Strategi Open Ended dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa pada Pembelajaran Tematik

Asep Ediana Latif, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
Desi Ayu Lestari, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


This study aims to determine the application of open ended strategies can improve students' creative thinking abilities. The research method used in this study is the classroom action research (CAR) method using the Kurt Lewin model consisting of four components namely, planning, action, observation and reflection. The research subjects were 45 students of MI Al-Khoiriyah Sawangan class of students. Data collection techniques used were observation sheets, interviews and documentation. Data analysis was performed in a qualitative description. Based on the results of the first cycle study 63% of students stated to have the ability to think creatively, in the second cycle 88% of students have the ability to think creatively. This achievement shows that the use of open ended strategies can improve students' creative thinking skills in thematic learning

 

KeywordsCreative thinking ability, open ended, thematic learning, elementary school


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adelman, C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research, 1(1), 7–24.

Akbar, S. (2014). Penyegaran Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasis KKNI Kurikulum 2013: makalah kuliah umum. Malang: Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang.

Bernadi, R. M. A. (2017). Peningkatan kreativitas siswa kelas IV SD melalui pembelajaran tematik integratif dengan pendekatan open-ended. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 5(1), 91–101.

Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, Ja. R. (2013). ). STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (Second). Springer Science & Business Media.

Dumic, J., Dabelic, S., & Flögel, M. (2006). Galectin-3: an open-ended story. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects, 1760(4), 616–635.

Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and Practicing Secondary School Science Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs about the Philosophy of Science. Science Education, 75(1), 121–133.

Karyana, C. (2019). Penerapan Teknik Memindai dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar Cikurubug. DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 2(1), 1–8.

Mastur, M. (2017). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran di SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(1), 50–64.

Mulyani, S. (2017). Metode Analisis dan Perancangan Sistem. Abdi Sistematika.

Munandar, M. (2016). Kreativitas & keberbakatan strategi mewujudkan potensi kreatif & bakat.

Prananto, I. W. (2017). Pengembangan Panduan Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Terpadu Tema Berbagai Pekerjaan Kelas IV Dengan Optimalisasi Pemanfaatan Multimedia. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Rachmawati, Y. (2012). Strategi Pengembangan Kreativitas Pada Anak. Prenada Media.

Reja, U., Manfreda, K. L., Hlebec, V., & Vehovar, V. (2003). Open-ended vs. close-ended questions in web questionnaires. Developments in Applied Statistics, 19(1), 159–177.

Trianto, T. (2010). Model pembelajaran terpadu. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v3i1.29908

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v3i1.29908.g14117

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Asep Ediana Latif, Desi Ayu Lestari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

DIDAKTIKA has been abstracted and indexed by

View Didaktika Stats