Need analysis for innovation in integrated learning models for micro-teaching course: Explanatory sequential design

Jusuf Blegur; Amung Ma'mun; Berliana Berliana; Agus Mahendra; Michelle Mordeno Layao

doi:10.21831/jk.v12i1.71950

Need analysis for innovation in integrated learning models for micro-teaching course: Explanatory sequential design

Jusuf Blegur, Universitas Kristen Artha Wacana, Indonesia
Amung Ma'mun, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Berliana Berliana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Agus Mahendra, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Michelle Mordeno Layao, Mindanao State University, Philippines

10.21831/jk.v12i1.71950

Abstract

One of the keys to successful learning model development is conducting a comprehensive needs analysis on actual performance, desired performance, and causes of performance gaps. This research aims to analyze student performance needs so that they can become a credible basis for consideration when designing the syntax of learning experiences for integrated learning models for micro-teaching courses. Researchers used an explanatory sequential design when completing the study, so quantitative research became the main focus for data collection and analysis, which was emphasized by qualitative studies. There were 107 research respondents, namely 75 students, two lecturers, and 30 physical education teachers. Data on actual performance, desired performance, and causes of performance gaps on the variables of teaching skills, analytical thinking skills, academic integrity, and transformational leadership were collected using 12 statements. Qualitative data was collected using semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed descriptively and with Kruskal-Wallis to test differences in actual performance and desired performance of the three groups of respondents. Meanwhile, for qualitative data, researchers used thematic analysis. The results of the Kruskal-Wallis test prove that there are no significant differences between the three groups of respondents in actual performance (0.365> 0.05) or desired performance (0.758> 0.05). Students, lecturers, and teachers agree that teaching skills, analytical thinking skills, academic integrity, and transformational leadership are important requirements in developing integrated learning models. Meanwhile, the causes of performance gaps are not limited to lack of training experience, lack of opportunity to analyze problems and make decisions, lack of role models, or lack of support from lecturers and colleagues in lectures. Thus, in developing the model, the performance tasks designed must be able to overcome this performance gap by increasing students' experience in operational and clinical exercises during lectures

Keywords

needs analysis; micro-teaching model; integrated learning; teaching skills; analytical thinking; academic integrity; transformational leadership

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Abakay, U., Alincak, F., & Demir, H. (2016). The effects of microteaching practice on pre-service physical education and sport teachers’ attitudes towards teaching profession. European Journal of Education Studies, 2(9), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.167625

Ahmad Oudat, M. (2016). Challenges facing physical education teachers in Jordan from perspective of the teachers themselves. Advances in Physical Education, 6(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.4236/ape.2016.62005

Ahmed, M., & Godiyal, S. (2021). A study on teacher education in India: Physical education, some policy issues and challenges. Edu Sportivo: Indonesian Journal of Physical Education, 2(3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.25299/es:ijope.2021.vol2(3).7335

Almutairi, Y. M. N. (2022). Effects of academic integrity of faculty members on students’ ethical behavior. Education Research International, 2022, 6806752. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6806752

Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050

Baldwin, C. F. (2015). First-year physical education teachers’ experiences with teaching African refugee students. SAGE Open, 5(1), 215824401556973. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015569737

Blegur, J., & Lumba, A. J. F. (2022). Teaching skills of the prospective physical education teachers based on group learning commitment. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 11(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i1.34739

Blegur, J., Lumba, A. J. F., & Ngongo, M. (2023). Tracing physical education teachers’ teaching difficulties in online era using teaching skill indicators. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(1), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.15

Blegur, J., Ma’mun, A., Mahendra, A., Mahardika, I. M. S., & Tlonaen, Z. A. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of micro-teaching model research trends in 2013-2023. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 4(3), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v4i3.782

Blegur, J., Wasak, M. R. P., & Manu, L. (2017). Penilaian formatif peserta didik atas kompetensi pendidik dalam proses pembelajaran. Satya Widya, 33(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2017.v33.i2.p117-127

Blegur, J., Yustiana, Y. R., Taufiq, A., Ilham, M., & Hardiansyah, S. (2023). Integrating analytical thinking skills into physical education to improve student learning outcomes. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 11(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v11i2.61176

Branch, R. M. (2010). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). California: SAGE.

Evangelou, F. (2022). The contribution of microteaching in teaching practice: A research approach to Greek students, prospective teachers. International Journal of Education and Research, 10(12), 53–68. https://www.ijern.com/journal/2022/December-2022/05.pdf

Fishman, T. (2014). The fundamental values of academic integrity (2nd ed.). New York: International Center for Academic Integrity.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Hama, H. Q., & Osam, Ű. V. (2021). Revisiting microteaching in search of up-to-date solutions to old problems. SAGE Open, 11(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211061534

Handayani, F., Hartono, & Lestari, W. (2019). Need analysis in the development of HOTS-oriented study project assesment instrument in Android-Based Science Learning. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v8i1.31799

Iksan, Z. H., Zakaria, E., & Daud, Md. Y. (2014). Model of lesson study approach during micro teaching. International Education Studies, 7(13), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p253

International Centre for Academic Integrity. (2021). Fundamental values of academic integrity (3rd ed.). New York: International Centre for Academic Integrity.

Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260

Jovanovic, D., & Ciric, M. (2016). Benefits of transformational leadership in the context of education. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Science, 496–503. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.09.64

Kaya, S. (2021). From needs analysis to development of a vocational English language curriculum: A practical guide for practitioners. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(1), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021167471

Khairuddin, Masrun, Bakhtiar, S., & Syahruddin. (2023). An analysis of the learning implementation of physical education in junior high schools. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 42(1), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i1.54605

Kiliç, A. (2010). Learner-centered micro teaching in teacher education. International Journal of Instruction, 3(1), 77–100. www.e-iji.net

Lester, J. N., Cho, Y., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to do qualitative data analysis: A starting point. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320903890

Mahardika, I. M. S. (2015). Metodologi penelitian (1st ed.). Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Mu’arifin, & Narmaditya, B. S. (2022). Professional development program for physical education teachers in Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(3), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i3.49636

Muniri, & Choirudin. (2022). The flow of analytical thinking high cognitive level students in mathematics problem solving. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 6147–6158. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2413

Nugraha, B., Suharjana, & Lumintuarso, R. (2022). Perceptions of physical education students and teachers on physical education learning. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(2), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i2.39887

Osborne, R., Belmont, R. S., Peixoto, R. P., Azevedo, I. O. S. de, & Carvalho Junior, A. F. P. de. (2016). Obstacles for physical education teachers in public schools: An unsustainable situation. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 22(4), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-6574201600040015

Pantović, M., Pavlovic, R., & Joksimović, M. (2018). Problems of teaching of physical education: Why students (don’t) like physical education classes? Slovak Journal of Sport Science, 3(1), 1–20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330881088

Park, E. (2022). A needs analysis to develop new curriculum for Korean college students in higher education. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46564

Perdana, R., Jumadi, J., & Rosana, D. (2019). Relationship between analytical thinking skill and scientific argumentation using PBL with interactive CK 12 simulation. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 1(1), 16–23. https://interactives.ck12.org/simulations/physics.html.

Ravaghi, H., Guisset, A.-L., Elfeky, S., Nasir, N., Khani, S., Ahmadnezhad, E., & Abdi, Z. (2023). A scoping review of community health needs and assets assessment: Concepts, rationale, tools and uses. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08983-3

Remesh, A. (2013). Microteaching, an efficient technique for learning effective teaching. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 18(2), 158–163. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3724377/

Rozi, F., Priyono, B., Waluyo, Shidiq, A. A. P., & Joseph, J. A. (2023). Physical education learning problematics in private Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. ELEMENTARY: Islamic Teacher Journal, 11(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v11i1.19232

Şahin, Ş., & Kılıç, A. (2020). Evaluation of the teaching practice course carried out with the Lesson Study Model. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 8(1), 99–127. https://doi.org/10.18543/TJHE-8(1)-2020PP99-127

Sari, Y. I. H., Wienanda, W. K., & Nugraheni, N. E. (2020). Needs analysis to develop teaching materials at vocational college UGM. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 10(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v10i2.27934

Scholtz, S. E. (2021). Sacrifice is a step beyond convenience: A review of convenience sampling in psychological research in Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 47(0), a1837. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1837

Sukmawati, R., & Purbaningrum, K. A. (2021). Didactic design of lesson study-based microteaching learning for prospective mathematics teacher students. KREANO: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 12(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v12i1.26413

Thangaraju, P., & Medhi, B. (2023). Microteaching: Overview and examination evaluation. Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 55(4), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_912_21

Utami, I. W. P., Mashuri, & Nafi’ah, U. (2016). A model of microteaching lesson study implementation in the prospective history teacher education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(27), 10–14. https://core.ac.uk/download/234639285.pdf

Veloo, A., & Md-Ali, R. (2016). Physical education teachers challenges in implementing school based assessment. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(8), 48–53. https://econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/3909

Wang, J. (2021). The influence of micro-teaching on teaching abilities of students majoring in physical education in physical schools. E3S Web of Conferences, 251, 03077. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125103077

York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307400325

Zhang, S., & Cheng, Q. (2011). Learning to teach through a Practicum-Based Microteaching Model. Action in Teacher Education, 33(4), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2011.620523

Zhou, G., & Xu, J. (2017). Microteaching Lesson Study: An approach to prepare teacher candidates to teach science through inquiry. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(3), 235–235. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.296039

Zulaeha, I., & Luriawati, D. (2010). Pengembangan model pembelajaran mikro inovatif bagi peningkatan kompetensi pedagogik calon guru bahasa Indonesia. Lingua: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15294/lingua.v6i2.873

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v12i1.71950