Exploring theme-based tasks using familiar topics in promoting secondary learners’ speaking and writing skills

Khadijah Maming, Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare, Indonesia
Abdul Hakim Yassi, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
Noer Jihad Saleh, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
Ria Rosdiana Jubhari, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia

Abstract


This study attempted to explore theme-based tasks using familiar topics in promoting learners’ productive skills namely speaking and writing skill at Indonesian secondary school context. This study was pre-experimental research undertaken in five junior secondary schools. There are eighty-six students participated as research respondents. Test and observation checklist used as research instruments. The research findings reported the mean scores on productive skills acquired by the students were getting improvement from pretest to posttest. In speaking skill, the mean score of posttest was 58.95 was better than 40.76 in pretest mean score. Similarly, the mean score of writing posttest was 76.85 was higher than 63.86 in pretest. It indicated that the progress of students’ score in speaking skill was 18.19 and the progress of students’ score in writing skill was 12.99. Although the gain scores in speaking and writing tests are slightly different, but it can be stated the students’ productive skills promote significantly. Then, the result of t-test value on students’ speaking skill posttest and pretest was 18.37, while the t-test value on students’ writing skill posttest and pretest was 16.42. The both of these values are higher than t-table value. It indicated there is a significant difference between pretest and posttest for both tests. The students’ English productive skills after treated by implementation of theme-based tasks were categorized as good achievement. Additionally, the majority of students’ learning activities in English class are categorized as good category. They participated positively in English learning activities in terms of good attention, high seriousness, and activeness in group work.

Keywords: Familiar Topics, Improvement, Productive Language, Theme-Based Tasks

 


Keywords


Familiar Topics, Improvement, Productive Language, Theme-Based Tasks

Full Text:

Pdf

References


Akdeniz, C. 2016. Instructional process and concepts in theory and practice. Singapore: Springer Nature. Retrieved from http://gen.lib.rus.ec.

Allen, W. W. (2014). Content-based instruction in foreign language education : Models and Methods by Stephen R . Stryker ; Betty Lou Leaver The Modern Language Journal , Vol . 83 , No . 2 ( Summer , 1999 ), pp . 278-280 Published by : Wiley on behalf of the National Federatio. 83(2), 278–280.

Baecher, L. Tim, F. 2014. The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Language Teaching Research. Volume 18 (1), 118-137. Retrieved from http://Itr.sagepub.com/content/18/1/118.

Bozdoğan, D., & Karlıdağ, B. (2013). Neglected productive skills in content-based Classes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1152–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.171

Chapple, L., & Curtis, A. (2000). Content-based instruction in Hong Kong: Student responses to film. System, 28(3), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00021-X

Crocker, J., & Bowden, M. (2011).Thinking in English: A content-based approach. JALT 2010 Conference Proceedings, 663–670. http://jalt-publications.org/proceedings/articles/1131-thinking-english-content-based-approach%0Apapers2://publication/uuid/32E5C234-CDAC-4F98-A907-1FB193CEC01D

Diane Larsen-Freeman and Marti Anderson. (2011). Techniques-principles-language-teaching.

Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah (DEPDIKNAS). 2005. Peraturan direktorat jenderal pendidikan dasar dan menengah tentang penilaian perkembangan anak didik. Jakarta.

Elaggoune, A. (2015). Integrating the Content-based instruction into the American civilization class. Arab World English Journal, August, 61–69. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=109082306&site=ehost-live

Ercan, O., Bilen, K., & Bulut, A. (2014). The effect of web-based instruction with educational animation content at sensory organs subject on students’ academic achievement and attitudes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(February 2014), 2430–2436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.587

Gay,L. R., Mills G. E., Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research : Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed). Pearson Education, Inc.

Gay, L & Mills (2019). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. ERIC.

Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The effect of text familiarity on Iranian EFL learners’ listening comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(4), 783–789. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.4.783-789

Guthrie, E. M. (1988). Approaches and methods in language teaching: a description and analysis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 44(3), 551–551. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.44.3.551

Heaton. (1988). J_B_Heaton_Writing_English_Language_Tes.pdf.

Kasper, L. F. (1995). Theory and practice in content-based ESL reading instruction. English for Specific Purposes, 14(3), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(95)00012-3

Kennedy, T. J. (n.d.). Language learning and its impact on the brain: Connecting language learning with the Mind Through Content-Based Instruction. 39(3), 471–486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02900.x

Lang, W. (2012). Content-based instruction and world heritage sites. JALT2011 Conference Proceedings, 143–151.

Leong, L.-M., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2017). An analysis of factors influencing learners’ English speaking Skill. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijree.2.1.34

Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, March, 1–601. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968

Menteri Pendidikan. 2006. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (BSNP). Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan.

Nattinger, J. (2014). Some current trends in vocabulary teaching. Vocabulary and Language Teaching, 62–82.

Norman, A. H. 2017. Topic familiarity and vocabulary knowledge: implications for instructions. National Seminar Proceeding. Page 98-104. Retrieved from http://english.stkipbjm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Annisa-Humaira-Norman.pdf.

Nurgiyantoro, B. 1987. Penilaian dalam pengajaran bahasa dan sastra. PT BPFE: Yogyakarta.

Othman, J., & Vanathas, C. (2005). Topic familiarity and its influence on listening comprehension. The English Teacher, 34(1), 19–32.

Rambe, R. N. Nasution, B. Supartinah. (2022). Applying the 'BUCS' strategy in grade IV of elementary school to learn main ideas and supporting details. Jurnal Diksi, 30(2), 128-138. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/diksi/article/view/33025/18171. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v30i2.33025

Renandya, W. A. (2020). Motivation in the Language Classroom.

Riandi. (2022). Going beyond common motivational strategies and teaching styles. Jurnal Diksi, 30(1), 24-34. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/diksi/article/view/45478. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v30i1.45478

Richards, C. J. 2018. Learning strategy Vs classroom task. Retrieved from https://www.professorjackrichards.com/work/publications/.

Rodgers, M. Daryl. 2006. Developing content and form: Encouraging evidence from Italian content-based Instruction. The Modern Language Journal. Volume 90(3), 373-386. Retrieved from 10.1111@j.1540-4781.2006.00430.x.pdf.

Salataci, R., Demirdirek, N., & Özgirin, N. (2010). E-documentaries in content-based instruction (CBI) in an academic EFL setting. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.033

Schleppegrell J M & Achugar, M, et. al. 2004. The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, Volume 38(1), 67-93. Retrieved from 10.2307@3588259.pdf.

Snow, A. M. Met, M & Genesee, F. 1989. A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly. Volume 23(2). Retrieved from http://libgen.io/scimag.

Song, B. 2006. Content-based ESL instruction: Long term effects and outcomes. Journal of English for Specific Purposes. Volume 25(4), 420-437. Retrieved from 10.1016@j.esp.2005.09.002.pdf.

Spencer H. B & Guillaume, M. A. 2006. Integrating curriculum through the learning cycle: Content-based reading and vocabulary instruction. The reading Teacher. Volume 60(3), 206-219. Retrieved from 10.1598@rt.60.3.1_2.pdf

Stoller, F. L. (2002). Language teaching or a framework for strategic language. Tesol 2002, 16, 2006. https://carla.umn.edu/cobaltt/modules/strategies/stoller2002/stoller.pdf

Stroupe, R., Jones, J. F., Lee, S., Macalister, J., & Jones, D. (2014). Language education in Asia. Language Education in Asia, Volume 2, Issue 1, 2011 Table, 49(4), iii–iv. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24642993

Sugandi, A. 2004. Teori pembelajaran. Semarang: UPT MKK UNNES.

Weigle, C. S. 2002. Assessing writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v31i1.59414

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Jurnal Diksi is published by Faculty of Languages, Arts, and Culture, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. It is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/diksi

 

Our Journal has been Indexed by:

  

  

   

Diksi Journal is published by the Faculty of Languages and Arts Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta in collaboration with Himpunan Sarjana Kesusasteraan Indonesia (HISKI)

Supervised by:


 
Translator
 
View My Stats