Comparative analysis of archers’ shooting performance scores by gender
Keywords:
archery, gender, shooting performance, shooting score, archersAbstract
Empirical evidence regarding gender differences in archery shooting performance remains inconsistent.
This study aims to compare shooting performance scores between male and female archers. A
comparative cross-sectional design was employed, involving 35 archers consisting of 16 males and 19
females selected through total sampling. Shooting performance was assessed in a single testing session
comprising 36 arrows. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Shapiro–Wilk test,
Levene’s test, an independent-samples t-test, and Cohen’s d effect size. The results revealed no
statistically significant difference in shooting performance scores between male and female archers,
t(33) = −0.920, p = .364. The effect size was small (Cohen's d = 0.31), indicating only a minor practical
difference between the two groups. These findings suggest that gender may not be a primary factor
determining archery shooting performance. Therefore, coaching programs should place greater
emphasis on athletes’ individual abilities and performance characteristics rather than relying solely on
gender-based considerations.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muh Batistuta Fitoni Nuradila, Yudik Prasetyo, Heru Prasetyo, Okky Indera Pamungkas S, Hary Widodo, Oviesta Tasha Retyananda, Septian Resi Wibowo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
