DIMENSI PERTANYAAN DOSEN DAN MAHASISWA PADA PEMBELAJARAN DI KELAS

Kastam Syamsi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Teguh Setiawan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


Salah satu indikator keberhasilan pengajaran adalah mampu membawa siswa dapat berpikir kritis. Salah satu cara yang dapat dilakukan untuk dapat menumbuhkan pola berpikir kritis adalah pemberian pertanyaan yang baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan (1) tipe pertanyaan dosen dan mahasiswa, (2) dimensi kognisi yang terkandung dalam pertanyaan yang dibuat oleh dosen dan mahasiswa, dan (3) dimensi pengetahuan yang terkandung dalam pertanyaan dosen dan mahasiswa jenjang S-1 dan S-2 pada Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Sumber data penelitian ini adalah pertanyaan yang diajukan oleh dosen dan mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran di kelas. Data yang berupa pertanyaan-pertanyaan dikumpulkan dengan cara direkam dan dicatat. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah human instrumen dan indikator tuturan yang mengandung pertanyaan. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data dapat ditarik tiga simpulan. Pertama, jenis pertanyaan yang diajukan oleh mahasiswa dan dosen pada jenjang S-1 dan S-2 ada dua, yaitu pentanyaan konvergen dan pertanyaan divergen. Kedua, dimensi kognitif pertanyaan mahasiswa S-1 masih berada pada tingkat C2 dan C3, dengan tingkatan C2 lebih banyak dibandingkan dengan C3; sebaliknya pertanyaan dosen S-1 sudah banyak ke arah C3 dan sudah mulai ke C4. Yang berarti pertanyaan mahasiswa dan dosen S-2 sudah mengarah ke kongnisi tingkat tinggi. Ketiga, dimensi pengetahuan pertanyaan mahasiswa dan dosen S-1 mencakup pengetahuan konseptual dan prosedural, sedangkan dimensi pengetahuan pada pertanyaan mahasiswa dan dosen S-2 mencakup dimensi konseptual, prosedural, dan metakognitif, sebagian besar berada dalam dimensi pengetahuan prosedural yang berarti mahasiswa bergerak pada pola pikir yang lebih abstrak dan rumit.
Kata Kunci: dimensi pertanyaan, dimensi pengetahuan, pembelajaran kelas


DIMENSIONS OF LECTURER AND STUDENT QUESTIONS
ON LEARNING IN CLASS

Abstract
One indicator of teaching success is being able to bring students to think critically. One way that can be done to be able to grow critical thinking patterns is giving good questions. This study aims to describe (1) the types of lecturer and student questions, (2) the dimensions of cognition contained in the questions made by lecturers and students, and (3) the dimensions of knowledge contained in the questions made by lecturers and students in the undergraduate and graduate in the Indonesian Language and Literacy Education Study Program of Yogyakarta State University. The data source of this research is the questions posed by lecturers and students in Indonesian language and literature study programs at the time of the class chase, both for bachelor and master degree programs. Data in the form of questions are collected by means of recorded and recorded. The instruments used in this study are human instruments and speech indicators that contain questions. Based on the results of data analysis three conclusions can be drawn. First, the types of questions posed by students and lecturers at the bachelor and master level are two, namely convergent questions and divergent questions. Second, the cognitive dimensions of S-1 student questions are still at levels C2 and C3, with higher C2 levels. compared to C3. On the other hand, there are many questions from the S-1 lecturer towards C3 and have started to C4. the question of students and S-2 lecturers who have led to a high-level technician. Third, knowledge on the questions of students and lecturers of S-1 covers conceptual and procedural knowledge, the knowledge on the questions of the S-2 students and lecturers included the conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive changes. Most are in the dimensions of procedural knowledge. That is, students move on a more abstract and complex mindset.

Keywords: question dimension, knowledge dimension, classroom learning


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching And Assessing: A Revision Of Bloom’s Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Bonds, N. (2007). Questioning Strategies That Minimize Classroom Management Problems. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 44(1), 18-21. DOI: 10.1080/00228958.2007.10516486

Crowe, M., & Stanford, P. (2010). Questuoning for Quality. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 76, 4: 36-44. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-2072982971/questioning-for-quality.

Cunningham, G. (2009). The New Teacher’s Companion, Practical Wisdom for Succeeding in the Classroom. Alexandra, VA: ASDC.

Dillon, J.T. (1982). Cognitive Respondence Between Question/Statement and Response. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 540-551. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ275534.

Eriyanti, R. W. (2014). Konstruksi Ideologi Bahasa Guru dalam Pembelajaran di Kelas. Litera, Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 13(1), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v13i1.1903.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An overview, Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2.

Kurniastuti, I., Setyawan, Th. Y., & Sonialopita, S. (2018). Designing Essential Questions in The Process of Teaching and Learning To Deepen Understanding and Develop Students’ Awareness Toward Environment. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v37i1.15125.

Manson, Gary. (1973). Classroom Questioning for Geography Teachers. Journal of Geography, 72; 4: 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221347308981289

Mayberry, S. C., & Hartle, L. (2003). The Successful Teacher’s Guide to Frequently Asked Questions. Lanham, MD: A Scarecrow Education Book.

Meyer, M. (1988). Questiona and questioning. New York: deGruyter.

Olrich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Trevisan, M. S., & Brown, A. H. (2007). Teaching Strategies, A Guide to Effective Instruction. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.

Patricia, Albergaria-Almeida. (2010). Questioning Patterns and Teaching Strategies in Secondary Education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 751-756. (2010)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.096

Pollack, H. (1988). Questioning Strategies to Encourage Critical Thinking, ERIC, 21(1), 11-17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED297410.

Pranowo, D. J, & Tobing, R. L. (2018). Kategori Pertanyaan pada Ujian Tugas Akhir Skripsi. Litera, Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 17(2), 240-249. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v17i2.21019.

Reid, G. (2007). Motivating Learners in the Classroom: Ideas and Strategies. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Schwartz, B dan Millar, G. (1996). You Are What You Ask: The Power of Teaching Students Questioning Skill for Enabling Thinking. Calgary: Sage.

Shen, P, & Yodkhumlue, B. (2012). A Case Study of Teacher’s Questioning and Students’ Critical Thinking in College EFL Reading Classroom. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1), 199-206. DOI:10.5539/ijel.v2n1p199.

Shodell, M. (1995). The Question-Driven Classroom: Student Questions as Course Curriculum in Biology, The American Biology Teacher, 57(5), 278-281. https://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article/57/5/278/15378/The-Question-Driven-Classroom-Student-Questions-as.

Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational Psychology, Theory And Practice. Eight Edition. Boston: Pearson.

Sun, Z. (2012). An Empirical Study on New Teacher-Student Relationship and Questioning Strategies in ESL Classroom. English Language Teaching, 5(7), 175-183. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v5n7p175

Wragg, E. C., & Brown, G. (2001). Questioning in the secondary school. London: Routhlegde.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v19i2.33442

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




______________________

 

                               

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Litera Journal is published by the Faculty of Languages, Arts, and Culture Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta in collaboration with Himpunan Sarjana Kesusasteraan Indonesia (HISKI)

 

RJI Main logo

 

      

The International Journal of Linguistic, Literature, and Its Teaching at http://http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/litera/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

 

Flag Counter