PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF ART AND SCIENCE INTEGRATION IN CLASSROOM

Dwi Wulandari, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


       Karakteristik seni dan sains atau Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) yang memiliki kesamaan dan saling melengkapi satu sama lain telah mendorong upaya untuk menghubungkan seni dan sains dalam pendidikan guna mencapai pembelajaran yang lebih berkualitas. Namun dalam penerapannya, khususnya di sekolah dasar (SD), diperlukan pehamaman tentang persepsi peserta didik terhadap keterkaitan antara seni dan sains agar pembelajaran terintegrasi yang dilaksanakan sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan kondisi peserta didik. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah  untuk memahami bagaimana siswa sekolah dasar mengalami dan memahami hubungan antara seni dan IPA dalam konteks pembelajaran di kelas. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian tindakan yang bersifat etnografis berskala kecil dengan menempatkan peneliti sebagai guru-peneliti. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi persepsi tiga belas siswa kelas 5 di satu Sekolah Dasar Negeri di Papua Barat, Indonesia. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan metode observasi dan wawancara dengan instrumen berupa catatan lapangan, video, rekaman audio, dan transkripsi. Data kemudian dianalisis menggunakan pendekatan analisis tematik. Ditemukan adanya perubahan persepsi peserta didik yang awalnya mendikotomi antara seni dan sains yang kemudian beralih menjadi menganggap bahwa kedua disiplin ilmu tersebut memiliki kesamaan dan keterhubungan. Persepsi siswa nampaknya dipengaruhi oleh kondisi penelitian yang menciptakan suasana pembelajaran tematik terintegrasi, pengalaman siswa sebelumnya, manajemen jadwal pembelajaran, serta kondisi dan pengaturan kelas, guru dan sekolah.

 

Kata Kunci: persepsi siswa, integrasi seni-sains, STEAM Education

 

 

PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF ART AND SCIENCE INTEGRATION IN CLASSROOM

 

Abstract

 

       Art and science have been long studied that have commonalities and complementary to each other. Some experts have considered the possibility of connecting these two disciplines in education to achieve higher quality learning. However, in its application especially in primary schools, understanding of students' perceptions toward the interrelationship of art and science is needed so that integrated learning is carried out in accordance with the needs and natural conditions of pupils. Using small scale ethnographic action research in which I took on the principal role as teacher-researcher, the present research aims to understand how primary school students experience and perceive the relationship between art and science within classroom context. The study explored the perception of thirteen Year-5 pupils in one state school in West Papua, Indonesia. Data were gathered using observation and interview methods using field notes, videos, audio recordings, and transcriptions and the analysed using a thematic analysis approach. It is found that there has been a shift of their perceptions from initially dichotomising art and science as two different areas, to seeing similarities and connections between the two disciplines. The pupils’ perceptions are seemingly influenced by the nature of the study which aims to link the art and science, student’s previous experiences, timetable management, teachers, classroom and school settings and conditions.

 

Keywords: Students’ perception; art-science integration, STEAM Education.


Keywords


students’ perception; art; science; integrated learning; STEAM Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barnes, J. 2015. Cross-curricular Learning 3-14. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Baumfield, V., Hall, E., & Wall, K. 2008. Action Research in the Classroom. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

BERA. 2011. Ethical Guidances for Educational Research. Retrieved from: https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-2011.pdf?noredirect=1 [Accessed: February 20th, 2017]

Bohm, D. 1998. in Nichol, L (ed) (1998) On Creativity. London. Routledge.

Caranfa, A. 2001. Art and Science: The Aesthetic Education of the Emotions and Reason. Journal of Art and Design Education, 20(2), 151- 160.

Chappell, K., Charlotte, S., Alison, B., & Margo, G., with Craft, A. (n. d) CREAT-IT: A New Pedagogical Framework For Partnering The Arts And Science In Science Education. Artikel tidak dipublikasikan. University of Exeter.

Colombo, U. 1994. Science and art, World Futures, 40:1-3, 1-5.

Daugherty, M. K. 2013. The Prospect of an “A” in STEM Education, Journal of STEM Education, 14(2), 10-15.

Deckert, D. 2001. Science and Art: Lessons from Leonardo da Vinci in Burnaford, G. Aprill, A & Weiss, C. (eds). 2001. Renaissance in the Classroom, Arts Integration and Meaningful Learning. London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Dewey, J. 1980. Art as Experience. London: Penguin.

Eisner, E. W. 2002. The Arts and The Creation of The Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. 2012. How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gardener, H. 1983. Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Iryanti, V. E. 2016. Aesthetic Enjoyment in Arts A Philosophical Study, Imaji Jornal, 14(2), 1-12.

Kasiyan. 2017. When Artists Ask Questions About Society: The Dialectical Tension Between Moment Of Beauty and Truth, Imaji Journal, 15(1), 37-47.

Kemendibud. 2013. Kurikulum 2013: Kompetensi Dasar Sekolah Dasar (SD)/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI). Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemendikbud. 2014. Organ Tubuh Manusia dan Hewan : buku guru. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemendikbud. 2016. Permendikbud No. 24 Tahun 2016 tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemp, M. 2000. Visualizations, The Nature Book of Art and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. 2012. Experiential learning theory. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 1215–1219). New York: Springer US.

Kouzminov, V. 1994. Remarks on art and science, World Futures, 40(1-3), 115-117

McNaughton, M. J. 2010. Educational drama in education for sustainable development: ecopedagogy in action, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18:3, 289-308.

Pine, G. J. 2009. Teacher Action Research: Building knowledge democracies. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Pole, C., & Morrison, M. 2003. Ethnography for Education. Berkshire: Open University Press.

Robson, D., Hickey, I., & Flanagan, M. 2005. Flights of Imagination: Synchronised Integration of Art and Science in the Primary School Curriculum, Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Glamorgan, 14-17 September 2005.

Russell-Bowie, D. 2009. Syntegration or Disintegration? Models of Integrating the Arts Across the Primary Curriculum, International Journal of Education & the Arts, 10(28), 1-23.

Snow, C.P. 1960. The two cultures and the scientific revolution. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Turkka, J., Haatainen, O. & Aksela, M. 2017. Integrating art into science education: a survey of science teachers’ practices, International Journal of Science Education, 39:10, 1403-1419.

Wenham, M. 1998. Art and Science in Education: The Common Ground. Journal of Art and Design Education, 17(1).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/imaji.v18i1.27836

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Supervised by

RJI Main logo


Our Journal has been Indexed by:

       

 Creative Commons License

website statistics View My Stats