Komitmen sebagai prediktor subjective well being pada dewasa awal yang berpacaran
Yulia Ayriza, Departemen Psikologi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Abstract
Kebahagiaan sangat penting untuk kesejahteraan individu dewasa awal, salah satu cara yang dapat dilakukan yaitu dengan mempertahankan hubungan romantis melalui komitmen. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peran komitmen sebagai prediktor subjective well being pada dewasa awal yang berpacaran. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif. Sampel penelitian ini berjumlah 497 responden yang diperoleh dengan metode accidental sampling. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu skala subjective well being dan skala komitmen (The Commitment Inventory). Skala subjective well being memiliki dua subskala yakni, skala PANAS dan skala kepuasan hidup. Validitas skala diuji menggunakan validitas isi melalui expert judgement. Reliabilitas diuji menggunakan Alpha Cronbach. Koefisien reliabilitas pada skala SWB di antaranya afek positif sebesar 0,804, afek negatif sebesar 0,813, dan kepuasan hidup sebesar 0,872. Pada skala komitmen didapatkan koefisien reliabilitas sebesar 0,844. Analisis data menggunakan teknik analisis regresi linear sederhana. Analisis regresi menunjukkan ada pengaruh signifikan komitmen terhadap subjective well being dengan nilai p<0,05. Besar kontribusi (R2) komitmen terhadap subjective well being pada dewasa awal yang berpacaran adalah sebesar 37%, sisanya disumbang oleh variabel-variabel lain
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Azwar, S. (2017). Metode penelitian psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ayriza, Y., Setiawati, F.A., Nurhayati, S.R., et al. (2019). Does sleep quality serve as a mediator between well-being and academic achievement?. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 63-74.
Demir, M. (2010). Close relationships and happiness among emerging adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 293-313. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9141-x.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., et al. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71– 75.
Drigotas, S. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Verette, J. (1999). Level of commitment, mutuality of commitment, and couple well‐ being. Personal Relationships, 6(3), 389-409.
Dush, C. M. K., & Amato, P. R. (2005). Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 607- 627.
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Psychological Issues, I, 1- 171
Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2010). Breakup distress and loss of intimacy in university student. Psychology, 1, 173-177
Gagne, F. M., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Mindset and relationship illusions: The moderating effects of domain specificity and relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(9), 1144- 1155.
Knee, C. R., Patrick, H., Vietor, N. A., & Neighbors, C. (2004). Implicit theories of relationships: Moderators of the link between conflict and commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(5) 617-628.
Londero-Santos, A., Natividade, J. C., & Féres- Carneiro, T. (2021). Do romantic relationships promote happiness? relationships’ characteristics as predictors of subjective well-being. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 15(1), 3-19.
Moore, S., & Diener, E. (2019). Types of subjective well-being and their associations with relationship outcomes. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing, 3(2), 112-118.
Owen, J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2011). The revised commitment inventory: Psychometrics and use with unmarried couples. Journal of family issues, 32(6), 820-841.
Righetti, F., Schneider, I., Ferrier, D., Spiridonova, T., Xiang, R., & Impett, E. A. (2020). The bittersweet taste of sacrifice: Consequences for ambivalence and mixed reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ xge0000750.
Sternberg, Robert J. (1986). “A triangular theory of love.” Psychological Review, 93: 119–35. DOI:10.1037/0033–295X.93.2.119.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan r&d. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suwito, L.D. (2013). Hubungan komitmen dalam berpacaran dengan subjective well-being pada mahasiswa UKSW Salatiga yang menjalani hubungan pacaran jarak jauh. (Skripsi). Fakultas Psikologi. Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063– 1070.
Weisskirch, R. S. (2017). Abilities in romantic relationships and well-being among emerging adults. Marriage & Family Review, 53(1), 36–47.
Wood, J. T. (2007). Interpersonal communication: everyday encounters. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/ap.v5i1.68912
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Our Journal is Indexed by:
Acta Psychologia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/acta-psychologia/.