Infrastructure Management of the Smart and Green Learning Center Building Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/inersia.v20i1.67639Keywords:
Maintenance, Condition Index, and Analytical Hierarchy ProcessAbstract
Building infrastructure management is a key element in maintaining and improving the efficiency, sustainability, and quality of a building. The Smart and Green Learning Center (SGLC) building at Gadjah Mada University is a modern building that functions as both an administrative office and a lecture hall. The building boasts a modern design featuring extensive use of glass and stands 11 stories tall. It embodies the concept of a green and smart building. Hence, it requires serious attention in terms of effective maintenance and proper maintenance to ensure the building can function properly. This research uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to obtain weighting values for room components/elements. This weighting value is then used to calculate the SGLC building component condition index, which can provide information of whether the component is damaged or not. The weighting values are obtained by distributing questionnaires, while the condition index is determined through observation. The components observed include structural, architectural, and utility components. The results show that weighting values for structure, architecture and utilities were 46.3%, 33.9% and 19.8%, respectively. In the structural components, it is found that the column, beam, and plate weighting values are 48.3%, 42.7% and 8.9%, respectively. In the architectural components, the weighting values for ceilings, walls, floors & ceramics, doors & windows are 11.7%, 36.6%, 8.8%, 42.9% respectively. In the utility components, the weighting values for electricity, electronics, elevators, building sensor systems, and plumbing are 30%, 22.3%, 4.9%, 19.1%, and 23.7%, respectively. After searching floors 1 to 11, it was seen that the structural components were still in exceptionally good condition. There is only minor damage to utility and architectural components that require maintenance such as repair or replacement of components that are no longer suitable for use.
References
S. Kim, S. Lee, and Y. H. Ahn, "Evaluating Housing Maintenance Costs with Loss-Distribution Approach in South Korean Apartment Housing," J. Manag. Eng., vol. 35, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000672.
C. P. Au-Yong, S. Chua, A. Ali, and M. Tucker, "Optimising maintenance cost by prioritising maintenance of facilities services in residential buildings," Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 26, pp. 1593–1607, May 2019, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-07-2018-0265.
S.-W. Whang, R. Flanagan, S. Kim, and S. Kim, "Contractor-Led Critical Design Management Factors in High-Rise Building Projects Involving Multinational Design Teams," J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 143, no. 5, p. 06016009, May 2017, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001242
S.J.L. Chua, N.B. Zubbir, A.S. Ali,C.P. Au-Yong, "Maintenance of high-rise resindential buildings," pp. 137-151, (2018).
R. da Silva, A. Melani, M. Michalski, G. Souza, S. Nabeta, and F. Hamaji, "Defining Maintenance Performance Indicators for asset management based on ISO 55000 and Balanced Scorecard: A hydropower plant case study," Jun. 2020. doi: 10.3850/978-981-14-8593-0_3820-cd.
P. Benítez, E. Rocha, H. Varum, and F. Rodrigues, "A dynamic multi-criteria decision-making model for the maintenance planning of reinforced concrete structures," J. Build. Eng., vol. 27, p. 100971, Jan. 2020, doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100 971.
R. Ahmed, F. Nasiri, and T. Zayed, "A novel Neutrosophic-based machine learning approach for maintenance prioritization in healthcare facilities," J. Build. Eng., vol. 42, p. 102480, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102480.
M. A. Anshebo, W. J. Mengesha, and D. L. Sokido, "Developing a Green Building Assessment Tool for Ethiopia," Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 9,p. el0569, Sep.2022,doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10569.
T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, "A Model of Neural Impulse Firing and Synthesis," J. Math. Psychol., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 200–219, Jun. 1993, doi: 10.1006/jmps.1993.1013
T. L. Saaty, "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, Sep. 1990, doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.
N. Munier, E. Hontoria, "Uses and limitations of the AHP method: A non-mathematical and rational analysis," in Management for Professionals, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar].
T. L. Saaty, "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, Sep. 1990, doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.
Hudson, W.R., Haas, R., Uddin, 1997. "Infrastructure management," [WWW Document]. Univ. Indones. Libr. URL https://lib.ui.ac.id
N. Hazem, M. Abdelraouf, I. Fahim, and S. El-Omari, "A Novel Green Rating System for Existing Buildings," Sustainability, vol. 12, p. 7143, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12177143
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with INERSIA journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the INERSIA journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
INERSIA by https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/inersia was distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
