Tingkat kepuasan wasit sepakbola dalam mengambil keputusan berdasarkan tingkat pendidikan

Hikmat Kodrat; Nurlan Kusmaedi; Ahmad Hamidi

doi:10.21831/medikora.v19i1.30514

Tingkat kepuasan wasit sepakbola dalam mengambil keputusan berdasarkan tingkat pendidikan

Hikmat Kodrat, Fakultas Pendidikan Olahraga dan Kesehatan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Nurlan Kusmaedi, Fakultas Pendidikan Olahraga dan Kesehatan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Ahmad Hamidi, Fakultas Pendidikan Olahraga dan Kesehatan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

10.21831/medikora.v19i1.30514

Abstract

Pengadil dalam pertandingan sepakbola yang dinamakan wasit/referee. Awalnya pengadil atau pengambil keputusan dilakukan oleh masing-masing kapten tim, kemudian peran ini di delegasikan kepada seorang umpire. Akhirnya, seorang yang dianggap netral dinamai referee (wasit) bertindak sebagai orang yang akan menyelesaikan permasalahan dalam pertandingan. Pengambilan keputusan harus berdasarkan pada fairplay, sportivitas, objektivitas, dan konsisten. Oleh karena itu peneliti ingin melakukan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui tentang tingkat kepuasan wasit sepakbola dalam mengambil keputusan berdasarkan tingkat pendidikan. Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kuantitatif adapun metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian yaitu Deskriptif dan desain penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah causal comparative. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah Wasit PSSI Kota Bandung yang memiliki Pendidikan SMA, S1, dan S2. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Purposive Sampling Metode rendem menggunakan kriteria yang telah dipilih pengambilan sampel secara sengaja sesuai dengan persyaratan sampel yang di perlukan. Instrument yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah menggunakan angket Soccer Referee Decision Satisfaction Scale (SRDSS) yang dikembangkan oleh Andrew et. al. (2006). Berdasarkan hasil pengolahan data maka terdapat perbedaan antara tingkat kepuasan wasit sepakbola dalam mengambil keputusan berdasarkan tingkat pendidikan dengan hasil angket yaitu tingkat pendidikan S2 lebih puas dalam mengambil keputusan di bandingkan dengan S1 dan SMA. Maka tingkatan pendidikan wasit berpengaruh terhadap pengambilan keputusan semakin tinggi Pendidikan wasit maka semakian puas dalam mengambil keputusan.

Football referee satisfaction level in making decisions based on education level

Abstract

The judge in a soccer match called the referee / referee. Initially the court or decision maker is carried out by each team captain, then this role is delegated to an umpire. Finally, a person who is considered neutral is called a referee acting as the person who will solve the problem in the match. Decision making must be based on fair play, sportsmanship, objectivity, and consistency. Therefore the researcher wants to do this research to find out about the level of satisfaction of the football referee in making decisions based on their level of education. In this study using quantitative research while the method used in research is descriptive and the research design used in this study is causal comparative. The population in this study is PSSI Referee in Bandung City who has a high school, bachelor and master's education. The sampling technique used in this study is Purposive Sampling The rendem method uses criteria that have been chosen deliberately sampling in accordance with the required sample requirements. The instrument used in this study was a Soccer Referee Decision Satisfaction Scale (SRDSS) questionnaire developed by Andrew et. al. (2006). Based on the results of data processing, there is a difference between the level of satisfaction of football referees in making decisions based on the level of education with the results of the questionnaire, namely the education level of S2 is more satisfied in making decisions compared to S1 and SMA. Then the level of referee education influences the decision making the higher the referee education, the more satisfied in making decisions.

Keywords

satisfaction, soccer referees, decision making, education level, kepuasan, wasit sepakbola, mengambil keputusan, tingkat pendidikan

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bentler, P.M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of psychology, 31,419-456.

Bentler, P.M., &Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin, 88,588-606.Reilly T. Football. In: Reilly T, Secher N, Snell P. Williams C, eds. Physiology of Sports. London, UK: E and FN Spon, 1990:371-425.

Banyumanik, D. I. K. (2013). No Title, 2.

Can, Y., Bayansalduz, M., Soyer, F., & Pacali, S. (2014). Turkish adaptation of soccer referee decision satisfaction scale ( SRDSS ). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 756–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.316

Fraenkel, Jack R. Wallen, Norman E. Hyun, H. H. (1932). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. (M. Ryan, Ed.) (Eight Edit). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gulle, M. (2017). Assessment of the Correlation between Self-esteem in Decision-Making and Decision-Making Styles of Football Referees in terms of Their Refereeing Experience and Violence Perception ... Assessment of the Correlation between Self-esteem in Decision-Making and Decision-Making Styles of Football Referees in terms of Their Refereeing Experience and Violence Perceptions, (September). https://doi.org/10.14486/IntJSCS657

Hamidi, A. (2019). Improving Self esteem and Games Performances through Games based Learning in Physical Education Content Basketball at Secondary High School, 11(Icsshpe 2018), 4–7.

He, C. C. D., Reilly, T., Hons, G. A., & Hons, A. C. (1993). Analysis of the work rates and heart rates of association football referees, 27(3).

Lane, A. M., Nevill, A. M., Ahmad, N. S., & Balmer, N. (2006). SOCCER REFEREE DECISION-MAKING : ‘ SHALL I BLOW THE WHISTLE ?,’ 243–253.

Lane, A. M., Nevill, A. M., Ahmad, N. S., & Balmer, N. (2006). Soccer Referee Decision-Making: “shall I Blow the Whistle?”. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 5(2), 243–253.

Larkin, P., Berry, J., Dawson, B., & Lay, B. (2011). Perceptual and decision-making skills of Australian football umpires Perceptual and decision-making skills of Australian football umpires, (April 2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2011.11868562

Normadewi, B. (2012). Analisis Pengaruh Jenis Kelamin dan Tingkat Pendidikan Terhadap Persepsi Etis Mahasiswa Akutansi dengan Love of Mney Sebagai Variabel Intervening.

Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual, 3rd. Edition. McGrath Hill, 15.Sport & Exercise Sport & Exercise Psychology Review. (2013), 9(2).

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian. Metode Penelitian.

Thomas, J. (2005). Social Pressure Influences Decisions of Individuals: Evidence from the Behavior of Football Referees.

UUD No. 20 Tahun 2003, P. R. I. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional § (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-011-2889-1

Williams, M.A. and Fairclough, S.A. (2006). Influence of crowd noise in soccer on soccerrefereeing consistency. Paper submitted for publication.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/medikora.v19i1.30514