Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika berorientasi konstruktivisme untuk siswa SMK kompetensi keahlian teknik komputer dan jaringan

Dwi Astuti, Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Heri Retnawati, Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran berorientasi konstruktivisme, meliputi Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP), Lembar Kegiatan Siswa (LKS), dan Tes Hasil Belajar (THB) mata pelajaran matematika SMK kompetensi keahlian Teknik komputer dan Jaringan (TKJ) yang valid, praktis, dan efektif. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan model 4D yang terdiri atas empat tahap, yaitu: (1) defining (pendefinisian); (2) designing (perancangan); (3) developing (pengembangan); (4) disseminating (diseminasi). Subjek uji coba penelitian yaitu 56 peserta didik SMK Muhamamdiyah 2 Yogyakarta dan seorang guru matematika SMK Muhammadiyah 2 Yogyakarta. Data kevalidan dan kepraktisan dikonversikan dari data kuantitatif menjadi data kualitatif dengan menggunakan tabel kriteria. Data keefektifan dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji one sample t-test.  Untuk menguji kelebihefektifan perangkat pembelajaran berorientasi konstruktivisme daripada perangkat pembelajaran konvensional, data dianalisis dengan menggunakan MANOVA yang kemudian dilanjutkan dengan uji t-Benferroni. Hasil validasi menunjukkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran valid. Perangkat pembelajaran telah memenuhi kriteria  praktis. Hasil pengujian keefektifan menunjukkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran berorientasi konstruktivisme lebih efektif daripada perangkat pembelajaran konvensional untuk materi peluang ditinjau dari aspek hasil belajar dan kepercayaan diri peserta didik.

Kata kunci: pengembangan, perangkat pembelajaran, konstruktivisme, kepercayaan diri

 

DEVELOPING A CONSTRUCTIVISM LEARNING KIT OF MATHEMATICS

FOR VOCATIONAL SCHOOL STUDENTS IN COMPUTER AND NETWORKS ENGINEERING COMPETENCY

 

Abstract

This research was aimed to develop a Constructivist Learning Kit of Mathematics, consisting of valid, practical, and effective lesson plans, worksheets, and learning achievement tests (THB) The research was a 4D development research that consisted of four phases: (1) defining, (2) designing, (3) developing, (4) disseminating. The subjects of the research were 56 students of SMK Muhammadiyah 2 Yogyakarta and a mathematics teacher of SMK Muhammadiyah 2 Yogyakarta. The data of validity and practicality of the results was converted from quantitative data to qualitative data using the guideline criteria. The data of results of effectiveness was compared to other class that used the conventional learning kit. To test the effectiveness of the learning, test data were analyzed using a one sample t-test. To test the effectiveness of the learning-oriented excess of constructivism than conventional learning kit, the data were analyzed using MANOVA followed by t-test Benferroni. The products are valid and practical. The test results show that constructivism learning kit is more effective than conventional learning kit for probability material in terms learning achievement and self- confidence aspects.


Keywords: development, learning kit, constructivism, self-confidence

 


Keywords


pengembangan, perangkat pembelajaran, konstruktivisme, kepercayaan diri

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References


Brown, P. L., & Abell, S. K. (2007). Examining the learning cycle . Science and Children. Artikel. Diambil pada tanggal 21 Februari 2014 dari http://web.missouri.edu/~hanuscind/4280/ExaminingLearningCycle.pdf

Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (2009). Constructivist learning and teaching. Article. [Versi Elektronik]. Diambil pada tanggal 15 Januari 2014 dari www.nctm.org

Dehyadegary, E., et. al. (2012). Academic engagement as a mediator in relationship between emotional intelligence and academic achievement among adolescents in Kerman-Iran. Journal of American Science. 2012, 8(9): 823.

Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 22 tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi.

Gagnon, G. W. & Collay, M. (2006). Constructivst key questions for learning teaching to standards design. London: Corwin Press.

Ghufron, N. & Rini R.S. (2012). Teori-teori psikologi. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Hannula,M. S., Maijala, H., & Pehkonen, E. (2004). Development Of understanding and self-confidence in mathematics; Grades 5–8. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol 3, 17-24.

Harjanto. (2003). Perencanaan pengajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Jacobsen, D., Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (1989). Methods for teaching a skills approach (3rd ed). Columbus-Toronto-London-Melbourne: Merril Publishing Company.

Kemdikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No. 54 tahun 2013 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Kemdikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No. 65 tahun 2013 tentang Standar Proses.

Lie, A. (2003). 101 Cara menumbuhkan percaya diri anak. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Lindenfield , G. (1997). Mendidik anak agar percaya diri. (Terjemahan Ediati Kamil). London: Harper Collins Publisher. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 1994)

Lovat, T., et. al. (2011). Values pedagogy and student achievement. London: Springer.

Margono, G. (2005). Pengembangan instrumen pengukur rasa percaya diri mahasiswa terhadap matematika. [Versi Elektronik]. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 12.1, 45-61.

Matthews, M. R. (1998). Constructivism in science education : a phi1osophical examination. New South Wales: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Nunes, et. al. (2009). Development of maths capabilities and confidence in primary school. Research Report DCSF-RR118. Oxford United Kingdom: University of Oxford.

Orlich, D. C., et. al. (2007). Teaching strategies a guide to effective instruction. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Piaget, J. (1971). Genetic epistemology. New York: Norton Library.

Preston, L. D. (2007). 365 Steps to self-confidence. Oxford United Kingdom: How To Books, Ltd.

Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational psychology theory and practice (8th ed.). United States of America: Pearson Education Inc.

Stringer, E. T., Christensen, L. M., & Baldwin, S. C. (2010). Integrating teaching, learning, and action research enhancing instruction in the k-12 classroom. Los Angeles: SAGE

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Though and language. Baskerville United States of America: Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data

Yates, S.M. (2002). The Influence of Optimism and Pessimism on Student Achievement in Mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 4-15. Diakses pada tanggal 25 Februari 2014 dari: http:// www. merga.net.au/documents/MERJ_14_1_Yates.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v5i1.13482

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Dwi Astuti, Heri Retnawati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPMS Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains

 

 


Creative Commons License
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpms is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All rights reserved.

View JPMS Stats

==========================================================================================================

Supervised by:

RJI Main logo