PERUBAHAN BUDAYA KERJA INDUSTRI DENGAN MODEL-BASED DEFINITION

Febrianto Amri Ristadi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Yatin Ngadiyono, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Surono Surono, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

 10.21831/dinamika.v6i2.44131

Abstract


Pendekatan Definisi Berbasis Model atau Model-based Definition (MBD) semakin populer di berbagai industri yang sebelumnya telah berhasil memanfaatkan Computer-aided Design (CAD) secara optimal. Dengan integrasi anotasi, keterangan gambar dan informasi keteknikan lain pada model 3 dimensi (3D) secara langsung, proses desain, manufaktur dan inspeksi akan lebih cepat dan efisien. Namun, pendekatan ini belum banyak diterapkan di industri nasional dan artikel penelitian skala nasional tentang MBD pun tidak ditemukan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah artikel review dengan penelusuran artikel pada database ilmiah menggunakan kata kunci, rentang waktu publikasi, serta kesesuaian dan kelayakan artikel. Hasil dari artikel review ini menunjukkan berbagai manfaat dari inisiatif MBD yang mampu mentransformasikan budaya kerja di industri dan sangat potensial untuk diterapkan di industri skala nasional.  Artikel ini juga membahas mengenai kekurangan yang masih ada pada implementasi MBD. Dengan pendekatan MBD diharapkan dapat meningkatkan kualitas desain, kualitas produk, efektivitas biaya, serta mengurangi waktu dari tahap desain hingga tahap pemasaran produk. Selain itu MBD diharapkan dapat bersinergi dengan metode lain yang digunakan dalam daur hidup produk.

Keywords


definisi berbasis model; mbd; cad; model 3d; budaya kerja

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifin A.N., Ristadi F.A. (2017). Relevansi Kompetensi Teknik Gambar Manufaktur Di Smk Muhammadiyah 2 Jatinom Terhadap Kebutuhan Industri, Jurnal Dinamika Vokasional Teknik Mesin 2(2), 105–110

ASME, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Digital Product Definition Data Practices ASME Y14.41-2003, vol. ASME Y14.41-2003, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 2003, pp. viii, 91.

Barnard A., Frechette S., Srinivasan V. (2014). A portrait of an ISO STEP tolerancing standard as an enabler of smart manufacturing systems. 13th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing.

Bock C., Feeney A.B. (2013). Engineering Change Management Concepts for Systems Modeling.

Camba J., Contero M., Johnson M., Company P. (2014). Extended 3D annotations as a new mechanism to explicitly communicate geometric design intent and increase CAD model reusability, Computer-Aided Design 57, 61–73.

Frechette S. (2011). Model Based Enterprise for Manufacturing. 44th CIRP International Conference on Manufacturing Systems.

Frechette S.P., Jones A.T., Fischer B.R. (2013). Strategy for Testing Conformance to Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing Standards, Procedia CIRP 10, 211–215.

Gaha R., Durupt A., Eynard B. (2021). Towards the implementation of the Digital Twin in CMM inspection process, opportunities, challenges and proposals, Procedia Manufacturing 54, 216–221.

Geng J., Tian X., Bai M., Jia X., Liu X. (2014). A design method for three-dimensional maintenance, repair and overhaul job card of complex products, Computers in Industry 65(1), 200–209.

Gupta R.K., Gurumoorthy B. (2021). Feature-based ontological framework for semantic interoperability in product development, Advanced Engineering Informatics 48, 101260.

Hallmann M., Goetz S., Schleich B. (2019). Mapping of GD&T information and PMI between 3D product models in the STEP and STL format, Computer-Aided Design 115, 293–306.

Hartman, N., Zahner, J., Hedberg, T. and Barnard, A. (2017), Extending and Evaluating the Model-based Product Definition, Grant/Contract Reports (NISTGCR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.

Huang R., Zhang S., Xu C., Zhang X., Zhang C. (2015). A flexible and effective NC machining process reuse approach for similar subparts, Computer-Aided Design 62, 64–77.

Lipman R., Lubell J. (2015). Conformance checking of PMI representation in CAD model STEP data exchange files, Computer-Aided Design 66.

Mas F., Arista R., Oliva M., Hiebert B., Gilkerson I., Rios J. (2015). A Review of PLM Impact on US and EU Aerospace Industry, Procedia Engineering 132, 1053–1060.

Mine A., et al. (2019). Effectiveness of current adhesive systems when bonding to CAD/CAM indirect resin materials: A review of 32 publications, Japanese Dental Science Review 55(1), 41–50.

Mohammed, S. K., Arbo, M. H., & Tingelstad, L. (2021). Leveraging model based definition and STEP AP242 in task specification for robotic assembly. Procedia CIRP, 97, 92–97.

Quintana V., Rivest L., Pellerin R., Venne F., Kheddouci F. (2010). Will Model-based Definition replace engineering drawings throughout the product lifecycle? A global perspective from aerospace industry, Computers in Industry 61(5), 497–508.

Quintana V., Rivest L., Pellerin R., Kheddouci F. (2012). Re-engineering the Engineering Change Management process for a drawing-less environment, Computers in Industry 63(1), 79–90.

Ristadi F.A., Ngadiyono Y. (2017). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis CTL Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menggambar Berbantuan Komputer (CAD) Siswa SMK, Jurnal Dinamika Vokasional Teknik Mesin 2(1), 73–81

Saunders P., Cai B., Orchard N., Maropoulos P. (2013). Towards a Definition of PLM-integrated Dimensional Measurement, Procedia CIRP 7, 670-675.

Srinivasan V. (2008). Standardizing the specification, verification, and exchange of product geometry: Research, status and trends, Computer-Aided Design 40(7).

Trainer, A. , Hedberg, T. , Barnard, A. , Fischer, K. and Rosche, P. (2016). Gaps Analysis Of Integrating Product Design, Manufacturing, And Quality Data In The Supply Chain Using Model-Based Definition, Proceedings of the ASME 2016 Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference

Urbas U., Vrabič R., Vukašinović N. (2019). Displaying Product Manufacturing Information in Augmented Reality for Inspection, Procedia CIRP 81, 832–837.

Wan N., Mo R., Liu L., Li J. (2014). New methods of creating MBD process model, On the basis of machining knowledge, Computers in Industry 65(4), 537–549.

Yi Y., Yan Y., Liu X., Ni Z., Feng J., Liu J. (2021). Digital twin-based smart assembly process design and application framework for complex products and its case study, Journal of Manufacturing Systems 58, 94–107.

Zhao D., Tian X., Geng J. (2016). A Comprehensive System for Digital Assembly Precision Simulation and Optimization of Aircraft, Procedia CIRP 56, 243–248.

Zhao D., Wang G., Guo W., Zhang Q. (2019). An Integrated Framework for Aircraft Digital Assembly Coordination Design and Simulation, Procedia CIRP 83, 330–334.

Zhou Y., Li Y., Wang W. (2011). A feature-based fixture design methodology for the manufacturing of aircraft structural parts, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 27(6), 986–993.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/dinamika.v6i2.44131

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Dinamika Vokasional Teknik Mesin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons 

Jurnal Dinamika Vokasional Teknik Mesin by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/dynamika was distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


 

View My Stats