTrends, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 564–569, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5.
R. A. Rasheed, A. Kamsin, and N. A. Abdullah, “Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review,” Comput Educ, vol. 144, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701.
C. Müller and T. Mildenberger, “Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education,” Educ Res Rev, vol. 34, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394.
B. Basori, S. Sajidan, M. Akhyar, and W. Wiranto, “Blended learning model towards vocational students’ learning outcomes: A scoping review,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 205–215, 2023, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v12i1.22986.
B. Anthony et al., “Blended Learning Adoption and Implementation in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Systematic Review,” Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 531–578, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z.
Z. Turan and B. Akdag-Cimen, “Flipped classroom in English language teaching: a systematic review,” Comput Assist Lang Learn, vol. 33, no. 5–6, pp. 590–606, 2020, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117.
D. Zou, S. Luo, H. Xie, and G. J. Hwang, “A systematic review of research on flipped language classrooms: theoretical foundations, learning activities, tools, research topics and findings,” Comput Assist Lang Learn, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1811–1837, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1839502.
L. J. Day, “A gross anatomy flipped classroom effects performance, retention, and higher-level thinking in lower performing students,” Anat Sci Educ, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 565–574, 2018, doi: 10.1002/ase.1772.
F. J. Hinojo Lucena, I. A. Díaz, J. M. Romero Rodríguez, and J. A. Marín Marín, “Influence of the flipped classroom on academic performance. A systematic review,” Campus Virtuales, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85068354793
R. Martínez-Jiménez and M. C. Ruiz-Jiménez, “Improving students’ satisfaction and learning performance using flipped classroom,” International Journal of Management Education, vol. 18, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100422.
Y. T. Lin, “Impacts of a flipped classroom with a smart learning diagnosis system on students’ learning performance, perception, and problem solving ability in a software engineering course,” Comput Human Behav, vol. 95, pp. 187–196, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.036.
R. Fisher, Á. Perényi, and N. Birdthistle, “The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction,” Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 97–113, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1469787418801702.
H. Luo, T. Yang, J. Xue, and M. Zuo, “Impact of student agency on learning performance and learning experience in a flipped classroom,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 819–831, 2019, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12604.
P. Strelan, A. Osborn, and E. Palmer, “The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels,” Educ Res Rev, vol. 30, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314.
H. C. Lin and G. J. Hwang, “Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: a review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1011–1027, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1467462.
J. Phillips and F. Wiesbauer, “The flipped classroom in medical education: A new standard in teaching,” Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, vol. 42, pp. 4–8, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tacc.2022.01.001.
G. Akçayır and M. Akçayır, “The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges,” Comput Educ, vol. 126, pp. 334–345, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021.
Z. Zainuddin and M. Attaran, “Malaysian students’ perceptions of flipped classroom: a case study,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 660–670, 2016, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1102079.
H. Haghighi, M. Jafarigohar, H. Khoshsima, and F. Vahdany, “Impact of flipped classroom on EFL learners’ appropriate use of refusal: achievement, participation, perception,” Comput Assist Lang Learn, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 261–293, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1504083.
C. L. Koo, E. L. Demps, C. Farris, J. D. Bowman, L. Panahi, and P. Boyle, “Impact of flipped classroom design on student performance and perceptions in a pharmacotherapy course,” Am J Pharm Educ, vol. 80, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.5688/ajpe80233.
C. K. Lo, C. W. Lie, and K. F. Hew, “Applying ‘First Principles of Instruction’ as a design theory of the flipped classroom: Findings from a collective study of four secondary school subjects,” Comput Educ, vol. 118, pp. 150–165, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.003.
Z. Zainuddin and S. H. Halili, “Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study,” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 313–340, 2016, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274.
D. Hurrell, “Conceptual Knowledge OR Procedural Knowledge or Conceptual Knowledge AND Procedural Knowledge: Why the Conjunction is Important to Teachers,” Australian Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 57–71, 2021, doi: 10.14221/ajte.2021v46n2.4.
T. Yi, X. Yang, Z. Pi, L. Huang, and J. Yang, “Teachers’ continuous vs. intermittent presence in procedural knowledge instructional videos,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 481–492, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2018.1470020.
G. Young, “Knowledge How, Procedural Knowledge, and the Type-Token Action Clause,” Acta Analytica, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 327–343, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12136-018-0376-1.
Y.-T. Chen, S. Liou, and S.-M. Chen, “Flipping the procedural knowledge learning – a case study of software learning,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 428–441, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1579231.
B. H. Majeed, “The relationship between conceptual knowledge and procedural knowledge among students of the mathematics department at the faculty of education for pure sciences/IBn Al-Haitham, university of Baghdad,” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 333–346, 2020, Accessed: Jun. 27, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol12/iss4/12439_Majeed_2020_E_R.pdf
A. D. Herlambang, B. Budiman, and W. S. Wardhono, “Interactive Procedural Knowledge Learning Resources Development in The Context of Competency-Based Training Instructional Approach and Interactive Media Design Subjects for Information Technology Vocational High School,” Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education); Vol 7, No 1 (2022): Mei 2022DO - 10.21831/elinvo.v7i1.48215 , Aug. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v7i1.48215.
L. K. J. Baartman and E. De Bruijn, “Integrating knowledge, skills and attitudes: Conceptualising learning processes towards vocational competence,” Educational Research Review, vol. 6, no. 2. pp. 125–134, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.03.001.
H. Schaap, L. Baartman, and E. de Bruijn, “Students’ Learning Processes during School-Based Learning and Workplace Learning in Vocational Education: A Review,” Vocations and Learning, vol. 5, no. 2. pp. 99–117, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s12186-011-9069-2.
Suharno, N. A. Pambudi, and B. Harjanto, “Vocational education in Indonesia: History, development, opportunities, and challenges,” Child Youth Serv Rev, vol. 115, no. 2020, p. 105092, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105092.
H. Morgan, K. Mclean, C. Chapman, J. Fitzgerald, A. Yousuf, and M. Hammoud, “The flipped classroom for medical students,” Clinical Teacher, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 155–160, 2015, doi: 10.1111/tct.12328.
F. Chen, A. M. Lui, and S. M. Martinelli, “A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education,” Med Educ, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 585–597, 2017, doi: 10.1111/medu.13272.
C. J. Ramnanan and L. D. Pound, “Advances in medical education and practice: student perceptions of the flipped classroom,” Adv Med Educ Pract, vol. 8, pp. 63–73, 2017, doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S109037.
S. E. Street, K. O. Gilliland, C. McNeil, and K. Royal, “The Flipped Classroom Improved Medical Student Performance and Satisfaction in a Pre-clinical Physiology Course,” Med Sci Educ, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s40670-014-0092-4.
K. S. Chen et al., “Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: a meta-analysis,” Med Educ, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 910–924, 2018, doi: 10.1111/medu.13616.
F. Tang et al., “Comparison between flipped classroom and lecture-based classroom in ophthalmology clerkship,” Med Educ Online, vol. 22, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1395679.
K. F. Hew and C. K. Lo, “Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis,” BMC Med Educ, vol. 18, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z.
J. Moffett and A. C. Mill, “Evaluation of the flipped classroom approach in a veterinary professional skills course,” Adv Med Educ Pract, vol. 5, pp. 415–425, 2014, doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S70160.
L. P. Galway, K. K. Corbett, T. K. Takaro, K. Tairyan, and E. Frank, “A novel integration of online and flipped classroom instructional models in public health higher education,” BMC Med Educ, vol. 14, no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-181.
J. Ferrer-Torregrosa, M. Á. Jiménez-Rodríguez, J. Torralba-Estelles, F. Garzón-Farinós, M. Pérez-Bermejo, and N. Fernández-Ehrling, “Distance learning ects and flipped classroom in the anatomy learning: Comparative study of the use of augmented reality, video and notes,” BMC Med Educ, vol. 16, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0757-3.
D. Gong, H. H. Yang, and J. Cai, “Exploring the key influencing factors on college students’ computational thinking skills through flipped-classroom instruction,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 17, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00196-0.
T. Long, J. Cummins, and M. Waugh, “Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: instructors’ perspectives,” J Comput High Educ, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 179–200, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s12528-016-9119-8.
B. McNally et al., “Flipped classroom experiences: student preferences and flip strategy in a higher education context,” High Educ (Dordr), vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 281–298, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0014-z.
R. Kay, T. MacDonald, and M. DiGiuseppe, “A comparison of lecture-based, active, and flipped classroom teaching approaches in higher education,” J Comput High Educ, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 449–471, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12528-018-9197-x.
T. Mahfud, I. Siswanto, D. S. Wijayanto, and P. F. Puspitasari, “Antecedent factors of vocational high school students’ readiness for selecting careers: A case in Indonesia,” Cakrawala Pendidikan, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 633–644, 2020, doi: 10.21831/cp.v39i3.32310.
Suryaman, A. Zaki, Suharyanto, and S. Winoto, “Tripartite Interconnection to Serve High Quality and Competitiveness of Vocational School Students in Industry,” Journal of Social Studies Education Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 75–96, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85163020652
S. M. Dougherty and A. R. Lombardi, “From Vocational Education to Career Readiness: The Ongoing Work of Linking Education and the Labor Market,” Review of Research in Education, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 326–355, 2016, doi: 10.3102/0091732X16678602.
B. Pandiya, V. Tewari, and C. K. Upadhyay, “An empirical assessment of antecedents able to attract the prospective talented workforce for information technology industry across borders,” European Journal of International Management, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 491–517, 2023, doi: 10.1504/EJIM.2023.129531.
C. Ismaniati, A. Muhtadi, D. Y. Cobena, and P. L. Soeparno, “Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on Students’ Learning Outcome in Vocational High School: A Meta-Analysis,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 589–604, 2023, doi: 10.29333/iji.2023.16133a.
L. Cheng, A. D. Ritzhaupt, and P. Antonenko, “Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 793–824, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7.
B. Ghirardini, E-Learning Methodologies: A Guide for Designing and Developing E-Learning Courses. Rome: Federal Ministry of Food. Rome: FAO, 2011.
R. M. Branch, Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York: Springer, 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6.
Y. Hanafi, N. M. Murtadho, A. Ikhsan, and T. N. Diyana, “Reinforcing public university student’s worship education by developing and implementing mobile-learning management system in the ADDIE instructional design model,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 215–241, 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v14i02.11380.
P. Johannesson and E. Perjons, An Introduction to Design Science, 2nd ed. Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78132-3.
J. R. Fraenkel, N. E. Wallen, and H. H. Hyun, How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw Hill LLC, 2022. Accessed: Jun. 27, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mheducation.com/highered/product/how-design-evaluate-research-education-fraenkel-wallen/M9781259913839.html
J. Pallant, SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. United Kingdom: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill, 2020.
S. Caldwell, Statistics Unplugged, 4th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth,Cengage Learning, 2013.
S. Dwijonagoro and S. Suparno, “Pranatacara learning: Modeling, mind mapping, e-learning, or hybrid learning?,” Cakrawala Pendidikan, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 156–173, 2019, doi: 10.21831/cp.v38i1.23034.
C. K. Lo, “Grounding the flipped classroom approach in the foundations of educational technology,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 793–811, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11423-018-9578-x.
X. Wei et al., “Effect of the flipped classroom on the mathematics performance of middle school students,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1461–1484, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09752-x.
Y. Li, H. H. Yang, and J. MacLeod, “Preferences toward the constructivist smart classroom learning environment: examining pre-service teachers’ connectedness,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 349–362, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1474232.
M. Tam, “Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning,” Educational Technology and Society, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 50–60, 2000, [Online]. Available: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/1842815361
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v8i2.57845
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Our Journal indexed by:
ISSN 2477-2399 (online) || ISSN 2580-6424 (print)
