2.png){kind=logo}
Email this article EVALUASI PERSPEKTIF POLITIK TRUMP PADA “SAVE AMERICA RALLY”
Annas Annas, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Sumarlam Sumarlam, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Abstract
(Title: The Evaluation of Trump’s Political Perspectives at The “Save America Rally”). This paper explores Trump speech in online media CBC news entitled “Live Coverage: Protesters Swarm Capitol, Abruptly Halting Electoral Vote Count” in the point of view of discourse analysis. This research belongs to qualitative research. The method used to analyze is distributional and referential method. It analyzed Trump ideology’s Perspectives through structure manifested by Emotive words, phrases, sentences from his speech, specifically it explored from critical discourse analysis conducted by Teun A .Van Dijk. It resulted and indicated that Trump conveyed his political will by protesting the result of the ballots. He said there was fraud in the middle of the election. In fact, instead of protesting the election, he also conveyed the autocritics towards the government (himself).
Key Words: speech, Trumps, critical discourse analysis, ideology
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul, Rani. (2015). Analisis wacana kritis: reproduksi gaya hidup dalam iklan televisi. Diksi. Vol. 23/1, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v23i1.6619.
Baklauti, Sellami Akila. (2019). Transitivity-ergativity perspectives on causation in legal texts: A contrastive study of Arabic and English website terms of service. Lingua. 1-19. https://doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102782.
Busri,Hasan. (2009). Representasi kebahasaan dalam teks berita surat kabar: Sebuah analisis wacana kritis. Vol.16 No,1, 19-25. https://doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v16i1.6564.
Chomsky, A. N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague. Janua, Linguarum, Series Minor 4.
Dijk, Teun A. van. (1977). Text and context. Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longmans.
Dijk, Teun A. van. 1(977b). Macro-structures, knowledge frames and discourse comprehension. Carnegie-Mellon Symposium on Cognition, 1-32.
Dijk, Teun A. van. (1977c). Pragmatic macro-structures in discourse and cognition. Paper, International Workshop on The Cognitive Viewpoint. In M. de Mey et al., eds. CC 77., 99-113.
Dijk, Teun A. van, and Walter Kintsch. (1977). Cognitive psychology and discourse . In: W.U. Dressier, ed., Current trends in text linguistics. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
Eriyanto. (2012). Analisis wacana: pengantar analisis teks media. Yogyakarta: PT. LKiS Printing Cemerlang.
Ekawati, Rosyida. (2015). Language appraisal on attitudinal systems for exploring ideology in death penalty in sydney morning herald sun Editorials. Humaniora, 7(3), 362-373. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.10596.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd Ed). London: Edward Arnold.
Leech, Geoffrey. (2005). “Politeness: is there an East-West Divide?” Journal of Foreign language: China: 宋淇翻译研究论文纪念奖征文通知
Leech, Geoffrey. (2014). Pragmatik of politeness. United States: Oxford University Press.
L. Grundlingh. (2018). Exploring the possibility of using appraisal Theory to Determine the Legitimacy of Suicide Notes. Elsevier, 214, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.07.004.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, J.R. (2000). Close reading: Functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis. In unsworth, L., Ed., Reseraching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistics perspectives, 257-303London & Washington: Cassel.
Martin, J. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: solidarity and change.Revista Cannaria de Estudios inglese, 49, 179-200.
Martin, J.R 2009. Genre and language leraning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistcs an dEducation, 20(1), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003.
Martin, J.R (2015). Cohesion and texture. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E., & Schriffrin, D., Eds., The Handbook of discourse analysis (2nd Ed). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
Martin, J.R & White, P.R.R (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martutik. (2014). Representasi konsumerisme dalam advertorial prenagen: Kajian wacana kritis. Diksi. 2 (22). https://doi.org/1021831/diksi.v2i22.3165.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Riyadi, S (2013). Semiotika social: pandangan terhadap bahasa. Surabaya: Pustaka Eureka & JP press.
Richouer, P. (1960). Philosophie de la volonté. Finitude et Culpabilité. II. La symbolique du mal, Paris: Aubier. (English version 1967, The Symbolism of Evil, trans. Emerson Buchanan, Boston: Beacon.
Richouer, Paul. (1969). Le conflit des interprétations. Essais d’herméneutique, Paris: Seuil. (English version 1974, The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays 138 FURTHER READING in Hermeneutics, ed. Don Ihde, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Insani, N. H. (2019). Konstruksi budaya dakwah Emha Ainun Nadjib dalam acara Mocopat Syafaat sebagai medium resistensi. Diksi, Vol 7 No 2, 87-101.https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v27i2.24439
Richouer, P (1976). Interpretation theory: discourse and the surplus of Meaning, Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
Setiawan, T. (2014). Ancangan awal praktik analisis wacana kritis. Diksi, 22(2), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v2i22.3170.
Sobur, A. (2015). Analisis teks media: suatu pengantar untuk analisis wacana, analisis semiotik, dan analisis framing. Bandung: Indonesia. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Spradley, J.P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wiston.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan aneka teknik penelitian bahasa. Indonesia: Duta Wacana University Press.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan r&d. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Waskita, D. (2014). Transitivity in telephone conversation in a bribery case in indonesia: a forensic linguistics study. Jurnal Sosio teknologi, 13(2), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2014.13.2.3.
Wiratno, T. (2018). Pengantar Ringkas Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v29i2.37826
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Diksi
Jurnal Diksi is published by Faculty of Languages, Arts, and Culture, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. It is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/diksi
Our Journal has been Indexed by:
Diksi Journal is published by the Faculty of Languages, Arts, and Culture Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta in collaboration with Himpunan Sarjana Kesusasteraan Indonesia (HISKI)
Supervised by:
