Email this article PENALARAN ASOSIATIF DAN DISOSIATIF DALAM DEBAT POLITIK DI TELEVISI
Abstract
This study aims to explain the associative and dissociative reasoning in politicaldebates. The data sources were communication events in the political debates emerging in
the reform era, before the 2009 general election. The data were analyzed using a qualitativedata analysis adopted from Miles and Huberman. The fi ndings show that associativereasoning includes quasi-logic, analogy, generalization, causality, and co-existence.
Dissociative reasoning includes policy and ideological dissociation. The diff erence inperspectives results in the diff erence in the ways of looking at political issues and debatecomplexity. Reasoning in political debates has two objectives, namely rationality to produce sound arguments and institutional interests to achieve a political agenda.
the reform era, before the 2009 general election. The data were analyzed using a qualitativedata analysis adopted from Miles and Huberman. The fi ndings show that associativereasoning includes quasi-logic, analogy, generalization, causality, and co-existence.
Dissociative reasoning includes policy and ideological dissociation. The diff erence inperspectives results in the diff erence in the ways of looking at political issues and debatecomplexity. Reasoning in political debates has two objectives, namely rationality to produce sound arguments and institutional interests to achieve a political agenda.
Full Text:
PDFDOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v11i1.1153
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
______________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
The International Journal of Linguistic, Literature, and Its Teaching at http://http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/litera/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
__________________________________________________________________________________________________