Adaptasi SInAPsi academic engagement scale (SAES) versi Indonesia

Authors

  • Sinartan Adlan Pangaribawa Hidayat Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/ap.v5i2.71949

Keywords:

academic engagement, skala, instrumen, pendidikan

Abstract

Performa, hasil, dan permasalahan dalam dunia akademik salah satunya dipengaruhi oleh keterlibatan akademik. Keterlibatan akademik membawa dampak yang baik bagi siswa maupun mahasiswa. Namun konstruk engagement ini lebih sering diteliti dalam konteks pekerjaan sehingga diperlukan fokus dalam konstrak keterlibatan akademik. Maka dari itu untuk mendukung penelitian mengenai keterlibatan akademik diperlukan skala yang dapat mengukur konstrak dengan baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengadaptasi skala SInAPsi Academic Engagement Scale ke bahasa Indonesia. Langkah penelitian meliputi forward translation, sintesis, back translation, dan back translation review. Pengujian lapangan skala versi Bahasa Indonesia melibatkan 103 mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa skala memiliki reliabilitas keseluruhan yang sangat baik yaitu 0,909 dengan indeks diskriminan yang berkisar antara 0,403- 0,869. Hal ini berarti SAES versi Indonesia merupakan skala yang reliabel dalam mengukur keterlibatan akademik

Author Biography

Sinartan Adlan Pangaribawa Hidayat, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education & Psychology, Yogyakarta State University.

References

Azwar, S. (2016). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi (2nd ed.). Pustaka Belajar.

Christenson, S., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement (Vol. 840). Springer.

Freda, M. F., De Luca, &, Raffaele, P., Esposito, G., Ragozini, G., & Testa, I. (2021). A new measure for the assessment of the university engagement: The SInAPSi academic engagement scale (SAES). Current Psychology, 42, 9674–9690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02189-2/Published

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2014). Psychometrics: An introduction (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (n.d.). Peluang. Kbbi.Web.Id Dictionary. Retrieved December 6, 2023, from https://kbbi.web.id/peluang

Ljubin-Golub, T., Rijavec, M., & JurÄec, L. (2018). Flow in the academic domain: The role of perfectionism and engagement. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0369-2

Martí­nez, I. M., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., Chambel, M. J., & Marques-Pinto, A. (2019). Antecedents of academic performance of university students: academic engagement and psychological capital resources. Educational Psychology, 39(8), 1047–1067.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1623382

Passeggia, R., Testa, I., Esposito, G., Picione, R. D. L., Ragozini, G., & Freda, M. F. (2023). Examining the relation between first-year university students' intention to drop-out and academic engagement: The role of motivation, subjective well-being and retrospective judgements of school experience. Innovative Higher Education, 48(5), 837–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09674-5

Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019. Research Policy, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114

PetriÄević, E., Ljubin Golub, T., & Rovan, D. (2016). Development and validation of the Academic Engagement Scale (AES). 12th Alps-Adria Psychology Conference.

Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., Martí­nez, I. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic work groups: An experimental study. Small Group Research, 34(1), 43–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496402239577

Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W., Martí­nez, I., & Bresó, E. (2009). How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: The mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 23(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800802609965

Schaufeli, W. B., Martí­nez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Barker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students a cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Hapiness Studies, 3, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326

Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2

Sofroniou, N., & Hutcheson, G. D. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. The Multivariate Social Scientist.

The Jamovi Project. (2022). Jamovi (2.3).

Truta, C., Parv, L., & Topala, I. (2018). Academic engagement and intention to drop out: Levers for sustainability in higher education.

Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12), 4637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124637

Downloads

Published

2024-05-17

How to Cite

Hidayat, S. A. P. (2024). Adaptasi SInAPsi academic engagement scale (SAES) versi Indonesia. Acta Psychologia, 5(2), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.21831/ap.v5i2.71949

Issue

Section

Articles